# 119-hr-4123: FIT Procurement Act

119-hr-4123, FIT Procurement Act, is a 119th Congress bill sponsored by Rep. Burlison, Eric [R-MO-7] (R-MO); status passed_house; PRIA reads it as touching household money (as of 2026-08-07).

- Canonical: https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-4123
- As of: 2026-08-07
- Plain-text twin of the page above; the HTML and this file carry the same facts.

## Facts
- Bill: 119-hr-4123
- Congress: 119
- Title: FIT Procurement Act
- Status: passed_house
- Introduced: 2025-06-25
- Sponsor: Rep. Burlison, Eric [R-MO-7] (R-MO)
- Cosponsors: 3
- Policy area: Government Operations and Politics
- Touches household money: yes
- Last recorded action: 2026-08-07

## Summary

**Modernizing federal tech procurement** is the core goal of the FIT Procurement Act. It updates how agencies buy information and communications technology and revamps training for the people who buy it. - Federal acquisition workforce: Creates an experiential-learning pilot and a required cross-functional ICT acquisition training program covering market research, contracting, cloud, AI, and cybersecurity. Training must be available within 18 months and the Acquisition Workforce Training Fund share rises to 7.5%. - Faster purchases and higher thresholds: Raises the Simplified Acquisition Threshold to $500,000 and increases simplified procedures for small purchases to $10,000,000 to speed procurement of commercial off-the-shelf and subscription ICT. - More competition and small-business focus: Requires guidance and a Council to remove unnecessary barriers within 90 days and directs a GAO report on small-business participation within 18 months.

## Cosponsors (3)

- Rep. Subramanyam, Suhas [D-VA-10] (D-VA), 2025-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13] (R-FL), 2025-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Lynch, Stephen F. [D-MA-8] (D-MA), 2025-06-25T00:00:00.000Z

## Provisions PRIA read

- Fairer, easier bidding for small firms: benefit, medium. If enacted, a top council would have 90 days to find and remove contract steps that block small firms. It would seek public input, including from APEX Accelerators, and fixes would be put in place within 2 years. Within 1 year, guidance would tell agencies to accept more kinds of past performance a…
- Higher limits for simple federal buys: benefit, medium. If enacted, federal micro-purchases would rise to $25,000 (from $10,000). The simplified acquisition threshold would increase to $500,000 (from $250,000). The cap for simplified small‑purchase procedures would rise to $10,000,000 (from $5,000,000). These changes would apply upon enactment and would…
- Less pricing paperwork on subcontracts: benefit, medium. If enacted, fewer subcontracts would need detailed cost or pricing data. For prime contracts made after June 30, 2026, a subcontract would trigger submission only if over $10,000,000. For prime contracts made on or before that date, the trigger would stay over $2,000,000. Other related thresholds w…
- Stronger tech buying training for staff: benefit, medium. If enacted, the Federal Acquisition Institute would launch an ICT buying training program within 18 months. It would cover market research, requirements, cloud, AI, and cybersecurity, and include case studies and hands‑on learning. An experiential‑learning pilot would also start within 18 months, a…
- Easier buying of cloud subscriptions: benefit, low. If enacted, agencies could treat ICT subscriptions, reservations, or tenancy as allowable miscellaneous charges. This would make it easier to buy cloud and shared computing services, with agency‑set access and security. Vendors who sell subscription‑based ICT could see more orders. The change would…
- Higher dollar triggers for major programs: mixed, medium. If enacted, the dollar levels that define “major” programs would rise to $275 million and $1.3 billion (from $75 million and $300 million). More programs would avoid extra “major program” oversight, easing work for some managers and vendors. But fewer programs would get that added scrutiny, which c…
- No new funding for these changes: mixed, low. If enacted, no new funds would be authorized to carry out this Act. Agencies would need to use existing money or shift funds, which could slow rollouts. Taxpayers would see the changes pursued without new spending authority. This would take effect upon enactment.

## Related bills

- 119-hr-3151: SHIPS for America Act of 2025
- 119-hr-8324: Great American Healthcare Plan
- 119-hr-5438: Incentivize Savings Act
- 119-hr-7977: Energy Bills Relief Act
- 119-hr-9298: Stopping Harmful and Outrageous Torts Act
- 119-hr-21: Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act

## Sources
- [119-hr-4123 on Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4123)

## Related
- [119-hr-3151: SHIPS for America Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-3151)
- [119-hr-8324: Great American Healthcare Plan](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-8324)
- [119-hr-5438: Incentivize Savings Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-5438)
- [119-hr-7977: Energy Bills Relief Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-7977)
- [119-hr-9298: Stopping Harmful and Outrageous Torts Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-9298)
- [119-hr-21: Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-21)
- [All bills in Congress](https://policyrisk.com/legislation)

Source: PRIA, https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-4123 (as of 2026-08-07).