HR251119th CongressWALLET

Legal Workforce Act

Sponsored By: Representative Calvert

Introduced

Summary

Mandatory national E‑Verify for all U.S. hiring. This bill would create a permanent, nationwide Employment Eligibility Verification process that employers must use for hiring, recruitment, and referrals, with phased deadlines by employer size and rules for document checks and recordkeeping.

Show full summary
  • Employers: Must use a DHS‑designated attestation form, examine and record approved identity and work‑authorization documents, retain verification records, and follow procedures for tentative and final nonconfirmations; phased deadlines range from 6 months for the largest employers to 24 months for smallest employers (with special rules for agricultural work).
  • Workers and families: Certain previously hired groups (federal, state, and local government employees, some cleared personnel, and some federal contractors) must be verified within 6 months; the bill adds reverification rules, allows parent/guardian attestations for minors, and creates programs to block or suspend misuse of Social Security numbers.
  • Government and oversight: It raises civil penalties (including minimums starting at $2,500 and maximums up to $25,000), authorizes contractor debarment, requires SSA and DHS funding agreements, mandates at least 2 identity‑authentication pilots within 24 months, and orders SSA Inspector General audits within 1 year.

*Would require the federal government to fund the Social Security Administration's full costs for verification operations and provide an interim funding mechanism, creating an ongoing federal spending obligation.*

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

6 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 5 mixed.

Higher fines and new protections for employers

Civil penalties for hiring‑verification violations would rise to tiers of $2,500–$5,000, $5,000–$10,000, and $10,000–$25,000 per violation. Paperwork fines could be $1,000 or $25,000, and criminal penalties could reach up to $5,000 per unauthorized worker and up to 18 months in prison. Not using the system or knowingly feeding it false data would count as violations. A good‑faith defense would protect employers who follow the rules and timelines; using secure ID tech helps. Penalties could be waived or reduced for good faith, small business size must be considered, and repeat violators could be barred from federal contracts under federal rules.

Nationwide work-eligibility checks and funding

The government would set up a national system to check if new hires can work. Employers could call or use free electronic tools and would get a confirmation or a tentative nonconfirmation within 3 working days. The system would keep inquiry codes and build in privacy and anti-discrimination safeguards. DHS and Social Security would compare records to run the checks. The bill would repeal the old confirmation program 30 months after enactment and point all references to the new system. Starting with fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2025, DHS would fund SSA’s costs through an advance-paid agreement that is reconciled each year.

Stronger protections against SSN and document fraud

People could block or limit use of a Social Security number in the work‑check system, especially if it looks misused. Victims could suspend their SSN, and parents could suspend a minor’s SSN; some parts may start as pilots. The SSA Inspector General would audit, within 1 year, reports of SSN misuse, children’s SSNs used for work, and employers with many mismatched wage reports. The bill would also widen a fraud law to cover documents used to prove the right to work.

State enforcement and recruiter rules for hiring

Federal rules would override state and local laws on hiring and work‑status checks. States could enforce the federal scheme only if they adopt federal regulations, use federal penalty levels, and pay their own costs. An employer could not face both federal and state enforcement for the same violation. DHS would set up an office to take state and local complaints, respond within 5 business days, investigate credible cases, and report yearly. The bill would also define “refer” to cover paid recruiters, labor service agencies, and union hiring halls (even if unpaid).

Clearer list of work and ID documents

The bill would spell out which documents prove both identity and the right to work. Examples include an unexpired U.S. passport, a green card with a photo, an employment authorization card with a photo, and certain foreign passports with a current I‑94. Any new documents allowed by DHS would need a photo, biometric data, and strong anti‑tamper features. Most changes would take effect 1 year after enactment (some job‑continuation rules would kick in after 6 months).

Pilot programs to test worker ID

DHS would launch at least two pilot programs using different identity technologies within 24 months of enactment. Employers could join a pilot and leave after one year without penalty. DHS would report its findings and the chosen technologies to Congress within 12 months after the pilots start.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Calvert

CA • R

Cosponsors

  • McClintock

    CA • R

    Sponsored 1/9/2025

  • Case

    HI • D

    Sponsored 2/4/2025

  • Biggs (AZ)

    AZ • R

    Sponsored 2/4/2025

  • Wagner

    MO • R

    Sponsored 2/4/2025

  • Biggs (SC)

    SC • R

    Sponsored 2/6/2025

  • Gill (TX)

    TX • R

    Sponsored 2/27/2025

  • Smith (NJ)

    NJ • R

    Sponsored 3/11/2025

  • Boebert

    CO • R

    Sponsored 5/7/2025

  • Collins

    GA • R

    Sponsored 5/8/2025

  • Smucker

    PA • R

    Sponsored 7/10/2025

  • Nehls

    TX • R

    Sponsored 8/19/2025

  • Fry

    SC • R

    Sponsored 8/19/2025

  • Roy

    TX • R

    Sponsored 8/26/2025

  • Davidson

    OH • R

    Sponsored 8/26/2025

  • Barr

    KY • R

    Sponsored 10/10/2025

  • Hunt

    TX • R

    Sponsored 10/17/2025

  • Cloud

    TX • R

    Sponsored 10/17/2025

  • Fine

    FL • R

    Sponsored 10/24/2025

  • Wied

    WI • R

    Sponsored 11/7/2025

  • Donalds

    FL • R

    Sponsored 11/7/2025

  • Brecheen

    OK • R

    Sponsored 11/19/2025

  • DesJarlais

    TN • R

    Sponsored 11/19/2025

  • Self

    TX • R

    Sponsored 12/9/2025

  • Miller (IL)

    IL • R

    Sponsored 12/9/2025

  • Jack

    GA • R

    Sponsored 12/16/2025

  • Steube

    FL • R

    Sponsored 1/12/2026

  • Moore (WV)

    WV • R

    Sponsored 1/22/2026

  • Cline

    VA • R

    Sponsored 2/2/2026

  • Strong

    AL • R

    Sponsored 2/4/2026

  • McDowell

    NC • R

    Sponsored 2/12/2026

  • Van Epps

    TN • R

    Sponsored 2/23/2026

  • Ogles

    TN • R

    Sponsored 2/23/2026

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov
Back to Legislation

Take It Personal

Get Your Personalized Policy View

Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.

Already have an account? Sign in