All Roll Calls
Yes: 536 • No: 525
Sponsored By: Representative Arrington
Resolving Differences
A 10-year budget blueprint that sets revenue, spending, deficit, and debt targets for fiscal years 2025–2034 and lays out enforcement rules, committee allocations, and broad policy priorities to guide Congress.
*Sets a goal to cut mandatory spending by $2.0 trillion over the budget window, a deficit‑reducing target aimed at addressing a projected FY2025 deficit of $1.9 trillion and a national debt above $36.0 trillion.*
Personalized for You
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
7 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 6 mixed.
If adopted by both chambers, the Senate Budget Chair would be able to adjust budget numbers to help pass bills that protect and improve Medicaid and extend Medicare Part A’s trust fund. Any use of this reserve would need to avoid increasing the deficit over 2025–2034. This tool would make it easier to move deficit-neutral bills that keep care in place for vulnerable people.
If adopted by both chambers, House and Senate committees would need to send budget change plans by May 9, 2025 for 2025–2034. The House sets a goal to cut $2.0 trillion in mandatory spending over that period. If House authorizing committees fall short, the House Budget Chair would lower the Ways and Means instruction by the shortfall (starting from a $4.5 trillion deficit increase instruction). The House would direct Ways and Means to include a $4.0 trillion debt limit increase. The Senate Finance Committee would need to report debt limit changes by May 16, 2025, capped at $5.0 trillion.
If adopted by both chambers, this resolution would set yearly budget totals for 2025–2034 that Congress would use to enforce the budget. For 2025, it would use about $3.70 trillion in revenues, $4.64 trillion in outlays, and a deficit near $0.94 trillion. It would count Social Security and Postal Service administrative costs in House and Senate allocations and enforcement. In the Senate, it would set specific Social Security trust fund numbers each year (for 2025: revenues about $1.304 trillion, outlays about $1.414 trillion) and SSA admin amounts (about $6.4 billion). It would also set Postal Service admin amounts (about $268 million in 2025). Budget chairs could update allocations to match CBO baseline changes and would publish those updates in the Congressional Record.
If adopted by both chambers, budget chairs could adjust allocations to fit reconciliation bills that follow this plan’s rules. The Senate Budget Chair could also adjust numbers for bills that cut the deficit by more than $2.0 trillion over 10 years (2025–2034). The Chair could make room for deregulatory bills, as long as they do not increase the deficit over 2025–2029 or 2025–2034. These tools change the process but do not by themselves change benefits or taxes.
If adopted by both chambers, the House would state its policy to boost growth by cutting federal spending, expanding energy, lowering some taxes, and reducing red tape. It would also call for scaling back costly regulations, including with reconciliation tools. These are policy directions only and would need later bills to take effect.
If adopted by both chambers, Title IV would become part of each chamber’s rules, for enforcing this budget plan. These rules would apply unless each chamber later changes them. This affects how Congress runs the budget but does not itself change taxes or benefits.
If adopted by both chambers, the Senate Budget Chair could adjust budget numbers for bills that use revised tax assumptions. This could include treating extensions of parts of the 2017 tax law as the baseline to help avoid tax increases on working families and small businesses. Any use of this reserve could not raise the deficit over 2025–2034.
Arrington
TX • R
There are no cosponsors for this bill.
All Roll Calls
Yes: 536 • No: 525
house vote • 4/10/2025
On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment
Yes: 216 • No: 214
senate vote • 4/5/2025
On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 14
Yes: 51 • No: 48
senate vote • 4/3/2025
On the Motion to Proceed H.Con.Res. 14
Yes: 52 • No: 48
house vote • 2/25/2025
On Agreeing to the Resolution, as Amended
Yes: 217 • No: 215
Take It Personal
Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in
HR1 — An act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.
A household-budget shakeup - changing how much help some families get for groceries, and for parents, reshaping the child tax credit and child/dependent care breaks that can move refund sizes and take-home pay, while also tightening some energy incentives and immigration fees and pumping new money into defense, border operations, health, and student aid. - Grocery help & eligibility: Updates the formula used to set SNAP (food stamp) benefits and tweaks work/utility rules—so benefit amounts could shift for some households. It also tightens eligibility for certain immigrants. - Refunds for families: Reworks key family tax breaks—especially the child tax credit and child/dependent care credits—which could change the size and timing of tax refunds (and in some cases take-home pay) for parents. - Energy bills & “made in America” rules: Scales back or ends several clean-energy and manufacturing tax credits and adds tougher domestic-content/foreign-entity limits—changes that can ripple into utility rates, home-upgrade costs, and where new jobs/investment land. - New fees + big funding shifts: Sets new immigration service fee schedules and moves major federal dollars toward defense, border operations, health, and student aid—reshaping who pays fees and where government spending shows up. Raises federal borrowing authority by 5 trillion dollars, and potentially more budget pressure later.
HR4317 — PBM Reform Act of 2025
Greater PBM transparency and tighter contract rules would require pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to disclose detailed per‑drug revenues and rebates, protect small "essential" retail pharmacies, and change Medicaid and group plan payment rules across the drug supply chain. The bill would layer reporting, audit rights, pass‑through pricing, and enforcement across Medicare Part D, ERISA/group plans, and Medicaid to spotlight hidden payments and affiliate flows. - Patients and community pharmacies: Would create an "essential retail pharmacy" label for pharmacies in underserved areas and require network access standards and biennial public data starting in 2028, helping small pharmacies show reimbursement and cost differences to plans. - PBMs, plans, and auditors: Would force PBMs to adopt flat bona fide service fees, disclose per‑drug claims, rebates, retained revenue, and affiliate dispensing shares, and give sponsors audit rights and remedies for improper remuneration. - States and Medicaid programs: Would require monthly national acquisition‑cost surveys, ban spread pricing in State Medicaid contracts, and mandate pass‑through pricing with itemized reporting and penalties for false data. Would increase federal spending for implementation by about $336 million in FY2025 and fund ongoing oversight including a $9 million annual IG appropriation.
HR2395 — SHORT Act
Reclassifies short‑barreled rifles and shotguns under federal law and limits state oversight. The SHORT Act would change the Internal Revenue Code and Title 18 to treat certain short‑barreled weapons differently, create a federal safe harbor for people who comply with Chapter 44, preempt state taxes and registration rules, and require destruction of some National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record entries. - Owners who follow federal Chapter 44 rules would be regarded as meeting any state or local registration or licensing requirement for short‑barreled rifles and shotguns. - States and localities would be barred from imposing taxes other than general sales or use taxes, or from requiring markings, recordkeeping, or registration for short‑barreled rifles and shotguns that affect interstate commerce. - The Attorney General would have to destroy within 365 days certain NFRTR registrations and transfer and maker applications that identify owners or makers of those weapons.
HR1262 — Mikaela Naylon Give Kids a Chance Act
Speeds and strengthens pediatric cancer drug development. It expands which cancer products companies must study in children, reshapes organ transplant network governance and fees, and adds new FDA international and transparency steps. - Children with cancer and researchers: Requires pediatric studies that produce clinically meaningful data on dosing, safety, and early effectiveness and widens the kinds of drug combinations studied. It also sets aside $25 million for pediatric drug studies in each of fiscal years 2026, 2027, and 2028. - Transplant patients and transplant network members: Changes Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network governance and financing by allowing quarterly registration fees, requiring those fees fund OPTN operations, improving electronic health record integration, and calling for a GAO review within two years. - FDA partners and drug makers: Creates an Abraham Accords Office to boost regulatory coordination and technical assistance abroad, and forces more transparency during generic (ANDA) reviews about whether generics are qualitatively and quantitatively the same as listed drugs. It also raises the Medicare Improvement Fund amount from $1.4 billion to $2.6 billion. Increases federal outlays by roughly $1.3 billion, driven by a $1.2 billion boost to the Medicare Improvement Fund and $75 million for pediatric studies, adding to federal spending.
HR21 — Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
Mandates care and penalties for infants born alive after an abortion. This bill would set standards of care, require reporting, create criminal penalties, and allow civil suits when an infant is born alive following an abortion. - Women and families: A woman on whom an abortion is performed may sue anyone who violates the law and recover objectively verifiable medical and psychological damages, punitive damages, and statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion. Courts must award reasonable attorney's fees to prevailing plaintiffs and may award fees to defendants if a suit is frivolous. - Health care practitioners and facility employees: Any practitioner present at a birth resulting from an abortion must exercise the same professional skill, care, and diligence as for any other live-born infant of the same gestational age. Practitioners or employees who know of a failure to comply must immediately report the violation to appropriate State or Federal law enforcement. - Criminal and statutory consequences: Violators face fines, up to 5 years in prison, or both, and anyone who intentionally kills a born-alive infant is punished under the murder statute. The bill also updates chapter headings and adds statutory definitions for "abortion" and "attempt."
HR1383 — Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2025
Extends Secure Rural Schools payment authority and program tools while adding a temporary, targeted adjustment for 2024–2025. The bill would preserve funding pathways for counties with Federal land and keep local project and advisory authorities in place through the late 2020s.