Title 2 › Chapter CHAPTER 20— - EMERGENCY POWERS TO ELIMINATE BUDGET DEFICITS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— - OPERATION AND REVIEW › § 922
Members of Congress and people who are hurt by actions under section 904 can go to the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. to ask a judge to say an order is unconstitutional or does not follow the law and to block or change it. A copy of the complaint must be sent quickly to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House, and either House can join the lawsuit. A three-judge panel must hear these cases, and any decision can be appealed straight to the Supreme Court. The notice of appeal must be filed within 10 days, and the written statement explaining why the Supreme Court can hear the case must be filed within 30 days. A single Justice cannot put a temporary hold on these orders. The district court and the Supreme Court must move these cases as fast as they can. A court can finally decide whether a President’s order under section 904 did or did not make the required cuts to automatic spending increases or did or did not withhold (sequester) the required amounts, or whether it changed those amounts too much. No court order that allows spending money that was held back, or otherwise gives relief from the President’s order, takes effect while the case is under way, during the time for appeal, or until the appeal court issues its final decision. These rights are additional to other legal rights, but they follow the rule above. The economic data and assumptions the OMB Director used in reports under section 904 cannot be reviewed in court or in administrative proceedings.
Full Legal Text
The Congress — Source: USLM XML via OLRC
Legislative History
Reference
Citation
2 U.S.C. § 922
Title 2 — The Congress
Last Updated
Apr 6, 2026
Release point: 119-73