Advanced AI Security Readiness Act
Sponsored By: Representative LaHood
Introduced
Summary
This bill would require the NSA's Artificial Intelligence Security Center to build an AI Security Playbook to __protect advanced AI from technology theft__ by nation-state and other highly resourced actors. The Playbook would map vulnerabilities in advanced AI data centers and models and set out ways to detect, prevent, and respond to cyber and insider threats.
Show full summary
- Private-sector AI developers and researchers would get an unclassified playbook of best practices and be engaged through interviews, roundtables, document reviews, and facility visits.
- The NSA would identify model components and development insights whose theft would meaningfully advance adversaries. It would also describe when the government would need substantial involvement and outline a hypothetical secure government build with protections like model-weight safeguards, personnel vetting, access controls, counterintelligence, and emergency plans.
- The Director would report progress to the House and Senate intelligence committees, with an initial summary in 90 days and a final report in 270 days that includes an unclassified version suitable for private-sector sharing and may include a classified annex.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
NSA would create AI security playbook
If enacted, the National Security Agency would create an AI Security Playbook to protect advanced AI from theft and espionage. It would map weaknesses in AI data centers and developers, flag sensitive items like model weights and core methods, and set ways to detect, prevent, and respond to cyber threats. It would explain when security needs would require major U.S. Government involvement and sketch a highly secure government-run build, covering cybersecurity, weight protections, insider-threat vetting and clearances, access controls, counterintelligence, and emergency plans. The Director would review industry documents, interview experts, host roundtables, visit AI facilities, and work with a federally funded research center; these talks would not create a federal advisory committee. Reports would be due within 90 days (progress) and 270 days (final), with a public unclassified version for private-sector use and an optional classified annex; this would not grant new regulatory or enforcement powers.
Free Policy Watch
You just read the policy. Now see what it costs you.
Pick a topic. PRIA runs your household against live legislation and sends you a free personalized readout.
Pick a topic to get started
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
LaHood
IL • R
Cosponsors
Rep. Moolenaar, John R. [R-MI-2]
MI • R
Sponsored 6/11/2025
Rep. Gottheimer, Josh [D-NJ-5]
NJ • D
Sponsored 6/11/2025
Rep. Krishnamoorthi, Raja [D-IL-8]
IL • D
Sponsored 6/11/2025
Rep. Vindman, Eugene Simon [D-VA-7]
VA • D
Sponsored 10/17/2025
Rep. Harder, Josh [D-CA-9]
CA • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govTake It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Take the PRIA Score to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in