Title 15Commerce and TradeRelease 119-73

§3058 Review of final decisions of the Authority

Title 15 › Chapter CHAPTER 57A— - HORSERACING INTEGRITY AND SAFETY › § 3058

Last updated Apr 6, 2026|Official source

Summary

When the Authority imposes a final civil penalty on a covered person, the Authority must quickly tell the Commission in the form the Commission requires. Within 30 days after that notice, the Commission or a person harmed by the penalty can ask for a new review by an administrative law judge. The judge will hold a hearing under rules the Commission sets and must decide within 60 days after the hearing ends. The judge will decide if the person did what the Authority said, if those actions broke the law or the Commission’s approved rules, and if the penalty was fair and legal. The judge can keep, change, cancel, or send the case back for more work, and will write findings based on the record. The judge’s decision becomes the Commission’s decision unless someone asks for further review. The Commission can also choose on its own to review the judge’s decision if it gives written notice within 30 days. The Authority or a harmed person can petition the Commission for review within 30 days; if the Commission refuses, the judge’s decision stands. If the Commission reviews, it will re-examine the facts and law and may affirm, change, cancel, or remand the decision. The Commission may allow new evidence if a party shows it is important and there was good reason it wasn’t submitted earlier. A judge’s or Commission review does not pause the penalty unless the judge or the Commission orders a stay.

Full Legal Text

Title 15, §3058

Commerce and Trade — Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)If the Authority imposes a final civil sanction for a violation committed by a covered person pursuant to the rules or standards of the Authority, the Authority shall promptly submit to the Commission notice of the civil sanction in such form as the Commission may require.
(b)(1)With respect to a final civil sanction imposed by the Authority, on application by the Commission or a person aggrieved by the civil sanction filed not later than 30 days after the date on which notice under subsection (a) is submitted, the civil sanction shall be subject to de novo review by an administrative law judge.
(2)(A)In matters reviewed under this subsection, the administrative law judge shall determine whether—
(i)a person has engaged in such acts or practices, or has omitted such acts or practices, as the Authority has found the person to have engaged in or omitted;
(ii)such acts, practices, or omissions are in violation of this chapter or the anti-doping and medication control or racetrack safety rules approved by the Commission; or
(iii)the final civil sanction of the Authority was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.
(B)An administrative law judge shall conduct a hearing under this subsection in such a manner as the Commission may specify by rule, which shall conform to section 556 of title 5.
(3)(A)With respect to a matter reviewed under this subsection, an administrative law judge—
(i)shall render a decision not later than 60 days after the conclusion of the hearing;
(ii)may affirm, reverse, modify, set aside, or remand for further proceedings, in whole or in part, the final civil sanction of the Authority; and
(iii)may make any finding or conclusion that, in the judgment of the administrative law judge, is proper and based on the record.
(B)A decision under this paragraph shall constitute the decision of the Commission without further proceedings unless a notice or an application for review is timely filed under subsection (c).
(c)(1)The Commission may, on its own motion, review any decision of an administrative law judge issued under subsection (b)(3) by providing written notice to the Authority and any interested party not later than 30 days after the date on which the administrative law judge issues the decision.
(2)(A)The Authority or a person aggrieved by a decision issued under subsection (b)(3) may petition the Commission for review of such decision by filing an application for review not later than 30 days after the date on which the administrative law judge issues the decision.
(B)If an application for review under subparagraph (A) is denied, the decision of the administrative law judge shall constitute the decision of the Commission without further proceedings.
(C)(i)A decision with respect to whether to grant an application for review under subparagraph (A) is subject to the discretion of the Commission.
(ii)In determining whether to grant such an application for review, the Commission shall consider whether the application makes a reasonable showing that—
(I)a prejudicial error was committed in the conduct of the proceeding; or
(II)the decision involved—
(aa)an erroneous application of the anti-doping and medication control or racetrack safety rules approved by the Commission; or
(bb)an exercise of discretion or a decision of law or policy that warrants review by the Commission.
(3)(A)In matters reviewed under this subsection, the Commission may—
(i)affirm, reverse, modify, set aside, or remand for further proceedings, in whole or in part, the decision of the administrative law judge; and
(ii)make any finding or conclusion that, in the judgement of the Commission, is proper and based on the record.
(B)The Commission shall review de novo the factual findings and conclusions of law made by the administrative law judge.
(C)(i)The Commission may, on its own motion, allow the consideration of additional evidence.
(ii)(I)A party may file a motion to consider additional evidence at any time before the issuance of a decision by the Commission, which shall show, with particularity, that—
(aa)such additional evidence is material; and
(bb)there were reasonable grounds for failure to submit the evidence previously.
(II)The Commission may—
(aa)accept or hear additional evidence; or
(bb)remand the proceeding to the administrative law judge for the consideration of additional evidence.
(d)Review by an administrative law judge or the Commission under this section shall not operate as a stay of a final civil sanction of the Authority unless the administrative law judge or Commission orders such a stay.

Legislative History

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b)(2)(A)(ii), was in the original “this Act” and was translated as reading “this title”, meaning title XII of div. FF of Pub. L. 116–260, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Reference

Citations & Metadata

Citation

15 U.S.C. § 3058

Title 15Commerce and Trade

Last Updated

Apr 6, 2026

Release point: 119-73