Ending Chinese Lawfare Act
Sponsored By: Senator Eric Schmitt
Introduced
Summary
This bill would block recognition and enforcement of politically retaliatory court judgments issued by the People’s Republic of China. It aims to protect Americans, U.S. businesses, and U.S. government actions from foreign judgments motivated by political retaliation or punishment for lawful conduct.
Show full summary
- Individuals and U.S.-based businesses named in PRC proceedings would be able to sue in U.S. district court for declaratory or injunctive relief and can show injury by legal costs, reputational harm, chilling of speech, loss of property, or a substantial risk of enforcement.
- U.S. courts would be barred from recognizing a PRC judgment when the proceeding was initiated, directed, controlled, or materially supported by the Chinese Communist Party or the PRC government and substantially motivated by retaliation. Courts would apply a totality-of-the-circumstances test that can include lack of judicial independence, plaintiff identity, public statements, claim nature, and due process problems.
- A party that successfully opposes enforcement of a barred PRC judgment would be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs, and expert expenses.
- The Department of Justice could intervene as of right and its statement of interest would receive substantial weight. The bill also forbids recognition that would penalize or chill First Amendment speech or interfere with lawful U.S. sovereign actions.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Stop enforcement of political PRC judgments
If enacted, U.S. courts would be barred from recognizing or enforcing Chinese court judgments found to be politically retaliatory. A U.S. court would decide this when the Chinese Communist Party or the PRC government initiated, directed, controlled, or materially supported the proceeding and the proceeding was substantially motivated by retaliation for protected speech, lawful government acts, or U.S. rights. Courts would consider the totality of circumstances, including lack of judicial independence, plaintiff affiliation, official statements, the nature of the claims, and absence of due process. The Justice Department would be able to intervene as of right and courts would give substantial weight to its statement of interest. People, States, and government entities exposed to such proceedings would be able to sue in federal court for declaratory and injunctive relief. A prevailing party opposing enforcement would be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, costs, and expert fees. Federal district courts would have original jurisdiction, and state-court filings would be removable to federal court by any party. The bill would also say it does not require U.S. courts to enforce any foreign judgment and would include a severability rule.
Free Policy Watch
You just read the policy. Now see what it costs you.
Pick a topic. PRIA runs your household against live legislation and sends you a free personalized readout.
Pick a topic to get started
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Eric Schmitt
MO • R
Cosponsors
There are no cosponsors for this bill.
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govTake It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Take the PRIA Score to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in