All Roll Calls
Yes: 426 • No: 429
Sponsored By: Representative Miller-Meeks
Passed House
Creates a new set of employer-run health plan options under ERISA. It would let groups and associations run Association Health Plans and create employer-funded CHOICE reimbursement arrangements while imposing broad pharmacy benefit manager reporting rules to boost drug-price transparency.
Personalized for You
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
4 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 0 costs, 2 mixed.
If enacted, the bill would appropriate 'such sums as may be necessary' to make ACA cost‑sharing reduction (CSR) payments for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2027. That would lower out-of-pocket costs for marketplace enrollees who qualify for CSRs. Appropriated amounts could not be used for CSR payments for any qualified health plan that provides abortion coverage except when coverage is limited to saving the mother's life or for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest.
If enacted, PBMs would have to provide group health plans with detailed, plain-language reports at least every six months, starting for plan years that begin 30 months after enactment. Reports must show per-drug prices, rebates, PBM and pharmacy payments, participant out-of-pocket spending, and utilization. For drugs with over $10,000 in gross spending, reports must include similar drugs and a formulary rationale. Plans must notify participants each year and let them request claims-level details. The Secretary must issue a standard report format and final rules within 18 months.
If enacted, the bill would create a new employer-funded health reimbursement called a CHOICE arrangement. Employers would fund CHOICE accounts and only pay or reimburse medical care when you have individual-market insurance (not just excepted benefits) or Medicare Part A, B, or C. Employers must offer CHOICE to every worker in the same class on the same terms and generally may not offer another group health plan to that class. The plan must verify qualifying coverage, substantiate claims, follow nondiscrimination rules, and set maximum dollar amounts per participant. Any participant's maximum could not exceed 300% of the lowest maximum after allowed age or dependent adjustments.
If enacted, the bill would let groups of employers maintain ERISA-covered association health plans even if members are in different industries. Associations must have been formed in good faith for other purposes, exist at least two years, have a governing board, and offer coverage to at least 51 employees and to all employees of member employers. Self-employed people could join an aggregated group only if it has at least 20 members, and plans must regularly verify self‑employment. The bill also clarifies stop‑loss treatment and adds ERISA preemption where State law would block such stop‑loss arrangements.
Miller-Meeks
IA • R
There are no cosponsors for this bill.
All Roll Calls
Yes: 426 • No: 429
house vote • 12/17/2025
On Passage
Yes: 216 • No: 211
house vote • 12/17/2025
On Motion to Recommit
Yes: 210 • No: 218
Take It Personal
Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in
HR2725 — Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act of 2025
Rewrites and expands the Low‑Income Housing Tax Credit to boost construction and affordability for very low‑income renters. It would rename the program the Affordable Housing Credit and change how states get credits, who counts as low‑income, and how projects qualify and claim credits. - Families and residents: Would change tenant rules so most full‑time students under age 24 do not count as low‑income occupants, allow tenant‑based voucher payments to be excluded from rent calculations in certain projects, and add protections for survivors of domestic violence and for veterans. - Developers and owners: Would raise state allocations and set the minimum allocation at $4,876,000 in 2025, create a bigger credit when at least 20% of units serve extremely low‑income households, treat relocation costs as eligible rehab expenses, and tighten acquisition‑basis and foreclosure timing rules. - States, tribes, and rural areas: Would require housing agencies to apply community revitalization and cost‑reasonableness criteria, add Indian areas and rural areas to difficult development area rules with specific NAHASDA exceptions, and bar prioritizing local official approval or contributions in allocation plans.
HR4317 — PBM Reform Act of 2025
Greater PBM transparency and tighter contract rules would require pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to disclose detailed per‑drug revenues and rebates, protect small "essential" retail pharmacies, and change Medicaid and group plan payment rules across the drug supply chain. The bill would layer reporting, audit rights, pass‑through pricing, and enforcement across Medicare Part D, ERISA/group plans, and Medicaid to spotlight hidden payments and affiliate flows. - Patients and community pharmacies: Would create an "essential retail pharmacy" label for pharmacies in underserved areas and require network access standards and biennial public data starting in 2028, helping small pharmacies show reimbursement and cost differences to plans. - PBMs, plans, and auditors: Would force PBMs to adopt flat bona fide service fees, disclose per‑drug claims, rebates, retained revenue, and affiliate dispensing shares, and give sponsors audit rights and remedies for improper remuneration. - States and Medicaid programs: Would require monthly national acquisition‑cost surveys, ban spread pricing in State Medicaid contracts, and mandate pass‑through pricing with itemized reporting and penalties for false data. Would increase federal spending for implementation by about $336 million in FY2025 and fund ongoing oversight including a $9 million annual IG appropriation.
HR4895 — Afghan Adjustment Act
This bill would create a pathway to conditional and, in some cases, permanent residence for specified Afghan nationals. It would also expand refugee admissions, set up remote processing and referrals for Afghan allies, and add a new family-based special immigrant visa category. - Families and eligible Afghans in the United States would be able to seek adjustment to conditional lawful permanent resident status. Conditions may be removed no earlier than four years after the admission or parole date or by July 1, 2027, and initial status and work-authorizing documents cannot carry a fee. - Afghan allies outside the United States would gain a named referral program and remote refugee processing. The Defense Department and other agencies would use a secure portal for referrals and biometrics, and Afghan allies are designated refugees of special humanitarian concern for at least 10 years. - Relatives of U.S. service members would be eligible for a new family-based SIV category capped at 2,500 principal visas per year with carryover and a 10,000 overall ceiling. The bill authorizes virtual interviews, quarterly program reporting, and a 10-year nationwide waiver of certain DHS and State fees.
HR1656 — PLUS for Veterans Act of 2025
This bill would tighten and standardize how agents, attorneys, and organizations represent veterans on VA claims by capping fees, requiring disclosures, and increasing penalties for improper charging. It also clarifies that giving a medical exam or completing the related report is not the same as preparing a claim for purposes of these rules. - Veterans and claimants would get clearer protections. The bill would cap flat fees for initial claims at the lesser of $12,500 or five times the monthly benefit increase, require a standard fee form, bar fee collection before an initial decision, and confirm the option to pick a private physician for exams. - People who want recognition as agents or attorneys would face a formal application process with mail, fax, or electronic options. The bill would allow conditional recognition if background checks take longer than 90 days, permit one-year temporary recognition and further one-year extensions, and require reporting on suspensions or denials by representative type. - Oversight, money, and penalties would be strengthened. The Secretary could assess applicants who charge fees with assessments up to $500 to fund administration. The bill would reinstate criminal and civil penalties for unauthorized fees, add enhanced penalties during conditional recognition including a $50,000 fine and possible bars from recognition, and deposit fines into a revolving fund. The bill would also preempt any state laws that conflict with these federal rights.
HR3132 — CHOICE for Veterans Act of 2025
Creates regulated accreditation and fee limits for people who help veterans file VA benefits claims. It would set a national recognition system for agents, attorneys, and organizations, standardize fee agreements, and expand claimants' access to no-cost accredited help. - Veterans and families: Veterans would get a public, quarterly-updated list of accredited representatives and an online warning about fees. The VA must point claimants to recognized organizations that offer no-cost claim preparation. - Representatives: Agents and attorneys would need formal recognition and a knowledge test and must meet higher continuing education requirements. The VA could grant temporary recognition and charge an assessment of up to $500 for recognition applications. - Oversight and penalties: The VA would gain audit authority and must report annually to Congress while the Government Accountability Office would review the recognition process. The bill creates civil and criminal-like penalties, requires revocation for violators, and sets a $50,000 penalty for repeat offenses.
HR833 — Educational Choice for Children Act of 2025
Federal tax credits for donations to scholarship organizations would create matching tax incentives for individuals and corporations to fund K–12 scholarships. The bill targets households up to 300% of area median income, sets a $10 billion annual volume cap, and would exclude those scholarship amounts from gross income.