# 119-hr-7366: Dietary Supplement Regulatory Uniformity Act

119-hr-7366, Dietary Supplement Regulatory Uniformity Act, is a 119th Congress bill sponsored by Rep. Langworthy, Nicholas A. [R-NY-23] (R-NY); status introduced; PRIA reads it as touching household money (as of 2026-04-21).

- Canonical: https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-7366
- As of: 2026-04-21
- Plain-text twin of the page above; the HTML and this file carry the same facts.

## Facts
- Bill: 119-hr-7366
- Congress: 119
- Title: Dietary Supplement Regulatory Uniformity Act
- Status: introduced
- Introduced: 2026-02-04
- Sponsor: Rep. Langworthy, Nicholas A. [R-NY-23] (R-NY)
- Cosponsors: 0
- Policy area: Health
- Touches household money: yes
- Last recorded action: 2026-04-21

## Summary

**Federal preemption of state dietary supplement requirements** would be the core change. The bill would bar states and localities from imposing requirements that differ from, add to, or are not identical with federal dietary supplement rules and would add new subsections to Section 403A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. - Manufacturers and national brands would face a single federal standard instead of differing state rules, simplifying compliance across states. - State and local governments would be prohibited from keeping or creating dietary supplement rules that are not identical to federal rules. They could apply to the Secretary for an exemption, which must be granted by regulation after notice and a hearing if the state shows the rule is more stringent or addresses a compelling local condition and does not make the product noncompliant with federal law. - Retailers and distributors would likely see fewer conflicting state requirements to track, reducing regulatory complexity for interstate sales.

## Provisions PRIA read

- One federal standard for supplements: mixed, high. If enacted, this bill would bar states and local governments from having different dietary supplement rules than federal law. Companies that make, sell, or ship supplements would follow federal rules instead of varying state rules. States could apply to the Health Secretary for an exemption. The Se…

## Related bills

- 119-hr-3151: SHIPS for America Act of 2025
- 119-hr-4669: FEMA Act of 2025
- 119-hr-2725: Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act of 2025
- 119-hr-2570: Maximum Pressure Act
- 119-hr-4317: PBM Reform Act of 2025
- 119-hr-1229: United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025

## Sources
- [119-hr-7366 on Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/7366)

## Related
- [119-hr-3151: SHIPS for America Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-3151)
- [119-hr-4669: FEMA Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-4669)
- [119-hr-2725: Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-2725)
- [119-hr-2570: Maximum Pressure Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-2570)
- [119-hr-4317: PBM Reform Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-4317)
- [119-hr-1229: United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-1229)
- [All bills in Congress](https://policyrisk.com/legislation)

Source: PRIA, https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-7366 (as of 2026-04-21).
