# 2026-02483: United States et al. v. RealPage, Inc.et al.; Response of the United States to Public Comments

2026-02483, United States et al. v. RealPage, Inc.et al.; Response of the United States to Public Comments, is a Federal Register notice from Justice Department, Antitrust Division published 2026-02-09 (as of 2026-06-08).

- Canonical: https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-02483
- As of: 2026-06-08
- Plain-text twin of the page above; the HTML and this file carry the same facts.

## Facts
- Document number: 2026-02483
- Title: United States et al. v. RealPage, Inc.et al.; Response of the United States to Public Comments
- Type: Notice
- Agencies: Justice Department; Antitrust Division
- Citation: 91 FR 5778
- Published: 2026-02-09
- Effective: unknown
- Comments close: not stated
- Significant: no
- Touches household money: no
- Regulation identifier numbers: none
- Last updated: 2026-06-08

## Summary

The U.S. government responded to public feedback about its plan to fix unfair business practices by RealPage and Greystar, companies involved in housing services. They believe their solution is fair and will help renters by promoting competition. Soon, the court will decide to approve this plan, which could affect how these companies operate and impact rental markets.

## Effects PRIA read

- Ban on data-driven price setting: benefit, medium. The proposed Final Judgment prohibits Greystar from licensing or using any revenue management product that uses third-party nonpublic data to recommend or set rental prices. This restriction is part of the remedy the United States proposes to address alleged antitrust violations involving RealPage…
- No pooling across different owners: benefit, medium. The proposed Final Judgment bars Greystar from licensing or using any revenue management product that pools information from Greystar properties that have different owners. That forbids combining data across properties with different ownership to generate pricing recommendations.
- Prohibition on using competitors' nonpublic data: benefit, medium. The proposed Final Judgment prohibits Greystar from disclosing, soliciting, or using competitively sensitive nonpublic information from competitors that can be used to set rental prices or generate pricing recommendations. The restriction explicitly covers data obtained through market surveys or ot…
- Compliance, monitoring, and inspections required: cost, medium. The proposed Final Judgment requires Greystar to adopt a written antitrust compliance policy, designate a chief antitrust compliance officer to train employees, obtain certifications from vendors about data use, permit the United States to inspect documents and interview employees, and be subject t…
- Intended benefit: promote competition for renters: benefit, medium. The United States states that the proposed Final Judgment is intended to remedy the alleged antitrust violations and 'will help renters by promoting competition' by stopping the sharing and use of competitors' nonpublic data. After publication of this response, the United States will move the Court…

## Related documents

- [2026-19100](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-19100): United States of America, et al. v. RealPage, Inc., et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement, 2026-09-18
- [2026-18136](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-18136): United States v. KKR & Co. Inc., et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement, 2026-09-04
- [2026-16850](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-16850): United States of America, et al. v. CRH PLC, et al. Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement, 2026-08-19
- [2026-16112](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-16112): United States et al. v. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement, 2026-08-07
- [2026-14903](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-14903): United States, et al. v. OhioHealth Corporation; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement, 2026-07-23
- [2026-14935](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-14935): United States v. Edwards LifeSciences Corp. and Genesis MedTech Group Limited; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement, 2026-07-23

## Sources
- [2026-02483 on federalregister.gov](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/09/2026-02483/united-states-et-al-v-realpage-incet-al-response-of-the-united-states-to-public-comments)
- [2026-02483 as published (PDF)](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-02-09/pdf/2026-02483.pdf)

## Related
- [Previous: 2026-02482, Regulatory Issue Summary: Personnel Access Authorization Requirements for Non-I…](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-02482)
- [Next: 2026-02485, Marine Mammals; File No. 29154](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-02485)
- [All Federal Register documents](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register)

Source: PRIA, https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-02483 (as of 2026-06-08).