Stop Unemployment Fraud Act
Sponsored By: Representative Smucker
Introduced
Summary
Stronger identity verification is the center of this bill. It would create a federal framework to curb unemployment insurance fraud by requiring tougher ID checks, national data-matching, stricter work-search rules, and changes to when payments are made.
Show full summary
- Claimants and jobseekers would have to provide at least one valid federal or state government ID plus supporting documents to apply. They must register for employment services and submit a verified work-search record each week. Self-attestation alone would not prove weekly eligibility.
- States would certify or build an Integrity Data Hub to cross-match claims with the National Directory of New Hires, the State Information Data Exchange System, and Social Security data on incarcerated and deceased individuals to detect fraud. The Secretary of Labor could monitor compliance and withhold 5 percent of certain funds for noncompliance.
- States could keep up to 5 percent of recovered overpayments and related collections to fund administration, fraud deterrence, worker classification efforts, and technology modernization. Most major provisions would phase in two years after enactment.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
6 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 0 costs, 6 mixed.
Cross-checks to spot UI fraud
If enacted, States would have to use an Integrity Data Hub or similar system to cross-match unemployment claims with national and state records. They would check new-hire files, employer responses, incarceration and death records, and Social Security lists to verify employment or ineligibility and to recover improper payments. This would help catch and recover wrong payments but could lead to more denials or recoupments for some claimants.
Payments only after eligibility confirmed
If enacted, States would have to pay weekly UI only after a claimant is found eligible, files a weekly claim, and meets weekly rules. The Labor Secretary would set maximum timeframes for payment within 180 days, including for high-volume periods. Claimant self-attestation alone would not be enough to prove weekly eligibility starting two years after enactment. These steps aim to reduce "pay-and-chase" overpayments but could delay payments for some people.
Stricter ID checks for jobless claims
If enacted, States would have to verify identity for initial unemployment claims filed two years after enactment. Verification would need at least one current federal or state photo ID plus one supporting document like a utility bill, lease, or vehicle registration. The Labor Secretary would write rules within 12 months on costs, privacy, bias safeguards, and due process. These checks could reduce fraud but might delay benefits for people without required documents.
Weekly work-search proof required
If enacted, regular unemployment claimants would have to register for state job services, keep a weekly work-search record listing employers contacted, how you contacted them, and the date, and provide that record each week they get benefits. States must verify those records. The Labor Secretary would issue guidance within six months. This seeks to improve program integrity but adds paperwork and a risk of lost benefits for noncompliance.
Federal monitoring and fund withholding
If enacted, the Labor Secretary would monitor State compliance with identity-verification and work-search rules. After notice and a hearing, the Secretary could withhold 5 percent of certain federal UI administrative funds from a noncompliant State and require a corrective action plan. This is intended to push States to comply but could temporarily reduce State UI administration funding.
States can keep 5% of recoveries
If enacted, States could deposit up to 5 percent of certain recovered overpayments and of contributions collected from investigations into a State fund for fraud prevention, worker classification work, IT upgrades, and related administration. The authority applies to collections after the two-year phase-in and excludes overpayments caused by agency error. States could reinvest a small share of recoveries, but slightly less money would flow immediately to the national Unemployment Trust Fund.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Smucker
PA • R
Cosponsors
Smith (NE)
NE • R
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Buchanan
FL • R
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Fong
CA • R
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Van Duyne
TX • R
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Feenstra
IA • R
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Miller (OH)
OH • R
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Tenney
NY • R
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Kelly (PA)
PA • R
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Arrington
TX • R
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Moore (UT)
UT • R
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Moran
TX • R
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Miller (WV)
WV • R
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Bean (FL)
FL • R
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Yakym
IN • R
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Estes
KS • R
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govTake It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in