# 119-hr-2110: Safe Vehicle Access for Survivors Act

119-hr-2110, Safe Vehicle Access for Survivors Act, is a 119th Congress bill sponsored by Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6] (D-MI); status in_committee; PRIA reads it as touching household money (as of 2026-10-30).

- Canonical: https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-2110
- As of: 2026-10-30
- Plain-text twin of the page above; the HTML and this file carry the same facts.

## Facts
- Bill: 119-hr-2110
- Congress: 119
- Title: Safe Vehicle Access for Survivors Act
- Status: in_committee
- Introduced: 2025-03-14
- Sponsor: Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6] (D-MI)
- Cosponsors: 28
- Policy area: Science, Technology, Communications
- Touches household money: yes
- Last recorded action: 2026-10-30

## Summary

**Disconnecting abusers from vehicle-connected services.** This bill would let survivors request that vehicle manufacturers or service providers disable or terminate a connected vehicle account or access that an abuser uses to threaten, monitor, or control them.

## Cosponsors (28)

- Rep. Crenshaw, Dan [R-TX-2] (R-TX), 2025-03-14T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Min, Dave [D-CA-47] (D-CA), 2025-03-14T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Thanedar, Shri [D-MI-13] (D-MI), 2025-03-14T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Ross, Deborah K. [D-NC-2] (D-NC), 2025-03-14T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-12] (D-MI), 2025-03-14T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Salinas, Andrea [D-OR-6] (D-OR), 2025-03-14T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" [D-GA-4] (D-GA), 2025-03-14T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1] (D-NV), 2025-03-14T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Gottheimer, Josh [D-NJ-5] (D-NJ), 2025-03-14T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4] (D-WI), 2025-03-14T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Sewell, Terri A. [D-AL-7] (D-AL), 2025-03-14T00:00:00.000Z
- Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large] (D-DC), 2025-03-14T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Stevens, Haley M. [D-MI-11] (D-MI), 2025-03-14T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Moulton, Seth [D-MA-6] (D-MA), 2025-03-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Schrier, Kim [D-WA-8] (D-WA), 2025-03-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Lee, Summer L. [D-PA-12] (D-PA), 2025-03-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1] (R-PA), 2025-03-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Peters, Scott H. [D-CA-50] (D-CA), 2025-03-27T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Friedman, Laura [D-CA-30] (D-CA), 2025-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. McDonald Rivet, Kristen [D-MI-8] (D-MI), 2025-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Sykes, Emilia Strong [D-OH-13] (D-OH), 2025-04-03T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Soto, Darren [D-FL-9] (D-FL), 2025-04-03T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Landsman, Greg [D-OH-1] (D-OH), 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. McBride, Sarah [D-DE-At Large] (D-DE), 2025-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Mullin, Kevin [D-CA-15] (D-CA), 2025-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Simon, Lateefah [D-CA-12] (D-CA), 2026-10-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Norcross, Donald [D-NJ-1] (D-NJ), 2026-03-09T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2] (D-WI), 2026-03-26T00:00:00.000Z

## Provisions PRIA read

- New tools for survivors to cut access: benefit, medium. If enacted, a survivor could ask a covered vehicle provider to disable or remove an abuser's connected-vehicle access. Providers would have to act within 2 business days and could disable an account, cut services to the vehicle, or give instructions to disable services inside the car. Providers cou…
- FCC rulemaking to set standards: benefit, medium. If enacted, the Federal Communications Commission would start rulemaking within 180 days and finish rules within 2 years. The rules would guide how providers handle survivor requests, protect confidentiality, remove or limit stored sensitive data, and set reporting and notification processes. The F…
- Legal shield for providers' actions: cost, medium. If enacted, covered providers and their officers, employees, vendors, and agents would be protected from legal claims for actions or omissions made to comply with the Act. The shield would cover claims that arise from implementing the Act's requirements.
- Federal rules override state laws: mixed, medium. If enacted, the Act would preempt state and local laws on the same topics and related rules. That would create a single national standard for covered providers and could remove stronger state protections in some places. The preemption favors uniform provider obligations but may reduce local options…

## Related bills

- 119-hr-909: Crime Victims Fund Stabilization Act of 2025
- 119-hr-7973: Momnibus Act
- 119-hr-20: Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025
- 119-hr-1589: American Dream and Promise Act of 2025
- 119-hr-17: Paycheck Fairness Act
- 119-hr-1810: Safe Schools Improvement Act

## Sources
- [119-hr-2110 on Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/2110)

## Related
- [119-hr-909: Crime Victims Fund Stabilization Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-909)
- [119-hr-7973: Momnibus Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-7973)
- [119-hr-20: Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-20)
- [119-hr-1589: American Dream and Promise Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-1589)
- [119-hr-17: Paycheck Fairness Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-17)
- [119-hr-1810: Safe Schools Improvement Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-1810)
- [All bills in Congress](https://policyrisk.com/legislation)

Source: PRIA, https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-2110 (as of 2026-10-30).