HR3269119th Congress

ETHIC Act

Sponsored By: Representative Arrington

Introduced

Summary

This bill would limit patent owners to asserting at most one patent per "Patent Group" against a generic or biosimilar applicant or product holder, aiming to cut through patent "thickets" that delay competition.

Show full summary
  • Generic and biosimilar applicants and holders would face fewer parallel patent suits. The limit applies to applications under section 505(b)(2) or 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and to licensure under section 351(k) of the Public Health Service Act submitted on or after enactment.
  • Patent owners could no longer bring multiple infringement actions over different patents in the same Patent Group against the same party. They would be restricted to one asserted patent per Patent Group for each targeted party.
  • Courts and litigants would use a new "Patent Group" definition based on disclaimers under 35 U.S.C. 253 to determine which patents count together. That groups commonly owned patents or applications that reference one another via disclaimers.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.

Caps patent claims in drug lawsuits

If enacted, in certain drug and biologic patent cases, a plaintiff would be limited to one patent per "Patent Group" against a covered party. A Patent Group would mean commonly owned patents tied together by a formal patent disclaimer. The limit would cover generic or follow-on drug and biosimilar applicants, holders of those approvals, and people making, selling, or importing those products. After one such case, the same plaintiff could not bring another case against that party on a different patent in the same Group. The rule would apply to applications filed on or after the date of enactment.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Arrington

TX • R

Cosponsors

  • Doggett

    TX • D

    Sponsored 5/8/2025

  • Issa

    CA • R

    Sponsored 5/8/2025

  • Jayapal

    WA • D

    Sponsored 5/8/2025

  • Pfluger

    TX • R

    Sponsored 5/8/2025

  • Dingell

    MI • D

    Sponsored 5/9/2025

  • Tlaib

    MI • D

    Sponsored 7/29/2025

  • Harshbarger

    TN • R

    Sponsored 4/6/2026

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov
Back to Legislation

Take It Personal

Get Your Personalized Policy View

Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.

Already have an account? Sign in