# 119-s-2150: Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025

119-s-2150, Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025, is a 119th Congress bill sponsored by Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI] (D-WI); status introduced; PRIA reads it as touching household money (as of 2026-10-30).

- Canonical: https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-s-2150
- As of: 2026-10-30
- Plain-text twin of the page above; the HTML and this file carry the same facts.

## Facts
- Bill: 119-s-2150
- Congress: 119
- Title: Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025
- Status: introduced
- Introduced: 2025-06-24
- Sponsor: Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI] (D-WI)
- Cosponsors: 46
- Policy area: Health
- Touches household money: yes
- Last recorded action: 2026-10-30

## Summary

**Guarantee nationwide protections for a person's right to obtain abortion services and a provider's right to deliver them.** The Women's Health Protection Act of 2025 would create a federal rule that stops laws and rules that single out abortion or place heavier burdens on abortion than on similar medical procedures. It defines key terms, protects pre-viability care, allows post-viability care to protect life or health, and explicitly protects interstate travel and the movement of medicines, equipment, patients, and providers. - Families and patients: Would protect access to abortion before viability and allow post-viability care when needed to protect life or health. It would bar medically unnecessary in-person visit rules and stop forced disclosure of why a patient seeks care. - Health care providers: Would protect providers' ability to give abortion care including by telemedicine and across state lines, and would forbid facility, staffing, testing, or disclosure requirements that are not required for similar procedures. - States and interstate commerce: Would preempt conflicting state laws and recognize a right to travel and to assist others in getting reproductive health services across state lines. - Courts and enforcement: Would let the Attorney General sue and would create a private right of action so patients and providers can seek injunctive relief and attorney's fees. It would limit state sovereign immunity where federal law allows challenges.

## Cosponsors (46)

- Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT] (D-CT), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Schumer, Charles E. [D-NY] (D-NY), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA] (D-WA), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL] (D-IL), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Alsobrooks, Angela D. [D-MD] (D-MD), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO] (D-CO), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Blunt Rochester, Lisa [D-DE] (D-DE), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ] (D-NJ), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Cantwell, Maria [D-WA] (D-WA), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE] (D-DE), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV] (D-NV), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Duckworth, Tammy [D-IL] (D-IL), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Fetterman, John [D-PA] (D-PA), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Gallego, Ruben [D-AZ] (D-AZ), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Gillibrand, Kirsten E. [D-NY] (D-NY), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Hassan, Margaret Wood [D-NH] (D-NH), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Heinrich, Martin [D-NM] (D-NM), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Hickenlooper, John W. [D-CO] (D-CO), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-HI] (D-HI), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA] (D-VA), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Kelly, Mark [D-AZ] (D-AZ), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Kim, Andy [D-NJ] (D-NJ), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. King, Angus S., Jr. [I-ME] (I-ME), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN] (D-MN), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Luján, Ben Ray [D-NM] (D-NM), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA] (D-MA), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR] (D-OR), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Murphy, Christopher [D-CT] (D-CT), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Ossoff, Jon [D-GA] (D-GA), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA] (D-CA), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI] (D-MI), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Reed, Jack [D-RI] (D-RI), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Rosen, Jacky [D-NV] (D-NV), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT] (I-VT), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Schatz, Brian [D-HI] (D-HI), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Schiff, Adam B. [D-CA] (D-CA), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH] (D-NH), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Slotkin, Elissa [D-MI] (D-MI), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Smith, Tina [D-MN] (D-MN), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD] (D-MD), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Warner, Mark R. [D-VA] (D-VA), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Warnock, Raphael G. [D-GA] (D-GA), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Warren, Elizabeth [D-MA] (D-MA), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Welch, Peter [D-VT] (D-VT), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI] (D-RI), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR] (D-OR), 2025-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

## Provisions PRIA read

- Federal protections for abortion care: benefit, high. If enacted, you would be able to get abortion care before fetal viability without state rules that single out abortion. Providers could give abortions after viability when, in their good-faith medical judgment, it is needed to protect the patient's life or health. The bill would bar residency bans,…
- Federal preemption of conflicting laws: benefit, high. If enacted, the bill would make its protections override any federal or State law that conflicts with it. Federal and State officials would be prohibited from enforcing laws that conflict with the Act. The bill preserves specific exceptions, such as clinic access laws and certain insurance and cont…
- Stronger federal enforcement and court tests: benefit, high. This bill would let the Attorney General sue in federal court and let individuals and providers sue States or officials to stop laws that violate the Act. Plaintiffs would not have to exhaust state remedies and courts could enjoin enforcement and award costs and reasonable lawyer fees to winners. T…
- Right to travel for reproductive care: benefit, medium. If enacted, you would be able to travel to another State to get reproductive health services, including abortion. You would also be able to assist another person to travel for such care. These travel and assistance rights would take effect upon enactment.

## Related bills

- 119-s-5108: Right to IVF Act of 2026
- 119-s-1503: Equality Act
- 119-s-2523: John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
- 119-s-1115: Paycheck Fairness Act
- 119-s-3214: Background Check Expansion Act
- 119-s-3071: Keep SNAP and WIC Funded Act of 2025

## Sources
- [119-s-2150 on Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/2150)

## Related
- [119-s-5108: Right to IVF Act of 2026](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-s-5108)
- [119-s-1503: Equality Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-s-1503)
- [119-s-2523: John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-s-2523)
- [119-s-1115: Paycheck Fairness Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-s-1115)
- [119-s-3214: Background Check Expansion Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-s-3214)
- [119-s-3071: Keep SNAP and WIC Funded Act of 2025](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-s-3071)
- [All bills in Congress](https://policyrisk.com/legislation)

Source: PRIA, https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-s-2150 (as of 2026-10-30).