# 119-hr-10250: No Preference Act

119-hr-10250, No Preference Act, is a 119th Congress bill sponsored by Rep. Bice, Stephanie I. [R-OK-5] (R-OK); status introduced; PRIA reads it as touching household money (as of 2026-09-17).

- Canonical: https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-10250
- As of: 2026-09-17
- Plain-text twin of the page above; the HTML and this file carry the same facts.

## Facts
- Bill: 119-hr-10250
- Congress: 119
- Title: No Preference Act
- Status: introduced
- Introduced: 2026-09-03
- Sponsor: Rep. Bice, Stephanie I. [R-OK-5] (R-OK)
- Cosponsors: 4
- Policy area: Government Operations and Politics
- Touches household money: yes
- Last recorded action: 2026-09-17

## Summary

**Ban on union‑labor preferences in federal contracting.** This bill would bar executive agencies and the Department of Defense from requiring or giving preference to offerors based on whether they use workers covered by a collective bargaining agreement. - Contractors: Companies bidding for federal work could not be advantaged or penalized for hiring unionized workers. It changes one factor agencies may consider when evaluating offers. - Federal agencies and the Department of Defense: Contracting officials would be prohibited from writing requirements or scoring bids that reward use of workers under collective bargaining agreements. - Workers covered by collective bargaining agreements and unions: Being subject to a collective bargaining agreement would no longer be a basis for a contracting preference in federal procurements.

## Cosponsors (4)

- Rep. Womack, Steve [R-AR-3] (R-AR), 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Rutherford, John H. [R-FL-5] (R-FL), 2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Bergman, Jack [R-MI-1] (R-MI), 2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Jackson, Ronny [R-TX-13] (R-TX), 2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

## Provisions PRIA read

- No union preference in federal contracting: mixed, medium. If enacted, the bill would prevent the head of an executive agency and the Secretary of Defense from requiring a bidder to use union workers. It would also bar agencies from giving extra preference to bidders that use workers covered by a collective bargaining agreement. This would mainly affect fi…

## Related bills

- 119-hr-3151: SHIPS for America Act of 2025
- 119-hr-9298: Stopping Harmful and Outrageous Torts Act
- 119-hr-1262: Mikaela Naylon Give Kids a Chance Act
- 119-hr-21: Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
- 119-hr-842: Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act
- 119-hr-3514: Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act of 2025

## Sources
- [119-hr-10250 on Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/10250)

## Related
- [119-hr-3151: SHIPS for America Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-3151)
- [119-hr-9298: Stopping Harmful and Outrageous Torts Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-9298)
- [119-hr-1262: Mikaela Naylon Give Kids a Chance Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-1262)
- [119-hr-21: Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-21)
- [119-hr-842: Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage A…](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-842)
- [119-hr-3514: Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-3514)
- [All bills in Congress](https://policyrisk.com/legislation)

Source: PRIA, https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-10250 (as of 2026-09-17).