Reducing Medically Unnecessary Delays in Care Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Representative Green (TN)
Introduced
Summary
Would require Medicare coverage decisions — including prior authorizations and denials — to follow written clinical criteria developed with physician input. The bill sets rules for how Medicare administrative contractors, Medicare Advantage plans, and prescription drug plans create, post, and use clinical rules that determine medical necessity.
Show full summary
- Medicare beneficiaries: Coverage denials and preauthorization decisions would have to be tied to written clinical criteria and be made by a licensed, board‑certified or board‑eligible physician in the same specialty as the treating provider.
- Health care providers: Plans and contractors would have to post current preauthorization rules online in accessible language and notify contracted providers at least 60 days before new or amended requirements take effect.
- Plans and contractors: New contract terms would require evidence‑based, annually updated clinical criteria developed with input from actively practicing physicians, allow case‑by‑case deviations, and forbid denials based solely on the absence of an independently developed evidence standard when none exists.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Clearer Medicare prior authorization rules
If enacted, Medicare contractors, Medicare Advantage plans, and Medicare drug plans would have new prior authorization rules for contracts that apply starting 90 days after enactment. Plans would have to give doctors at least 60 days’ written notice before new prior authorization rules begin and post easy-to-read rules and clinical criteria on their websites. They would also post approval and denial rates by doctor specialty, drug or test, diagnosis, and reason. Prior authorization and denial decisions would be made by a licensed, board-certified (or eligible) doctor in the same specialty, using evidence-based criteria reviewed each year with input from practicing doctors. If no independent evidence standard exists for a service, a plan could not deny it just for that reason.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Green (TN)
TN • R
Cosponsors
Murphy
NC • R
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Schrier
WA • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Joyce (PA)
PA • R
Sponsored 3/27/2025
McCormick
GA • R
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Harris (MD)
MD • R
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Burchett
TN • R
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Babin
TX • R
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Miller-Meeks
IA • R
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Kennedy (UT)
UT • R
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Harrigan
NC • R
Sponsored 3/31/2025
Van Duyne
TX • R
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Jackson (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Finstad
MN • R
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Dunn (FL)
FL • R
Sponsored 4/3/2025
Evans (CO)
CO • R
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Pfluger
TX • R
Sponsored 6/4/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govTake It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in