# 119-hr-10025: Preventing Abuse of Digital Replicas Act

119-hr-10025, Preventing Abuse of Digital Replicas Act, is a 119th Congress bill sponsored by Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48] (R-CA); status introduced; PRIA reads it as touching household money (as of 2026-09-24).

- Canonical: https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-10025
- As of: 2026-09-24
- Plain-text twin of the page above; the HTML and this file carry the same facts.

## Facts
- Bill: 119-hr-10025
- Congress: 119
- Title: Preventing Abuse of Digital Replicas Act
- Status: introduced
- Introduced: 2026-08-03
- Sponsor: Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48] (R-CA)
- Cosponsors: 0
- Policy area: Commerce
- Touches household money: yes
- Last recorded action: 2026-09-24

## Summary

**This bill would create a presumption of trademark harm for unauthorized digital replicas used with goods or services.** It would amend the Trademark Act to add a rebuttable, presumption-based framework and to set limits, exceptions, and definitions for how digital replicas are handled in trademark cases. - Brands and rights holders would gain an easier path to claim confusion. Plaintiffs could invoke a rebuttable presumption that a digital replica used with goods or services is likely to cause confusion when they expressly plead it. - Creators and expressive users would keep protections. The bill excludes indirect liability claims, many expressive works and their promotional material, and preserves First Amendment safeguards from the presumption. - Platforms, courts, and remedies would face new rules. The measure would define "digital replica" and "relevant industry or market," treat the claim as intellectual property for Section 230 purposes, and limit available relief by precluding other-law remedies for covered uses with specified exceptions.

## Provisions PRIA read

- New trademark rule on digital replicas: mixed, low. If enacted, the bill would add a new rule to the Trademark Act about "digital replicas." It would create a rebuttable presumption that a digital replica used on or with goods, services, or their containers is likely to cause confusion. The presumption would apply only in civil suits under section 4…

## Related bills

- 119-hr-2725: Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act of 2025
- 119-hr-471: Fix Our Forests Act
- 119-hr-2709: Save Our Sequoias Act
- 119-hr-1927: CLEAR Act of 2025
- 119-hr-4073: Tsunami Warning, Research, and Education Act of 2025
- 119-hr-21: Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act

## Sources
- [119-hr-10025 on Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/10025)

## Related
- [119-hr-2725: Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-2725)
- [119-hr-471: Fix Our Forests Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-471)
- [119-hr-2709: Save Our Sequoias Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-2709)
- [119-hr-1927: CLEAR Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-1927)
- [119-hr-4073: Tsunami Warning, Research, and Education Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-4073)
- [119-hr-21: Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-21)
- [All bills in Congress](https://policyrisk.com/legislation)

Source: PRIA, https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-10025 (as of 2026-09-24).