# 119-hr-3374: Pink Tax Repeal Act

119-hr-3374, Pink Tax Repeal Act, is a 119th Congress bill sponsored by Rep. Torres, Norma J. [D-CA-35] (D-CA); status introduced; PRIA reads it as touching household money (as of 2026-04-21).

- Canonical: https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-3374
- As of: 2026-04-21
- Plain-text twin of the page above; the HTML and this file carry the same facts.

## Facts
- Bill: 119-hr-3374
- Congress: 119
- Title: Pink Tax Repeal Act
- Status: introduced
- Introduced: 2025-05-13
- Sponsor: Rep. Torres, Norma J. [D-CA-35] (D-CA)
- Cosponsors: 27
- Policy area: Commerce
- Touches household money: yes
- Last recorded action: 2026-04-21

## Summary

**Ban on gender-based pricing.** This bill would make it unlawful to charge different prices for substantially similar consumer products or for substantially similar services based on the gender the items or services are marketed to. - Consumers and families: Would stop different prices for similar products aimed at different genders. A difference in coloring would not count as a substantial difference. - Manufacturers and retailers: Would have to price "substantially similar" products the same when there are no substantial differences in materials, intended use, or functional design and features. Covered consumer products include those in the Consumer Product Safety Act and items like devices, cosmetics, and certain child restraint systems. - Service providers: Would be barred from charging different rates for services that are substantially similar in time, difficulty, or cost to provide. - Enforcement and states: Would treat violations as unfair or deceptive acts under the Federal Trade Commission Act and let the Federal Trade Commission use its full enforcement powers and penalties. State attorneys general could sue on behalf of residents after notifying the FTC 10 days before filing, and the FTC may intervene in state suits.

## Cosponsors (27)

- Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14] (D-FL), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large] (D-DC), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Kelly, Robin L. [D-IL-2] (D-IL), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Watson Coleman, Bonnie [D-NJ-12] (D-NJ), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Brownley, Julia [D-CA-26] (D-CA), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4] (D-WI), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2] (D-MA), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila [D-FL-20] (D-FL), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Frankel, Lois [D-FL-22] (D-FL), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Jayapal, Pramila [D-WA-7] (D-WA), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1] (D-NV), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Dean, Madeleine [D-PA-4] (D-PA), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Beyer, Donald S. [D-VA-8] (D-VA), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" [D-GA-4] (D-GA), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-25] (D-FL), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Khanna, Ro [D-CA-17] (D-CA), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-28] (D-CA), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Beatty, Joyce [D-OH-3] (D-OH), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Omar, Ilhan [D-MN-5] (D-MN), 2025-05-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Cisneros, Gilbert Ray [D-CA-31] (D-CA), 2025-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Sykes, Emilia Strong [D-OH-13] (D-OH), 2025-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Hayes, Jahana [D-CT-5] (D-CT), 2025-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. McDonald Rivet, Kristen [D-MI-8] (D-MI), 2025-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9] (D-TN), 2025-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. García, Jesús G. "Chuy" [D-IL-4] (D-IL), 2025-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6] (D-MI), 2025-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Ross, Deborah K. [D-NC-2] (D-NC), 2025-07-10T00:00:00.000Z

## Provisions PRIA read

- FTC and states enforce pricing ban: benefit, medium. If enacted, the FTC would enforce the pricing ban using its usual powers and penalties. States could sue on behalf of residents for orders, damages, or refunds. A state attorney general would give the FTC 10 days’ notice before filing, or notify right after if earlier is not feasible. The FTC could…
- Stop gender-based pricing for products and services: benefit, low. This bill would ban charging different prices by gender for similar products or services. For products, the two items must be from the same maker. Substantially similar products would have no big differences in materials, use, or function. Color alone would not count. For services, similar time, di…

## Related bills

- 119-hr-7973: Momnibus Act
- 119-hr-20: Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025
- 119-hr-5390: FAMILY Act
- 119-hr-15: Equality Act
- 119-hr-1589: American Dream and Promise Act of 2025
- 119-hr-12: Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025

## Sources
- [119-hr-3374 on Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/3374)

## Related
- [119-hr-7973: Momnibus Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-7973)
- [119-hr-20: Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-20)
- [119-hr-5390: FAMILY Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-5390)
- [119-hr-15: Equality Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-15)
- [119-hr-1589: American Dream and Promise Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-1589)
- [119-hr-12: Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-12)
- [All bills in Congress](https://policyrisk.com/legislation)

Source: PRIA, https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-3374 (as of 2026-04-21).