Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 549, 553 and 555 (R.S. § 828; June 28, 1902, ch. 1301, § 1, 32 Stat. 476; Feb. 11, 1925, ch. 204, §§ 2, 6, 8, 43 Stat. 857, 858; Jan. 22, 1927, ch. 50, § 2, 44 Stat. 1023; Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, § 1, 45 Stat. 54; Mar. 3, 1942, ch. 124, § 2, 56 Stat. 122; Sept. 27, 1944, ch. 414, §§ 1, 4, 5, 58 Stat. 743, 744). Section consolidates
section 549, 553, and 555 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., as amended with necessary changes of phraseology. The phrase “filing fee” was substituted for the inconsistent and misleading words of
section 549 and
553 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., “as full payment for all services to be rendered by the clerk” etc. thus removing the necessity for including exceptions and referring to other sections containing provisions for additional fees. The provision in
section 549 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., for payment of fees by the parties instituting criminal proceedings by indictment or information, was omitted. Such proceedings are instituted only by the United States from which costs cannot be exacted. The provision in
section 549 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., for taxation of fees as costs, was omitted as covered by
section 1920 of this title. Words “or appeal from a deportation order of a United States Commissioner” in
section 553 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were omitted as obsolete since repeal of the Chinese Exclusion Act by act Dec. 17, 1943, ch. 344, § 1, 57 Stat. 600. Appeal was formerly conferred by
section 282 of title 8, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Aliens and Nationality. Subsection (d) excepting the District of Columbia, was added to preserve the existing schedule of fees prescribed by
section 11–1509 of the District of Columbia Code, 1940 ed.
Codification Pub. L. 99–591 is a corrected version of Pub. L. 99–500.
2006—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–171 substituted “$350” for “$250”. 2004—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–447 substituted “$250” for “$150”. 1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–317 substituted “$150” for “$120”. 1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–500 and Pub. L. 99–591 substituted “$120” for “$60”. Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 99–336 struck out subsec. (d) which provided that section was not applicable to District of Columbia. 1978—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95–598 substituted “$60” for “$15”.
of 2006 Amendment Pub. L. 109–171, title X, § 10001(d), Feb. 8, 2006, 120 Stat. 184, provided that: “This section [amending this section and enacting provisions set out as notes under
section 1913 and
1931 of this title] and the amendment made by this section shall take effect 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Feb. 8, 2006].”
of 2004 Amendment Pub. L. 108–447, div. B, title III, § 307(c), Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 2895, provided that: “This section [amending this section and
section 1931 of this title] shall take effect 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 8, 2004].”
of 1996 Amendment Pub. L. 104–317, title IV, § 401(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3854, provided that: “This section [amending this section and
section 1931 of this title] shall take effect 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 19, 1996].”
of 1986 Amendment Pub. L. 99–336, § 4(c), June 19, 1986, 100 Stat. 638, provided that: “The
made by this section [amending this section] shall apply with respect to any civil action, suit, or proceeding instituted on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [June 19, 1986].”
of 1978 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 95–598 effective Oct. 1, 1979, see
section 402(c) of Pub. L. 95–598, set out as an
note preceding
section 101 of Title 11, Bankruptcy. Court Fees for Electronic Access to InformationJudicial Conference to prescribe reasonable fees for collection by courts under this section for access to information available through automatic data processing equipment and fees to be deposited in Judiciary Automation Fund, see
section 303 of Pub. L. 102–140, set out as a note under
section 1913 of this title.