Food Date Labeling Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Senator Richard Blumenthal
Introduced
Summary
Standardized date-label phrases would create a single set of terms for when packaged foods start losing quality and when they should be discarded. The bill would also build a federal framework so the Agriculture and Health and Human Services leaders coordinate rules and outreach.
Show full summary
- Families and shoppers would get clearer, consistent terms on packaging and federal consumer education explaining the difference between quality and discard dates within two years.
- Food labelers and producers could choose whether to print quality or discard dates but would need to use the uniform phrases if they do; misbranding rules would cover poultry, meat, and egg products and final regulations are to be issued within two years.
- States and localities could not impose different or extra date-label requirements and could not bar the sale or donation of food solely because of a discard date.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
5 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 0 costs, 3 mixed.
Stronger enforcement for bad date labels
If enacted, FDA and USDA could treat date labels that do not follow the rules as misbranded. That would let officials require fixes or remove noncompliant products from the market. The change would apply to foods and to meat, poultry, and egg products labeled two years after enactment.
Federal rules and consumer outreach
If enacted, USDA and HHS would write joint final rules and consumer education on date labels within two years. Those rules would apply only to products labeled two years after enactment. The bill would also state that HHS could not use this law to force new quality or discard date labels beyond the Act's labeling subsections.
States barred from different date rules
If enacted, states and local governments could not require different or extra quality or discard date phrases covered by this law. States could not ban sale or donation because of a quality date. States could still ban sale or donation based on a discard date. States could set date-label rules only if those rules use the federal uniform phrases.
Uniform food date label rules
If enacted, labelers who put dates on packaged food would have to use set phrases and a clear format. Dates would show month and year or month, day, and year, in an easy-to-read place. Small packages could use "BB" or "UB" instead of the full phrase. Labelers could add "or freeze by" and could use QR codes, smart labels, or time-temperature indicators.
Private legal claims kept intact
If enacted, the bill would not stop state or federal common-law claims or FTC remedies about date labels. People and businesses could still sue over misleading or harmful labels even where federal label rules apply.
Free Policy Watch
You just read the policy. Now see what it costs you.
Pick a topic. PRIA runs your household against live legislation and sends you a free personalized readout.
Pick a topic to get started
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Richard Blumenthal
CT • D
Cosponsors
Sen. Scott, Rick [R-FL]
FL • R
Sponsored 7/30/2025
Andy Kim
NJ • D
Sponsored 11/7/2025
Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE]
DE • D
Sponsored 3/9/2026
Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]
MA • D
Sponsored 3/9/2026
Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR]
OR • D
Sponsored 3/9/2026
Sen. Alsobrooks, Angela D. [D-MD]
MD • D
Sponsored 3/19/2026
Sen. Schiff, Adam B. [D-CA]
CA • D
Sponsored 3/17/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govTake It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Take the PRIA Score to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in