# 119-hr-9807: Americans vs. Poisonous Pesticides Act

119-hr-9807, Americans vs. Poisonous Pesticides Act, is a 119th Congress bill sponsored by Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13] (R-FL); status introduced; PRIA reads it as touching household money (as of 2026-10-24).

- Canonical: https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-9807
- As of: 2026-10-24
- Plain-text twin of the page above; the HTML and this file carry the same facts.

## Facts
- Bill: 119-hr-9807
- Congress: 119
- Title: Americans vs. Poisonous Pesticides Act
- Status: introduced
- Introduced: 2026-07-21
- Sponsor: Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13] (R-FL)
- Cosponsors: 5
- Policy area: Environmental Protection
- Touches household money: yes
- Last recorded action: 2026-10-24

## Summary

**Preserves states' ability to sue over pesticide misbranding** while letting companies update labels quickly when new health or environmental risks emerge, subject to EPA review or disapproval. The bill keeps state failure-to-warn claims alive, clarifies that federal registration is only prima facie evidence of label compliance, and creates a process for registrants to amend labels based on new information without prior EPA approval.

## Cosponsors (5)

- Rep. Lofgren, Zoe [D-CA-18] (D-CA), 2026-10-22T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. DeLauro, Rosa L. [D-CT-3] (D-CT), 2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4] (R-KY), 2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Pingree, Chellie [D-ME-1] (D-ME), 2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z
- Rep. Subramanyam, Suhas [D-VA-10] (D-VA), 2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

## Provisions PRIA read

- Faster pesticide label updates: benefit, medium. If enacted, a pesticide maker would be allowed to change a product label without waiting for prior EPA approval when the maker or EPA finds new information that a label may be missing health or environmental warnings. The EPA Administrator would still be able to disapprove the label change or take…
- State pesticide claims preserved: mixed, medium. If enacted, the bill would say State law claims that match the federal misbranding rule would not be preempted. Federal registration of a pesticide and federal approval of its label would not be a defense; they would be prima facie evidence (not conclusive) that the product met the law. The amendme…

## Related bills

- 119-hr-2102: Major Richard Star Act
- 119-hres-23: Proxy Voting for New Parents Resolution
- 119-hr-2253: Puppy Protection Act of 2025
- 119-hr-1661: SAFE Act of 2025
- 119-hr-1993: 25th Anniversary of 9/11 Commemorative Coin Act
- 119-hr-1262: Mikaela Naylon Give Kids a Chance Act

## Sources
- [119-hr-9807 on Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/9807)

## Related
- [119-hr-2102: Major Richard Star Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-2102)
- [119-hres-23: Proxy Voting for New Parents Resolution](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hres-23)
- [119-hr-2253: Puppy Protection Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-2253)
- [119-hr-1661: SAFE Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-1661)
- [119-hr-1993: 25th Anniversary of 9/11 Commemorative Coin Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-1993)
- [119-hr-1262: Mikaela Naylon Give Kids a Chance Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-1262)
- [All bills in Congress](https://policyrisk.com/legislation)

Source: PRIA, https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-9807 (as of 2026-10-24).