Safe Cloud Storage Act
Sponsored By: Representative Lee (FL)
Introduced
Summary
Creates a limited-liability framework that lets vetted cloud vendors store and manage digital child pornography and child obscenity for law enforcement under strict security and reporting rules. The bill adds a new section to the PROTECT Our Children Act defining approved vendors, covered agencies, and required safeguards.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
New rules for storing child abuse evidence
If enacted, the bill would let federal, state, or local law enforcement or prosecutors hire private cloud or storage companies (called "approved vendors") to store and provide access to digital child pornography and child obscenity for investigations. Approved vendors would have to keep the data in the United States unless the hiring agency expressly consents to an overseas transfer. Vendors would be required to follow the most recent NIST Cybersecurity Framework, use end-to-end encryption or an equivalent standard, limit and record employee access, and undergo an independent annual cybersecurity audit that assesses compliance with NIST SP 800-53, Revision 5 (or a successor). Vendors would need to notify the Justice Department's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section within 30 days of signing a contract and must notify DOJ CJIS (for federal breaches) or the appropriate state attorney general (for state/local breaches) within 30 days if a contracting agency fails to pay, materially breaches, or terminates a contract without lawful transfer; vendors must preserve evidence until it is lawfully transferred. The bill would generally shield approved vendors from civil or criminal claims for performing these contracted duties, but it would still allow claims for intentional misconduct, negligence, actual malice, reckless disregard of substantial risk, or acts outside the contracted responsibilities. The bill would also make clear it does not limit a contracting agency's bona fide use of evidence or its obligations under court orders or statutes, including 18 U.S.C. 3509(m)(3).
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Lee (FL)
FL • R
Cosponsors
Dean (PA)
PA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Cohen
TN • D
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Knott
NC • R
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govTake It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in