American Broadband Deployment Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Representative Carter (GA)
In Committee
Summary
Sets strict review deadlines and automatic approvals to speed broadband and cable builds while preserving limited local rights‑of‑way control. It creates clear timelines, tolling rules, and evidence‑based denials so projects can move faster without hidden fees.
Show full summary
- Local governments and franchising authorities must act within set clocks or face a deemed grant. Key deadlines include 60 days for eligible facilities and 120 days for cable franchise actions and franchise changes, and denials must be written with substantial evidence.
- Broadband and cable deployers get faster approvals and clearer rules. The bill expands eligible facilities to cover wireline modifications and small wireless upgrades, adds 60‑day deemed approvals for those requests, and requires FCC implementing rules within 180 days.
- Tribes and environmental review processes are narrowed for covered projects and include a 45‑day tribal response presumption for certain filings; federal NEPA and historic preservation exceptions apply to specified covered projects.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
3 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Faster permits and siting rules for providers
This bill would set short, uniform review clocks for many network siting requests. Covered equipment requests would be decided in 90 days if on eligible support infrastructure or in 150 days otherwise. Personal wireless requests would generally be 60 days for small facilities on existing structures, 90 days for other small sites, 90 days for non-small on existing structures, and 150 days for other non-small sites. The bill would expand the 60-day 'eligible facilities' approval rule to many wireline changes; if officials do not act within 60 days, the request would be treated as approved the next day. It would also define what counts as a covered project, limit how and when a review clock can be paused (initial incompleteness notices, 30/10 day rules, one mutual 30-day pause), ban moratoria and pre-application prerequisites, bar officials from forcing unrelated studies or third-party conduit payments, allow emergency repairs with prompt notice, and stop local rules that discriminate among providers or effectively ban service.
New cable franchise rules for operators
This bill would set strong deadlines and protections for cable franchise applicants and operators. Franchising authorities would have 120 days to approve or deny franchise applications or elimination/modification requests, or the request would be treated as granted the day after 120 days. An operator could terminate a franchise by written notice, effective 90 days after submission, and revocation by the authority would be allowed only for willful, material failures after a chance to cure. Transfers to new parties would be allowed if the transferee accepts existing terms, and an authority that acquires a system after revocation would pay fair market value.
Limits on siting fees and charges
This bill would limit what fees governments can charge to process siting and placement requests. Fees would have to be nondiscriminatory, competitively and technology neutral, publicly posted in advance, and based only on actual, direct costs for review, repairs, or replacement. Fees would be described as one-time or recurring and would not count as franchise fees under section 622. The Assistant Secretary would report to Congress within 180 days on fees charged where grant funds are used.
Free Policy Watch
You just read the policy. Now see what it costs you.
Pick a topic. PRIA runs your household against live legislation and sends you a free personalized readout.
Pick a topic to get started
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Carter (GA)
GA • R
Cosponsors
Crenshaw
TX • R
Sponsored 4/14/2026
Allen
GA • R
Sponsored 4/14/2026
Griffith
VA • R
Sponsored 4/14/2026
Latta
OH • R
Sponsored 4/14/2026
Houchin
IN • R
Sponsored 4/14/2026
Fry
SC • R
Sponsored 4/14/2026
Weber (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 4/14/2026
Goldman (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 4/14/2026
Dunn (FL)
FL • R
Sponsored 4/15/2026
Obernolte
CA • R
Sponsored 4/15/2026
Balderson
OH • R
Sponsored 4/15/2026
Bilirakis
FL • R
Sponsored 4/15/2026
Joyce (PA)
PA • R
Sponsored 4/15/2026
Harshbarger
TN • R
Sponsored 4/15/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govLive Policy Activity
LiveSurfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph — ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
Deep Dive
· Polipedia policy encyclopediaYouth Conservation Corps & Public Lands Corps
The federal government runs two closely related conservation-workforce pipelines on public lands: the Youth Conservation Corps YCC and the Public Lands Corps PLC. YCC is a summer employment program fo
WTO Membership & Uruguay Round Agreements Act
The Uruguay Round Agreements Act URAA of 1994 19 U.S.C. §§ 3501–3624 implemented U.S. membership in the World Trade Organization WTO and incorporated the Uruguay Round trade agreements — the broadest
World Trade Center Health Program (James Zadroga Act)
The World Trade Center Health Program is a federally funded health benefits program that provides free medical monitoring and treatment to those who were exposed to the toxic dust, debris, and fumes f
Workers' Compensation
Workers' compensation is the United States' primary workplace injury system — a no-fault insurance program where employees who are injured on the job receive medical coverage and partial wage replacem
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Take the PRIA Score to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in