Protect Medicaid Act
Sponsored By: Representative Hudson
Introduced
Summary
Prohibits federal Medicaid payments for the administrative costs of providing health benefits to noncitizens who are not lawful permanent residents and are ineligible on immigration status grounds. The bill would also require a detailed HHS Inspector General report on how States run and fund such programs and on whether supplying drugs to these noncitizens affects drug pricing.
Show full summary
- States: Would be barred from using federal Medicaid funds for administrative costs tied to health benefits for noncitizens without satisfactory immigration status, though federal payments could still cover systems set up to ensure compliance.
- HHS oversight: The HHS Inspector General would have to report to Congress within 180 days on how States separate Medicaid administrative costs from costs for benefits to these noncitizens and on the effectiveness of State compliance procedures.
- State financing and drugs: The report must describe State financing methods such as provider taxes and intergovernmental transfers used for the non‑Federal share and analyze whether covered outpatient drugs provided under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program or the 340B discount program affect the average manufacturer price (AMP).
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.
Ban Medicaid admin funding for ineligible noncitizens
This bill would block federal Medicaid payments for running state programs that give health benefits to some noncitizens without a satisfactory immigration status. It would not change who can get Medicaid. It targets the administrative costs of separate state programs for these noncitizens. States could still get federal payment to set up or run systems that make sure they follow this ban. If enacted, states might have to cover these admin costs themselves or reduce services. If your household includes such a noncitizen, those programs could have less money to manage enrollment and claims. If passed, this would take effect upon enactment.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Hudson
NC • R
Cosponsors
Crenshaw
TX • R
Sponsored 2/11/2025
Knott
NC • R
Sponsored 2/12/2025
Langworthy
NY • R
Sponsored 2/14/2025
Weber (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 2/14/2025
Moore (WV)
WV • R
Sponsored 2/18/2025
Taylor
OH • R
Sponsored 2/24/2025
Tenney
NY • R
Sponsored 2/26/2025
Messmer
IN • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Pfluger
TX • R
Sponsored 3/3/2025
Guthrie
KY • R
Sponsored 3/3/2025
Harrigan
NC • R
Sponsored 3/4/2025
Hageman
WY • R
Sponsored 3/10/2025
Miller-Meeks
IA • R
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Jackson (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Kennedy (UT)
UT • R
Sponsored 4/10/2025
Brecheen
OK • R
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govTake It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in