# 119-hres-282: Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

119-hres-282, Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes., is a 119th Congress bill sponsored by Rep. Griffith, H. Morgan [R-VA-9] (R-VA); status failed; PRIA reads it as touching household money (as of 2025-12-21).

- Canonical: https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hres-282
- As of: 2025-12-21
- Plain-text twin of the page above; the HTML and this file carry the same facts.

## Facts
- Bill: 119-hres-282
- Congress: 119
- Title: Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
- Status: failed
- Introduced: 2025-04-01
- Sponsor: Rep. Griffith, H. Morgan [R-VA-9] (R-VA)
- Cosponsors: 0
- Policy area: Congress
- Touches household money: yes
- Last recorded action: 2025-12-21

## Summary

**Sets House floor rules to fast-track consideration of four specific measures and limit routine procedural challenges.** It would shorten debate windows, waive many points of order, and control how each listed bill is read and amended on the floor. - Members of the House: Debate on each targeted measure would be limited to 1 hour, split equally between the committee chair and the ranking minority member, and each measure would allow one motion to commit or recommit. - Committees and sponsors: The resolution waives points of order against consideration and against provisions in the bills and treats H.R. 1526 as read while adopting the Judiciary Committee's substitute, reducing procedural hurdles for those measures. - Discharge process: It bars certain motions to discharge committees for resolutions substantially like specified House resolutions and removes disallowed discharge motions from the calendar, narrowing paths to force floor consideration.

## Votes

| Date | Chamber | Question | Result | Yea | Nay |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2025-04-01T00:00:00.000Z | house | On Ordering the Previous Question | Passed | 215 | 213 |
| 2025-04-01T00:00:00.000Z | house | On Agreeing to the Resolution | Failed | 206 | 222 |

## Provisions PRIA read

- Require proof of citizenship to vote: cost, high. Had it passed, the resolution would have let the House quickly consider H.R. 22. H.R. 22 sought to change the national voter registration law to require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections. The rule would have waived points of order, treated the bill as read, and limi…
- Limit courts' power to issue injunctions: mixed, medium. Had it passed, the resolution would have made it in order to consider H.R. 1526 quickly. H.R. 1526 sought to amend federal law to limit district courts' authority to issue injunctions. The resolution would have waived points of order, treated the Judiciary Committee substitute as adopted, considere…
- Vote to overturn payment-app rule: mixed, medium. Had it passed, the resolution would have allowed the House to take up S.J. Res. 28 quickly. S.J. Res. 28 sought to disapprove a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rule about which digital payment apps count as "larger participants." The rule change could have shifted oversight for big payment app…
- Block discharge motions and table resolutions: mixed, low. Had it passed, the resolution would have laid House Resolution 23 and House Resolution 164 on the table, removing them from immediate consideration. It would also have barred motions to discharge committees that were substantially the same as House Resolution 23 and barred similar motions to discha…

## Related bills

- 119-hr-8413: SECURE Data Act
- 119-hr-9298: Stopping Harmful and Outrageous Torts Act
- 119-hr-278: BROADBAND Leadership Act
- 119-hr-7212: Hemp Enforcement, Modernization, and Protection Act
- 119-hr-3235: MOMS Act
- 119-hr-10204: Legislative Branch Agencies Clarification Act

## Sources
- [119-hres-282 on Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-resolution/282)

## Related
- [119-hr-8413: SECURE Data Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-8413)
- [119-hr-9298: Stopping Harmful and Outrageous Torts Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-9298)
- [119-hr-278: BROADBAND Leadership Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-278)
- [119-hr-7212: Hemp Enforcement, Modernization, and Protection Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-7212)
- [119-hr-3235: MOMS Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-3235)
- [119-hr-10204: Legislative Branch Agencies Clarification Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hr-10204)
- [All bills in Congress](https://policyrisk.com/legislation)

Source: PRIA, https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-hres-282 (as of 2025-12-21).