2026-09944NoticeWallet

Feds Tweak Bank Safety Ratings Again

Published Date: 5/19/2026

Notice

Summary

The FFIEC is updating the CAMELS rating system that checks how safe and sound banks and financial institutions are. These changes will make ratings clearer and focus more on real risks to money safety. If you want to share your thoughts, send comments by August 17, 2026—this could affect how banks are judged and managed going forward.

Analyzed Economic Effects

6 provisions identified: 5 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.

No More ‘‘Special’’ Management Weighting

The proposal would remove the sentence that gives the Management component ``special consideration'' when assigning CAMELS composite ratings. CAMELS composite and component ratings remain on a 1-to-5 scale, and removing this language is intended to make composite ratings consider all components more evenly.

Tighter Management Rating Rules

The proposal would narrow the Management component's evaluation factors to material risk-management items and remove factors like ‘‘management depth and succession,’’ responsiveness to audit/supervisory recommendations, and community-serving willingness. It would also set a material financial risk threshold for assigning Management ratings of 3 or worse and permit such ratings for unreliable reporting, failure to safeguard assets, or significant noncompliance.

Limit Specialty Review Effects on Ratings

Specialty review findings (for areas like Consumer Compliance, BSA/AML, Information Systems, Trust, etc.) would only influence CAMELS component or composite ratings if they impact a firm's overall financial condition, represent material financial risks, or reflect significant noncompliance with law or regulation.

Clearer Rules Could Lower Costs and Boost Lending

The agencies expect the changes could let institutions use management time and resources more efficiently and give clearer supervisory expectations, potentially reducing compliance costs. The proposal also says that by avoiding downgrades tied to immaterial process issues, the framework could support increased credit availability.

Risk of Deprioritizing Some Controls

The agencies acknowledge potential costs: management at some firms might deprioritize risk-management practices not seen as drivers of CAMELS ratings, which could delay remediation and, if risks later become material, lead to higher costs or losses. They also note a small chance the revisions could miscalibrate ratings and reduce their information content.

Narrowing What Examiners May Consider

The proposal would remove the phrase ‘‘but not limited to’’ from component descriptions and require that any additional evaluation factors be used only in exceptional circumstances. Examiners would have to document why extra factors were critical and focus on material financial risks.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this regulation affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this federal register document and every other regulation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Key Dates

Published Date
Comments Due
5/19/2026
8/17/2026

Department and Agencies

Department
Independent Agency
Agency
Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council
Source: View HTML

Related Federal Register Documents

Previous / Next Documents

Back to Federal Register