Impeaching Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General of the United States of America, for high crimes and misdemeanors.
Sponsored By: Representative Rep. Thanedar, Shri [D-MI-13]
Introduced
Summary
Impeachment of Attorney General Pamela Jo Bondi would charge her with high crimes and misdemeanors for alleged obstruction of Congress, dereliction of duty, and politicizing the Department of Justice.
Show full summary
- Epstein survivors: The resolution says Bondi failed to make unclassified Epstein-related records fully available. It notes about 6 million pages were identified but only about 3.5 million released and at least 40 unredacted nude photos of victims and contact details were disclosed.
- DOJ prosecutors and staff: It alleges Bondi established a Weaponization Working Group and ordered removals of federal prosecutors, including firings tied to January 6 cases, which the resolution frames as undermining prosecutorial independence.
- Public officials and investigations: The articles describe dropped or opened probes involving figures like New York Mayor Eric Adams, Letitia James, James Comey, Jerome Powell, and Tom Homan, arguing those moves show selective or political enforcement.
- Ethics and conflicts: The resolution points to a May 2025 legal opinion tied to transferring a $400 million Qatari jet for Donald Trump and to actions that allegedly favored clients of Bondi's brother, saying she failed to recuse.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
6 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 6 costs, 0 mixed.
Epstein records and victim privacy
The resolution would allege that Public Law 119-38 required unclassified Jeffrey Epstein records to be released in searchable form within 30 days. It would say DOJ identified about 6 million pages but had released only about 3.5 million as of Feb. 13, 2026. The resolution would also allege a Jan. 30, 2026 release included at least 40 unredacted nude photos of victims (including some minors) and that a bipartisan House Oversight subpoena from Aug. 5, 2025 was defied.
Alleged $400 million jet transfer
The resolution would allege that in May 2025 the Attorney General signed a legal opinion authorizing transfer of a Qatari jet valued at about $400 million intended for a private individual. It would say retrofit funds were proposed to come from the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile program and that Congress had not authorized acceptance of the gift or transfer of those funds as of Feb. 13, 2026. The allegation raises Foreign Emoluments and appropriation concerns for taxpayers.
Politicized DOJ enforcement actions
The resolution would allege the Attorney General created and used DOJ units to target political opponents and institutions. It would cite a Feb. 5, 2025 Weaponization Working Group review and a May 19, 2025 Civil Rights Fraud Initiative aimed at university DEIA programs. The resolution would also allege removals of prosecutors tied to Jan. 6 cases and attempts in Feb. 2026 to indict sitting lawmakers, plus false sworn testimony to Congress on Feb. 11, 2026.
Pressure over Minnesota Medicaid and SNAP
The resolution would allege that on Jan. 23, 2026 the Attorney General demanded Minnesota provide Medicaid and SNAP records and repeal sanctuary policies. It would say the letter asked for DOJ access to voter records and linked compliance to changes in Operation Metro Surge deployments. The allegation would describe pressure on a State tied to federal enforcement actions that affect benefit recipients.
Alleged direction to ignore court injunctions
The resolution would allege that in 2025 senior DOJ leaders advised Homeland Security to violate federal-court injunctions on deportation flights to El Salvador. It would also allege staff were told to misrepresent facts in court and to limit interagency email because of FOIA concerns. Those actions would affect immigration cases and the integrity of legal processes.
Conflicts, dropped charges, and favoritism
The resolution would allege the Attorney General took actions that benefited associates and family clients. It would say DOJ moved to drop corruption charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams on Feb. 10, 2025 and that several prosecutors resigned. The resolution would also allege DOJ dismissals in 2025 helped clients of the AG's brother and that a Sept. 20, 2025 probe into Tom Homan was closed despite a recorded $50,000 payment.
Free Policy Watch
You just read the policy. Now see what it costs you.
Pick a topic. PRIA runs your household against live legislation and sends you a free personalized readout.
Pick a topic to get started
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Rep. Thanedar, Shri [D-MI-13]
MI • D
Cosponsors
There are no cosponsors for this bill.
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govTake It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Take the PRIA Score to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in