Title 15Commerce and TradeRelease 119-73

§1067 Interference, opposition, and proceedings for concurrent use registration or for cancellation; notice; Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Title 15 › Chapter CHAPTER 22— - TRADEMARKS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— - THE PRINCIPAL REGISTER › § 1067

Last updated Apr 6, 2026|Official source

Summary

When people dispute who can register or keep a trademark, the Director must tell all parties and send the case to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to decide who has registration rights. The Board includes the Director, the patent and trademark commissioners, and administrative trademark judges picked by the Secretary of Commerce after talking with the Director. The Secretary may treat judges appointed by the Director before August 12, 2008 as if their appointment took effect on the Director’s original date. A judge can defend against a challenge to their appointment by saying they acted as a de facto officer (that is, they acted in the job as if properly appointed).

Full Legal Text

Title 15, §1067

Commerce and Trade — Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)In every case of interference, opposition to registration, application to register as a lawful concurrent user, or application to cancel the registration of a mark, the Director shall give notice to all parties and shall direct a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to determine and decide the respective rights of registration.
(b)The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board shall include the Director, Deputy 11 So in original. Probably should be preceded by “the”. Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office 22 So in original. Probably should be followed by a comma. the Commissioner for Patents, the Commissioner for Trademarks, and administrative trademark judges who are appointed by the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Director.
(c)The Secretary of Commerce may, in his or her discretion, deem the appointment of an administrative trademark judge who, before August 12, 2008, held office pursuant to an appointment by the Director to take effect on the date on which the Director initially appointed the administrative trademark judge.
(d)It shall be a defense to a challenge to the appointment of an administrative trademark judge on the basis of the judge’s having been originally appointed by the Director that the administrative trademark judge so appointed was acting as a de facto officer.

Legislative History

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

Prior Provisions

Act Feb. 20, 1905, ch. 592, § 7, 33 Stat. 726.

Amendments

2008—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 110–313, § 1(b)(1), inserted “Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office” after “Director,” and substituted “appointed by the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Director” for “appointed by the Director”. Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 110–313, § 1(b)(2), added subsecs. (c) and (d). 2002—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–273, which directed amendment of subsec. (b) by inserting “the Deputy Commissioner,” after “Commissioner,”, could not be executed because “Commissioner,” does not appear in text. 1999—Pub. L. 106–113 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: “In every case of interference, opposition to registration, application to register as a lawful concurrent user, or application to cancel the registration of a mark, the Commissioner shall give notice to all parties and shall direct a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to determine and decide the respective rights of registration. “The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board shall include the Commissioner, the Deputy Commissioner, the Assistant Commissioners, and members appointed by the Commissioner. Employees of the Patent and Trademark Office and other persons, all of whom shall be competent in trademark law, shall be eligible for appointment as members. Each case shall be heard by at least three members of the Board, the members hearing such case to be designated by the Commissioner.” 1980—Pub. L. 96–455 inserted provisions requiring that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board include the Deputy Commissioner and members appointed by the Commissioner and provisions that employees of the Patent and Trademark Office and other persons, all of whom shall be competent in trademark law, shall be eligible for appointment as members; and struck out provision that the Board include Patent and Trademark Office employees, designated by the Commissioner and whose qualifications have been approved by the Civil Service Commission as being adequate for appointment to the position of examiner in charge of interferences. 1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted “Patent and Trademark Office” for “Patent Office”. 1958—Pub. L. 85–609 substituted “a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board” for “the examiner in charge of interferences” in first paragraph, and inserted second paragraph relating to the composition of the Board.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date

of 1999 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of Title 35, Patents.

Effective Date

of 1980 Amendment; Board Membership as of
October 15, 1980, Unaffected Pub. L. 96–455, § 2, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2024, provided that: “This amendment [amending this section] shall become effective on the date of its enactment [Oct. 15, 1980]. Members of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board on the date of enactment shall continue to be members under and in accordance with the provisions of section 17 of the Act of
July 5, 1946, as amended [this section], in effect immediately preceding the date of enactment.”

Effective Date

of 1975 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of this title.

Effective Date

of 1958 Amendment Pub. L. 85–609, § 3, Aug. 8, 1958, 72 Stat. 541, provided that: “This Act [amending this section and section 1070, 1071, 1092, and 1113 of this title] shall take effect on approval [Aug. 8, 1958]; it shall apply to ex parte appeals taken to the Commissioner prior to the date of approval which have not been heard but shall not apply to any such appeal which has been heard or decided in which event further proceedings may be had as though this Act had not been passed; it shall apply to inter partes cases instituted prior to the date of approval which have not been heard by an examiner of interferences, but shall not apply to any such case which has been heard or decided by an examiner of interferences in which event further proceedings may be had as though this Act had not passed.” Repeal and Effect on Existing RightsRepeal of inconsistent provisions, effect of this chapter on pending proceedings and existing registrations and rights under prior acts, see notes set out under section 1051 of this title. Reorganization Plan No. 5 of 1950 Pub. L. 85–609, § 2, Aug. 8, 1958, 72 Stat. 540, provided that: “The provisions of this Act [amending this section and section 1070, 1071, 1092, and 1113 of this title] shall be subject to Reorganization Plan No. 5 of 1950 (64 Stat. 1263).”

Executive Documents

Transfer of Functions

For

Transfer of Functions

of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of Commerce, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Commerce, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 5 of 1950, §§ 1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Reference

Citations & Metadata

Citation

15 U.S.C. § 1067

Title 15Commerce and Trade

Last Updated

Apr 6, 2026

Release point: 119-73