# 119-hr-462: No Support for Terror Act

119-hr-462, No Support for Terror Act, is a 119th Congress bill sponsored by Rep. Steube, W. Gregory [R-FL-17] (R-FL); status introduced; PRIA reads it as touching household money (as of 2026-09-21).

- Canonical: https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-462
- As of: 2026-09-21
- Plain-text twin of the page above; the HTML and this file carry the same facts.

## Facts
- Bill: 119-hr-462
- Congress: 119
- Title: No Support for Terror Act
- Status: introduced
- Introduced: 2025-01-15
- Sponsor: Rep. Steube, W. Gregory [R-FL-17] (R-FL)
- Cosponsors: 0
- Policy area: Foreign Trade and International Finance
- Touches household money: yes
- Last recorded action: 2026-09-21

## Summary

**Stop U.S. funds and international allocations from supporting genocide perpetrators or state sponsors of terrorism.** This bill would tighten checks on U.S. overseas aid to stop money from reaching terrorist groups while pushing international finance rules to exclude bad actors. - Would direct the Treasury to instruct the U.S. Executive Director at the International Monetary Fund to oppose Special Drawing Rights allocations to countries that are perpetrators of genocide or state sponsors of terrorism and to advocate an IMF rule barring such allocations. - Would require the Departments of the Treasury and State and the U.S. Agency for International Development to jointly review assistance to nongovernmental and international organizations to ensure aid is not passed to the Taliban or other terrorist groups and to report results to Congress within 90 days. - Would require prime awardees of U.S. assistance to provide evidence, within 180 days, that all sub-awardees comply with U.S. anti-terrorism financing laws.

## Provisions PRIA read

- Tighter checks on U.S. aid recipients: benefit, medium. If enacted, Treasury, State, and USAID would jointly review U.S. aid to nonprofits and international groups. The review would check if funds are passed to the Taliban, other terrorist groups, or countries that harbor them. They would send Congress a joint report within 90 days after enactment. With…
- Oppose IMF reserve credits for terror states: benefit, low. If enacted, Treasury would tell the U.S. director at the IMF to oppose new reserve credits for certain countries. The U.S. would vote against allocations to any country found to commit genocide or listed as a state sponsor of terrorism by the Secretary of State. The U.S. would also push the IMF to…

## Related bills

- 119-hr-4669: FEMA Act of 2025
- 119-hr-2570: Maximum Pressure Act
- 119-hr-9109: Stop ANTIFA Act of 2026
- 119-hr-687: MERIT Act of 2025
- 119-hr-4206: CONNECT for Health Act of 2025
- 119-hr-9298: Stopping Harmful and Outrageous Torts Act

## Sources
- [119-hr-462 on Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/462)

## Related
- [119-hr-4669: FEMA Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-4669)
- [119-hr-2570: Maximum Pressure Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-2570)
- [119-hr-9109: Stop ANTIFA Act of 2026](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-9109)
- [119-hr-687: MERIT Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-687)
- [119-hr-4206: CONNECT for Health Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-4206)
- [119-hr-9298: Stopping Harmful and Outrageous Torts Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-9298)
- [All bills in Congress](https://policyrisk.com/legislation)

Source: PRIA, https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-462 (as of 2026-09-21).