# 2026-07230: Surface Board Considers Fixing Secret Railroad Communications Rules 2026-07230, Petition for Rulemaking-Amendments to Regulations Governing Ex Parte Communications, is a Federal Register proposed rule from Surface Transportation Board published 2026-04-14, effective 2026-04-10 (as of 2026-06-11). - Canonical: https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-07230 - As of: 2026-06-11 - Plain-text twin of the page above; the HTML and this file carry the same facts. ## Facts - Document number: 2026-07230 - Title: Petition for Rulemaking-Amendments to Regulations Governing Ex Parte Communications - Type: Proposed Rule - Agencies: Surface Transportation Board - Citation: 91 FR 19090 - Published: 2026-04-14 - Effective: 2026-04-10 - Comments close: not stated - Significant: no - Touches household money: no - Regulation identifier numbers: none - Last updated: 2026-06-11 ## In one line Surface Board Considers Fixing Secret Railroad Communications Rules ## Summary The Surface Transportation Board is thinking about changing the rules on secret talks during cases, called ex parte communications. These changes could affect railroads, customers, and anyone involved in these cases by making the process clearer and fairer. People have until May 29, 2026, to share their thoughts, and these updates might save time and reduce confusion without extra costs. ## Abstract The Surface Transportation Board has received a petition asking it to revise and streamline the rules governing ex parte communications. The Board is considering several changes to its ex parte regulations and seeks comment from interested persons on the changes being considered. The Board also invites commenters to identify additional options for revisions to the Board's ex parte communications rules. ## Effects PRIA read - Routine Procedural Questions Allowed: benefit, low. The Board is considering adding text to say routine, procedural communications and status requests are not banned as ex parte. The change would clarify what “routine” and “procedural” mean so stakeholders can more easily ask basic questions without fear of violating the ex parte rule. - Technical Q&A with Staff May Be Permitted: benefit, low. The Board is exploring allowing brief ex parte technical and clarifying communications with Board staff about submitted evidence or complying with orders, subject to the disclosure process in 49 CFR 1102.2(g)(4). The Board says this could reduce motions and written decisions and save time in procee… - Meetings with Staff in Rulemakings Considered: mixed, low. The Board is considering letting stakeholders request ex parte meetings directly with Board staff (not just Board Members) during informal rulemakings, subject to the same disclosure rules in 49 CFR 1102.2(g)(4). The Board notes this could improve efficiency but may increase the number of ex parte… - Timing for Rulemaking Meetings May Be Flexible: mixed, low. The Board is exploring allowing the end date for ex parte meetings in informal rulemakings to be set case-by-case, which could be before or after the reply-comment deadline. The Board says it could also set additional reply deadlines for meeting summaries to protect fairness. - No Broad Change for One-Party or Class I Merger Ex Parte: cost, low. The Board will not revise rules to broadly allow ex parte communications in uncontested one-party proceedings or to permit ex parte communications across merger proceedings involving Class I railroads. The existing waiver process remains available for specific cases. - Staff Liaison and RCPA Contacts Remain Allowed: benefit, low. The Board clarifies that Office of Chief Counsel staff liaisons, RCPA (Rail Customer and Public Assistance), and OPAGAC interactions that provide informal, nonbinding guidance are not ex parte communications and may continue. The Board points to existing rules such as 49 CFR 1180.4(c)(6)(iii) for m… ## Related documents - [2026-20783](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-20783): First Student, Inc.-Acquisition of Control-Autumn Transportation Inc. and Ambassador Wheelchair Services, Inc., 2026-10-09 - [2026-20455](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-20455): 60-Day Notice of Intent To Seek Extension of Approval: Petitions for Declaratory Order and Petitions for Relief Not Otherwise Specified, 2026-10-06 - [2026-20456](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-20456): 60-Day Notice of Intent To Seek Extension of Approval: Classification Index Survey Form, 2026-10-06 - [2026-20205](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-20205): Macquarie Infrastructure Partners V GP, LLC, et al.-Control Exemption-Kankakee, Beaverville and Southern Railroad Company, 2026-10-02 - [2026-20206](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-20206): Union Pacific Railroad Company-Discontinuance of Service Exemption-in San Bernardino County, Cal., 2026-10-02 - [2026-19711](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-19711): CSX Transportation, Inc.-Abandonment Exemption-in Hamilton County, Ohio, 2026-09-28 ## Sources - [2026-07230 on federalregister.gov](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/14/2026-07230/petition-for-rulemaking-amendments-to-regulations-governing-ex-parte-communications) - [2026-07230 as published (PDF)](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-04-14/pdf/2026-07230.pdf) ## Related - [Previous: 2026-07218, Airworthiness Directives; Columbia Helicopters, Inc. and Restricted Category Mo…](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-07218) - [Next: 2026-07269, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Refreshes Record on Lower C-Band Petitions f…](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-07269) - [All Federal Register documents](https://policyrisk.com/federal-register) Source: PRIA, https://policyrisk.com/federal-register/2026-07230 (as of 2026-06-11).