All Roll Calls
Yes: 482 • No: 472
Sponsored By: Representative Calvert
Passed House
This Act sets the __FY2026 Department of Defense budget and policy framework__ for personnel, operations, procurement, and research. It funds pay and benefits, tightens domestic sourcing rules, and increases reprogramming and reporting controls.
Personalized for You
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
35 provisions identified: 22 benefits, 8 costs, 5 mixed.
If enacted, $118.0 million would be provided for DoD overseas humanitarian, disaster, and civic aid. The money would be available through September 30, 2027.
If enacted, $800 million would buy helicopters, vehicles, weapons, and more for Guard and Reserve units through September 30, 2028. Chiefs must send modernization priority plans within 30 days, and funds could not buy manned fixed‑wing aircraft or missiles, munitions, or ammunition. Also, when Guard/Reserve members do covered intelligence support, their pay and allowances could be reimbursed from operation and maintenance funds instead of from Guard/Reserve appropriations.
If enacted, DoD could transfer up to $6 billion among appropriations for unforeseen, higher‑priority military needs with OMB approval and prompt notice to Congress. Separately, $194.452598 million of Army operations and maintenance would stay available until spent and could be transferred or used for contracts, with compliance to law as national security allows.
If enacted, DoD would have to allocate FY2026 CHIPS Defense Fund money within 45 days and report quarterly on balances. It would add $321.923 million under the Defense Production Act, with $150 million for biomanufacturing. A DoD credit pilot would get $97.77 million and could back up to $4.39 billion in loans and guarantees. The National Defense Stockpile would receive $90 million through FY2028, including $10 million for titanium, after a 30‑day execution plan.
If enacted, money in this bill could not pay for gender‑affirming surgeries or hormone treatments in DoD‑funded programs. It would also bar EFMP from paying for, referring to, or moving a family to get gender transition care for a minor child. Military members and dependents who rely on DoD funding for this care would lose that funding source.
If enacted, this bill would cut $1 billion and another $3.75 billion from amounts in the Act. The cuts could not come from the National Intelligence Program or Military Intelligence Program. These reductions could lower funding for some DoD programs and contracts.
If enacted, $49 million would be set aside for grants: $24 million to the USO and $25 million to the American Red Cross. The Secretary of Defense would award the grants only if they serve the national interest. These funds support services used by military members and families.
If enacted, each military department could move up to $11 million this year into Fisher House central funds to support lodging for families. It would also provide a $5 million grant to Fisher House Foundation, if the Secretary finds it serves the national interest, to build and furnish more houses.
If enacted, DoD could not cut sexual assault forensic exam access that civilian personnel had on January 20, 2025. Civilian staff who had access on that date would keep it.
If enacted for the current year, DoD could hire and pay foreign national employees with this bill’s funds. Pay raises could not exceed the DoD civilian percentage raise or the host nation’s, whichever is higher. This would not apply to State Department‑set pay or to employees in Turkey.
If enacted, $35.169 million would fund incentive payments under the Indian Financing Act. Prime contractors and any‑tier subcontractors on DoD awards over $500,000 could receive extra pay when they subcontract to qualifying Indian suppliers, including for commercial items.
If enacted, funds could not retire or store C‑40 aircraft, except after a certified Class A mishap, and DoD must report within 90 days on travel support for 2026–2027. Funds could not decommission Army Prepositioned Stocks‑Afloat ships. SOUTHCOM could not be moved from Miami. Three Army museums could not be closed. Money for the E‑7 Wedgetail and UH‑60 Blackhawk must stay on those programs and cannot be used to pause or cancel them. The Navy’s Next Generation Fighter would be pushed to reach initial use sooner, with a status report due in 30 days and then every quarter.
If enacted, the Air Force would get $342.1 million and the Army $235.2 million for environmental cleanup. DoD‑wide cleanup would get $8.9 million. At least $19.9 million would be set aside to mitigate damage on Indian lands from DoD activities. Leaders could move these funds within DoD accounts for the same purposes and time limits.
If enacted, these funds could not be used to send classified or war plans over unsecured networks. DoD activities paid for here would also need to follow the Posse Comitatus Act, which limits military involvement in civilian law enforcement.
If enacted, federal contracts over $1 million could not require workers or contractors to arbitrate Title VII claims or torts tied to sexual assault or harassment. Covered subcontractors would face the same rule. The Defense Secretary could waive this for national security, with notice at least 15 business days before award.
If enacted, $282.83 million would fund Cooperative Threat Reduction work and stay available through September 30, 2028. The money could be provided by contract or grant to carry out authorized CTR programs.
If enacted, extra APFIT funds could be used to buy or develop software, including software‑only tools, plus related RDT&E and operations. The Secretary would brief Congress at least twice a year through September 30, 2028 on award transitions.
If enacted, DoD could not use this bill’s money to repair or maintain military family housing. Families in those homes could face delayed fixes or costs if no other money is available.
If enacted, DoD could not use these funds for programs or training that promote Critical Race Theory or certain ideas about race or sex. Funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion offices would be blocked. This would affect DoD offices, staff, and contractors that run or deliver such training.
If enacted, DoD could not shift civilian jobs to contractors unless a public‑private competition shows the contractor is at least 10% cheaper or $10 million less over the full period, and without winning by skimping on employer health insurance. DoD could not reimburse contractors for merger‑related restructuring bonuses above normal salary. Agencies would be barred from new awards to corporations with certain unpaid federal tax debts, unless they decide suspension or debarment is not needed.
If enacted, this bill would bar using these funds to require COVID-19 vaccines or masks in DoD settings. DoDEA schools could not require COVID-19 shots for students. This would mainly affect service members, civilian staff, and families with children in DoDEA schools.
If enacted, RDT&E funds could not buy end items for operational use except for development, prototyping, or required testing, with certifications, reports, and waivers for national security. DIU fielding funds could support initial gear and related activities, but spending would wait 15 days after a plan goes to Appropriations. CAPE staff paid by this Act would be capped at 75 FTEs, with some analysis roles exempt. No more than 20% of one‑year funds could be obligated in the last two months, with training exceptions. New demo projects over $5 million would face a 15‑day post‑report wait unless waived in the national interest.
If enacted, DoD would have to follow the Buy American Act when spending these funds. DoD could not buy foreign‑made supercomputers unless the Secretary certifies a unique national security need. Ball and roller bearings would need to be domestic, with case‑by‑case waivers. Certain steel plate would need to be melted and rolled in the U.S. or Canada, with waivers and existing contracts respected. The Secretary would also have to consider barring firms convicted of false “Made in America” labels from DoD contracts.
If enacted, DoD would follow the 2012 assisted reproduction policy for seriously or severely injured active‑duty members, but without time limits on embryo freezing and storage. Covered service members could store embryos without a set end date.
If enacted, the Air Force could give excess relocatable housing units at no cost to Indian tribes in NV, ID, ND, SD, MT, OR, MN, and WA. Tribes must request units through Operation Walking Shield and remove them within a reasonable time.
If enacted, the Guard could let people and groups use Distance Learning Project equipment when space is available, with case‑by‑case fees that go back to the program. The Guard Chief could also waive part or all of lease fees for up to one year for certain nonprofits.
If enacted, at least $80 million would fund a Navy pilot to validate at‑sea logistics with platform supply vessels. The Navy would look at chartering at least six PSVs and sign at least two time charters. It would consider U.S.‑built and documented PSVs owned by U.S. citizens, with specific fuel and deck‑space abilities, and brief Congress within 180 days.
If enacted, DoD would post grant awards on a public, searchable website. After any DoD reconciliation law, the Secretary would send detailed allocation documents within 45 days and report quarterly on balances. DARPA research funds would stay available through September 30, 2027, with quarterly project‑level execution reports to Congress.
If enacted, DoD could not transfer certain armor‑penetrating ammunition to nongovernment groups. Limited exceptions would allow certified demilitarization, or manufacture under a DoD contract, or licensed exports.
If enacted, $12 million of Defense‑Wide operations funds would be set aside for the Irregular Warfare Center under the Defense Security Cooperation Agency.
If enacted, military stores could not sell tobacco below the most competitive local price. Overseas stores would price within the U.S. military store price range. Tobacco buyers on base could pay more than before.
If enacted, DoD could not use these funds to carry out the October 20, 2022 memorandum or any similar policy. DoD also could not write or enforce a substantially similar rule using this money.
If enacted, no more than $30 million of Defense‑Wide operations funds could be shifted this year into military pay. Any transferred funds would support personnel working with eligible outside organizations under 10 U.S.C. 2012.
If enacted, these funds could not be used to make, buy, or show any map that shows Taiwan or certain nearby islands as part of the People’s Republic of China. This applies only to maps paid for with this Act’s funds.
If enacted, $61.8 million would go to the Acquisition Workforce Development Account for FY2026. No other amounts could be added to that account in FY2026 under 10 U.S.C. 1705(d).
Calvert
CA • R
There are no cosponsors for this bill.
All Roll Calls
Yes: 482 • No: 472
senate vote • 10/16/2025
On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed H.R. 4016
Yes: 50 • No: 44
house vote • 7/18/2025
On Passage
Yes: 221 • No: 209
house vote • 7/18/2025
On Motion to Recommit
Yes: 211 • No: 219
Take It Personal
Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in
HR4669 — FEMA Act of 2025
FEMA becomes an independent, cabinet-level agency with a clarified all-hazards mission and consolidated federal leadership for preparedness, response, recovery, mitigation, and interoperable communications. The bill also rewrites large parts of the Stafford Act to speed repairs, expand assistance, strengthen mitigation, and publish new public dashboards for disaster spending and individual aid metrics. - Families and disaster survivors: Expands housing help with a FEMA Emergency Home Repair program, authorizes direct repair assistance, and extends some temporary assistance periods from 18 to 24 months. Noncongregate sheltering can be provided without a fixed address and states cannot require a credit card for hoteling. - State, Tribal, and local governments and utilities: Creates expedited Section 409 grants for repairing public and qualifying nonprofit facilities with a Federal share floor of 75% and incentives up to 85% for resilience. Offers small-disaster block grants equal to 80% of the estimated Federal public assistance share and sets a Tribal hazard-mitigation minimum of $75.0 million per year. - Private nonprofits and houses of worship: Treats private nonprofits and houses of worship as eligible for assistance without regard to religious character and expands nonprofit closeout and eligibility parity with governments.
HR5582 — Patients Deserve Price Tags Act
Would require broad price transparency across hospitals, clinical labs, imaging centers, and ambulatory surgical centers by making standard charges and payer‑specific negotiated prices public in machine‑readable and consumer‑friendly formats, while giving group health plans stronger access to claims data and new enforcement tools.
HR2725 — Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act of 2025
Rewrites and expands the Low‑Income Housing Tax Credit to boost construction and affordability for very low‑income renters. It would rename the program the Affordable Housing Credit and change how states get credits, who counts as low‑income, and how projects qualify and claim credits. - Families and residents: Would change tenant rules so most full‑time students under age 24 do not count as low‑income occupants, allow tenant‑based voucher payments to be excluded from rent calculations in certain projects, and add protections for survivors of domestic violence and for veterans. - Developers and owners: Would raise state allocations and set the minimum allocation at $4,876,000 in 2025, create a bigger credit when at least 20% of units serve extremely low‑income households, treat relocation costs as eligible rehab expenses, and tighten acquisition‑basis and foreclosure timing rules. - States, tribes, and rural areas: Would require housing agencies to apply community revitalization and cost‑reasonableness criteria, add Indian areas and rural areas to difficult development area rules with specific NAHASDA exceptions, and bar prioritizing local official approval or contributions in allocation plans.
HR4317 — PBM Reform Act of 2025
Greater PBM transparency and tighter contract rules would require pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to disclose detailed per‑drug revenues and rebates, protect small "essential" retail pharmacies, and change Medicaid and group plan payment rules across the drug supply chain. The bill would layer reporting, audit rights, pass‑through pricing, and enforcement across Medicare Part D, ERISA/group plans, and Medicaid to spotlight hidden payments and affiliate flows. - Patients and community pharmacies: Would create an "essential retail pharmacy" label for pharmacies in underserved areas and require network access standards and biennial public data starting in 2028, helping small pharmacies show reimbursement and cost differences to plans. - PBMs, plans, and auditors: Would force PBMs to adopt flat bona fide service fees, disclose per‑drug claims, rebates, retained revenue, and affiliate dispensing shares, and give sponsors audit rights and remedies for improper remuneration. - States and Medicaid programs: Would require monthly national acquisition‑cost surveys, ban spread pricing in State Medicaid contracts, and mandate pass‑through pricing with itemized reporting and penalties for false data. Would increase federal spending for implementation by about $336 million in FY2025 and fund ongoing oversight including a $9 million annual IG appropriation.
HR471 — Fix Our Forests Act
Speeds hazardous fuels reduction and wildfire resilience by creating designated fireshed areas, a joint Fireshed Center, and new authorities that would streamline planning, data sharing, and on-the-ground restoration across federal, Tribal, state, local, private, and nonprofit lands. - Communities and households: At-risk communities would get coordinated mapping, smoke forecasting, and a unified grant application to make funding for home hardening and local projects easier to access. - Tribal governments and state/local partners: Tribes or Governors could trigger shared‑stewardship agreements within 90 days to join cross‑boundary planning and fireshed assessments that prioritize tribal water supplies and community risk. - Forest managers, utilities, and responders: Agencies would gain faster project authorities including NEPA exemptions for designated firesheds, higher Healthy Forests Restoration Act project thresholds (10,000 acres), a 150‑foot hazard‑tree clearance for power lines, expanded contracting tools, and intra‑agency strike teams to speed environmental reviews and implementation. Note: The sources set many deadlines, reporting rules, pilot programs, and several seven‑year sunsets but do not provide a specific federal cost estimate.
HR6955 — Main Street Capital Access Act
easier formation and tailored rules for small and rural banks. This bill would make it simpler for small, rural, and de novo banks to form and operate by phasing in capital requirements and creating tailored supervisory paths. It would also force faster, more transparent exams and new independent review rights for supervised institutions. - Community and rural banks: Newly insured depository institutions would get a 3-year phase-in of federal capital requirements and a Rural Community Depository Institution leverage ratio for institutions with assets up to $10 billion. Limited-scope exams and changes to the Community Bank Leverage Ratio aim to ease regulatory burden for qualifying community banks. - Examinations and agency transparency: Federal agencies would have strict timetables for exams, including a 270-day completion rule and faster final reports, must publish summaries of determinations, add a clear guidance statement that guidance is not binding, and provide institutions a de novo independent review of material supervisory decisions. - Systemic, merger, and resolution rules: Several enhanced-regulation triggers would rise to $370 billion and be indexed to nominal GDP, mergers that create banks under $10 billion would generally not face competition review, and the FDIC could select constrained non-least-cost resolution options to avoid sales to very large global banks under set conditions.