All Roll Calls
Yes: 407 • No: 388
Sponsored By: Representative Hudson
Passed House
This bill would create a centralized, FERC-led NEPA review process for Natural Gas Act authorizations to shorten reviews and force clearer coordination among Federal and State agencies. It sets firm timelines, agency roles, and public tracking to cut duplicative work and speed decisions.
Personalized for You
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
4 provisions identified: 4 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
If enacted, applicants for Natural Gas Act permits would not need a Clean Water Act section 401 certification. For projects that would discharge to navigable waters, FERC would name the State or interstate water agency early in the review. That agency could propose water terms, but FERC could add them only if needed to meet key Clean Water Act rules. This could remove one hurdle while keeping core water protections in place.
If enacted, FERC would be the single lead for environmental reviews on Natural Gas Act pipeline and LNG projects. Within 30, 45, and 60 days, it would list, invite, and name the agencies that must take part. Agencies would work in parallel, report progress at least every 90 days, and follow FERC’s schedule; a public timeline would be posted. After FERC finishes its review, other federal authorizations would be due within 90 days unless another federal law sets a different schedule. Agencies not named could not run extra environmental reviews unless legally required and based on new information, and missed deadlines would trigger notice to Congress within 5 days.
If enacted, agencies would have to consider aerial or other remote data you submit with your permit application. They could issue conditional approvals based on that data, with onsite checks later. FERC and other agencies could let you fund third‑party reviewers to help move your application faster.
If enacted, FERC would consult the Transportation Security Administration when it reviews pipeline projects. The check would cover security, cybersecurity, and personnel security using TSA guidance. This would add a focused security review during the permit process.
Free Policy Watch
Pick a topic. PRIA runs your household against live legislation and sends you a free personalized readout.
Pick a topic to get started
Hudson
NC • R
Balderson
OH • R
Sponsored 6/2/2025
Dunn (FL)
FL • R
Sponsored 6/23/2025
Lawler
NY • R
Sponsored 9/10/2025
All Roll Calls
Yes: 407 • No: 388
house vote • 12/12/2025
On Passage
Yes: 213 • No: 184
house vote • 12/12/2025
On Motion to Recommit
Yes: 194 • No: 204
Take It Personal
Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in
HR833 — Educational Choice for Children Act of 2025
Federal tax credits for donations to scholarship organizations would create matching tax incentives for individuals and corporations to fund K–12 scholarships. The bill targets households up to 300% of area median income, sets a $10 billion annual volume cap, and would exclude those scholarship amounts from gross income.
HR1227 — Alternatives to PAIN Act
Lowering cost and access barriers for qualifying non-opioid pain management drugs under Medicare Part D. This bill would make certain non-opioid pain drugs cheaper and easier to get for Medicare enrollees. - Medicare Part D enrollees would pay less out of pocket because qualifying non-opioid pain drugs would not be subject to the Part D deductible and must be placed on the lowest cost-sharing tier when calculating maximum co-insurance or other cost-sharing. These changes apply for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2026. - Low-income Medicare enrollees who receive Part D subsidies would get the same deductible waiver and lowest-tier placement for qualifying drugs when calculating their maximum cost-sharing, for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2026. - Prescription drug plans and Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans would be barred from imposing step therapy or prior authorization for qualifying non-opioid pain drugs, reducing administrative hurdles for patients and providers beginning in 2026. - A qualifying non-opioid pain drug must have an FDA-approved indication for acute or postoperative pain, not act on opioid receptors, lack a therapeutically equivalent U.S. product, and have a monthly wholesale acquisition cost below a specialty-tier cost threshold that the Secretary may set and update.
HR842 — Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act
Would expand Medicare to cover multi-cancer early detection screening tests. It defines eligible tests as certain FDA-cleared or approved genomic blood tests or comparable biological-sample tests and directs the Secretary to use the national coverage determinations process to decide when they are covered.
HR1949 — Unlocking our Domestic LNG Potential Act of 2025
Gives the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) exclusive authority to approve or deny U.S. natural gas imports and exports, including LNG terminals. It also declares those exports and imports consistent with the public interest and preserves the President's authority to restrict trade under existing sanctions laws. - Energy companies and project developers: The bill consolidates the approval pathway for siting, building, expanding, or operating LNG and other natural gas import and export facilities, a change the text frames as increasing flexibility for global LNG trade. - Federal agencies and regulators: Other agencies keep their existing legal responsibilities related to import and export facilities, so agency roles outside authorization remain in place. - Executive branch and sanctions policy: The President retains power to prohibit imports or exports under the Constitution and specific sanctions laws, and the bill references multiple statutes for defining a "state sponsor of terrorism."
HR27 — HALT Fentanyl Act
This bill would broadly designate fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I and create a structural definition for what counts as a fentanyl-related substance. It would also expand criminal penalties tied to those substances and set new, faster rules to let researchers study them under controlled conditions. - Researchers and research institutions: Shorter, clearer research pathways let qualified practitioners begin certain Schedule I studies 30 days after notice and allow applicants without a registration to be registered or get an order to show cause within 45 days. Institutions can use single registrations across related sites and let certain unregistered staff work under a registered researcher after notice to the Attorney General. - Law enforcement and courts: The bill extends existing federal trafficking and import/export penalty provisions to cover fentanyl-related substances and adds a statutory definition for those substances. - Federal regulators and public transparency: The Attorney General must publish a list of covered substances and may issue rules within 6 months, including interim final rules, and must post special-procedure decisions publicly. The Justice Department Inspector General must study the research provisions and report within 1 year.
HR2725 — Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act of 2025
Rewrites and expands the Low‑Income Housing Tax Credit to boost construction and affordability for very low‑income renters. It would rename the program the Affordable Housing Credit and change how states get credits, who counts as low‑income, and how projects qualify and claim credits. - Families and residents: Would change tenant rules so most full‑time students under age 24 do not count as low‑income occupants, allow tenant‑based voucher payments to be excluded from rent calculations in certain projects, and add protections for survivors of domestic violence and for veterans. - Developers and owners: Would raise state allocations and set the minimum allocation at $4,876,000 in 2025, create a bigger credit when at least 20% of units serve extremely low‑income households, treat relocation costs as eligible rehab expenses, and tighten acquisition‑basis and foreclosure timing rules. - States, tribes, and rural areas: Would require housing agencies to apply community revitalization and cost‑reasonableness criteria, add Indian areas and rural areas to difficult development area rules with specific NAHASDA exceptions, and bar prioritizing local official approval or contributions in allocation plans.