# 119-s-387: Small Business Regulatory Reduction Act

119-s-387, Small Business Regulatory Reduction Act, is a 119th Congress bill sponsored by Sen. Marshall, Roger [R-KS] (R-KS); status introduced; PRIA reads it as touching household money (as of 2026-09-10).

- Canonical: https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-s-387
- As of: 2026-09-10
- Plain-text twin of the page above; the HTML and this file carry the same facts.

## Facts
- Bill: 119-s-387
- Congress: 119
- Title: Small Business Regulatory Reduction Act
- Status: introduced
- Introduced: 2025-02-04
- Sponsor: Sen. Marshall, Roger [R-KS] (R-KS)
- Cosponsors: 0
- Policy area: Commerce
- Touches household money: yes
- Last recorded action: 2026-09-10

## Summary

**Caps SBA rulemaking costs per small business at zero.** The bill would require the Small Business Administration to ensure the small business regulatory budget for each small business concern is not greater than 0 beginning in fiscal year 2026 and to submit annual, agency-disaggregated reports to Congress on other federal rules that affect small businesses. - Small businesses: Would block SBA rulemaking that increases the per-business regulatory cost, setting a $0 cap on those costs starting in FY2026. This covers new rules and changes to existing rules. - Small Business Administration: The Administrator would need to measure and certify those zero-cost budgets and produce an initial report 60 days after the end of FY2025 and annual reports after that. - Congress and oversight: Congress would receive an annual, agency-by-agency list of federal rules that had impacts on small business concerns. - Funding: The bill does not authorize any additional funds, so implementation is required without new appropriations.

## Provisions PRIA read

- Zero cap on SBA rule costs: benefit, medium. If enacted, the bill would define terms like "Administrator", "rule", and "small business concern" when enacted. It would require the SBA to make sure the small business regulatory budget for each small business concern is not greater than zero starting in fiscal year 2026 and every year after. The…
- No new funds to implement bill: mixed, low. If enacted, the bill would say no additional funds are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act. This would limit agencies from getting new appropriations to implement the bill. The effect on households and businesses would be indirect and depend on how agencies choose to use existing bu…

## Related bills

- 119-s-4952: Protecting American Taxpayers Act
- 119-s-4378: Protecting American Taxpayers Act
- 119-s-3903: Railway Safety Act of 2026
- 119-s-1748: Kids Online Safety Act
- 119-s-3265: Improve and Enhance the Work Opportunity Tax Credit Act
- 119-s-2140: Haskell Indian Nations University Improvement Act

## Sources
- [119-s-387 on Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/387)

## Related
- [119-s-4952: Protecting American Taxpayers Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-s-4952)
- [119-s-4378: Protecting American Taxpayers Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-s-4378)
- [119-s-3903: Railway Safety Act of 2026](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-s-3903)
- [119-s-1748: Kids Online Safety Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-s-1748)
- [119-s-3265: Improve and Enhance the Work Opportunity Tax Credit Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-s-3265)
- [119-s-2140: Haskell Indian Nations University Improvement Act](https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-s-2140)
- [All bills in Congress](https://policyrisk.com/legislation)

Source: PRIA, https://policyrisk.com/legislation/119-s-387 (as of 2026-09-10).
