S1814119th Congress

Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act of 2025

Sponsored By: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse

Introduced

Summary

Creates a mandatory, public code of conduct for the Supreme Court and federal judges. The bill would add clear disclosure, recusal, complaint, and amicus disclosure rules to increase transparency and oversight across the federal judiciary.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

5 provisions identified: 5 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.

Broader rules for judge disqualification

If enacted, the bill would expand disqualification rules and duties. If enacted, judges would have to check and disclose personal and fiduciary financial interests of themselves, spouses, and minor children in the household. If enacted, judges must disqualify when they know a party or affiliate lobbied for them or spent substantial funds on their nomination, or when the judge or close family or closely owned private entities got income, gifts, or reimbursements in the prior six years. If enacted, judges must notify all parties right away if they learn of a reason to disqualify.

New public ethics codes for judges

If enacted, the bill would require the Supreme Court and Judicial Conference to issue mandatory codes of conduct within 180 days. If enacted, the Counselor to the Chief Justice would set rules on acceptance and disclosure of gifts, income, and reimbursements that at minimum match Senate and House rules. If enacted, the Supreme Court would post these codes and related rules on its website in full text, searchable and downloadable form.

Stricter disclosure for amici and parties

If enacted, amicus briefs would have to list anyone who helped prepare the brief and larger funders who gave at least 3% of the amicus's gross revenue or more than $100,000 in the prior year. If enacted, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts would run an annual audit for amicus disclosure compliance. If enacted, within one year the Supreme Court must make rules requiring parties and amici to disclose gifts, income, reimbursements, and any lobbying or substantial funding related to a justice from two years before the case through final disposition.

Sworn complaints and judge investigations

If enacted, the bill would create sworn complaint procedures for Supreme Court justices with signature, contact, facts, and a perjury affirmation. If enacted, complaints would go to a five-judge Judicial Investigation Panel of circuit chief judges that could hold hearings, take sworn testimony, and issue subpoenas. If enacted, it would add a three-judge random reviewing panel process for certified disqualification motions, require stays until final decisions, and require court clerks to post notices and explanations online. If enacted, the Supreme Court must send proposed rules about striking amicus briefs that cause disqualification to Congress within 180 days.

Regular studies and audits of recusal

If enacted, the Federal Judicial Center would study compliance with recusal rules within 180 days and then every two years. If enacted, the Center must keep records when judges are not assigned or later disqualify and send reports to Congress by April 1 after each study. If enacted, the Comptroller General would review the FJC study and the amicus audit within one year and then every five years if the Judiciary Committees request it.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Sheldon Whitehouse

RI • D

Cosponsors

  • Richard Blumenthal

    CT • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Tammy Baldwin

    WI • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Cory Booker

    NJ • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Christopher Coons

    DE • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Richard Durbin

    IL • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • John Fetterman

    PA • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Ruben Gallego

    AZ • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Kirsten Gillibrand

    NY • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Martin Heinrich

    NM • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • John Hickenlooper

    CO • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Mazie Hirono

    HI • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Timothy Kaine

    VA • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Mark Kelly

    AZ • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Amy Klobuchar

    MN • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Edward Markey

    MA • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Jeff Merkley

    OR • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Patty Murray

    WA • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Alex Padilla

    CA • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • John Reed

    RI • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Bernie Sanders

    VT • I

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Brian Schatz

    HI • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Adam Schiff

    CA • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Tina Smith

    MN • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Chris Van Hollen

    MD • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Peter Welch

    VT • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Ron Wyden

    OR • D

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Jacky Rosen

    NV • D

    Sponsored 12/10/2025

  • Jeanne Shaheen

    NH • D

    Sponsored 3/18/2026

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov
Back to Legislation

Take It Personal

Get Your Personalized Policy View

Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.

Already have an account? Sign in