§2803 — Title 33 Navigation and Navigable Waters | U.S. Code

Summary

The Administrator and the Under Secretary must work with federal, state, and local agencies to create and run a long-term program that gathers and studies scientific data about the Nation’s coastal water quality. The main EPA leadership for this work must be at the Environmental Research Laboratory in Narragansett, Rhode Island. The program must check water quality, sediment quality, and the health of living coastal resources; find sources of pollution; judge how government actions affect coastal waters; measure floatable debris; study short- and long-term trends; and set up intensive monitoring where needed. Within 18 months after October 29, 1992, the Administrator and the Under Secretary must issue monitoring guidelines that create consistent but flexible methods, allow simple surveys and more detailed studies, identify pollution sources (including point and nonpoint), track progress over time, make data compatible for sharing, and name the physical, chemical, and biological indicators to use. The guidelines must include protocols for designing statistically valid networks, sampling and analysis, and quality control, and must be reviewed from time to time. Within 24 months after October 29, 1992, and later as needed, they must pick areas for intensive monitoring based on a National Research Council study (the NRC must report within 18 months after October 29, 1992). Multi-year intensive programs must be made for Massachusetts and Cape Cod Bays, the Gulf of Maine, the Chesapeake Bay, the Hudson-Raritan Estuary, and other designated areas. Each intensive program must state goals, list what will be measured, describe monitoring methods and data handling, name who will run it, give a schedule, estimate costs, and say how success will be judged and changed. Before starting intensive programs, the agencies must sign a Memorandum of Understanding spelling out responsibilities. The Administrator and the Under Secretary must also send Congress a Comprehensive Implementation Strategy within 1 year after October 29, 1992, after consulting other agencies and Governors and publishing a draft at least 3 months before final submission. Federal aid for non-Federal partners may be given only if at least 50 percent of the monitoring costs come from non-Federal funds.

Title 33, §2803

Navigation and Navigable Waters — Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)(1)The Administrator and the Under Secretary, in conjunction with other Federal, State, and local authorities, shall jointly develop and implement a program for the long-term collection, assimilation, and analysis of scientific data designed to measure the environmental quality of the Nation’s coastal ecosystems pursuant to this section. Monitoring conducted pursuant to this section shall be coordinated with relevant monitoring programs conducted by the Administrator, Under Secretary, and other Federal, State, and local authorities.

(2)Primary leadership for the monitoring program activities conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to this section shall be located at the Environmental Research Laboratory in Narragansett, Rhode Island.

(b)The Comprehensive Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Program shall include, but not be limited to—

(1)identification and analysis of the status of environmental quality in the Nation’s coastal ecosystems, including but not limited to, assessment of—

(A)ambient water quality, including contaminant levels in relation to criteria and standards issued pursuant to title III or 11 So in original. Probably should be “of”. the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1311 et seq.);

(B)benthic environmental quality, including analysis of contaminant levels in sediments in relation to criteria and standards issued pursuant to title III of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1311 et seq.); and

(C)health and quality of living resources.22 So in original. The period probably should be a semicolon.

(2)identification of sources of environmental degradation affecting the Nation’s coastal ecosystems;

(3)assessment of the impact of governmental programs and management strategies and measures designed to abate or prevent the environmental degradation of the Nation’s coastal ecosystems;

(4)assessment of the accumulation of floatables along coastal shorelines;

(5)analysis of expected short-term and long-term trends in the environmental quality of the Nation’s coastal ecosystems; and

(6)the development and implementation of intensive coastal water quality monitoring programs in accordance with subsection (d).

(c)(1)Not later than 18 months after October 29, 1992, the Administrator and the Under Secretary shall jointly issue coastal water quality monitoring guidelines to assist in the development and implementation of coastal water quality monitoring programs. The guidelines shall—

(A)provide an appropriate degree of uniformity among the coastal water quality monitoring methods and data while preserving the flexibility of monitoring programs to address specific needs;

(B)establish scientifically valid monitoring methods that will—

(i)provide simplified methods to survey and assess the water quality and ecological health of coastal waters;

(ii)identify and quantify through more intensive efforts the severity of existing or anticipated problems in selected coastal waters;

(iii)identify and quantify sources of pollution that cause or contribute to those problems, including point and nonpoint sources; and

(iv)evaluate over time the effectiveness of efforts to reduce or eliminate pollution from those sources;

(C)provide for data compatibility to enable data to be efficiently stored and shared by various users; and

(D)identify appropriate physical, chemical, and biological indicators of the health and quality of coastal ecosystems.

(2)Guidelines issued under paragraph (1) shall include protocols for—

(A)designing statistically valid coastal water quality monitoring networks and monitoring surveys, including assessment of the accumulation of floatables.2

(B)sampling and analysis, including appropriate physical and chemical parameters, living resource parameters, and sediment analysis techniques; and

(C)quality control, quality assessment, and data consistency and management.

(3)The Administrator and the Under Secretary shall periodically review the guidelines and protocols issued under this subsection to evaluate their effectiveness, the degree to which they continue to answer program objectives and provide an appropriate degree of uniformity while taking local conditions into account, and any need to modify or supplement them with new guidelines and protocols, as needed.

(4)The Administrator or a State permitting authority shall ensure that compliance monitoring conducted pursuant to section 402(a)(2) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342(a)(2)) for permits for discharges to coastal waters is consistent with the guidelines issued under this subsection. Any modifications of discharge permits necessary to implement this subsection shall be deemed to be minor modifications of such permit. Nothing in this subsection requires dischargers to conduct monitoring other than compliance monitoring pursuant to permits under section 402(a)(2) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342(a)(2)).

(d)(1)The Comprehensive Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Program established pursuant to this section shall include intensive coastal water quality monitoring programs developed under this subsection.

(2)Not later than 24 months after October 29, 1992, and periodically thereafter, the Administrator and the Under Secretary shall, based on recommendations by the National Research Council, jointly designate coastal areas to be intensively monitored.

(3)(A)The Administrator and the Under Secretary shall contract with the National Research Council to conduct a study to identify coastal areas suitable for the establishment of intensive coastal monitoring programs. In identifying these coastal areas, the National Research Council shall consider areas that—

(i)are representatives of coastal ecosystems throughout the United States;

(ii)will provide information to assess the status and trends of coastal water quality nation-wide; and

(iii)would benefit from intensive water quality monitoring because of local management needs.

(B)In making recommendations under this paragraph, the National Research Council shall consult with Regional Research Boards established pursuant to title IV of this Act [16 U.S.C. 1447 et seq.].

(C)The National Research Council shall, within 18 months of October 29, 1992, submit a report to the Administrator and the Under Secretary listing areas suitable for intensive monitoring.

(D)The Administrator and the Under Secretary, in conjunction with other Federal, State, and local authorities, shall develop and implement multi-year programs of intensive monitoring for Massachusetts and Cape Cod Bays, the Gulf of Maine, the Chesapeake Bay, the Hudson-Raritan Estuary, and each area jointly designated by the Administrator and the Under Secretary pursuant to paragraph (2).

(4)Each intensive coastal water quality monitoring program developed pursuant to this subsection shall—

(A)identify water quality conditions and problems and provide information to assist in improving coastal water quality;

(B)clearly state the goals and objectives of the monitoring program and their relationship to the water quality objectives for coastal waters covered by the program;

(C)identify the water quality and biological parameters of the monitoring program and their relationship to these goals and objectives;

(D)describe the types of monitoring networks, surveys and other activities to be used to achieve these goals and objectives, using where appropriate the guidelines issued under subsection (c);

(E)survey existing Federal, State, and local coastal monitoring activities and private compliance monitoring activities in or on the coastal waters covered by the program, describe the relationship of the program to those other monitoring activities, and integrate them, as appropriate, into the intensive monitoring program;

(F)describe the data management and quality control components of the program;

(G)specify the implementation requirements for the program, including—

(i)the lead Federal, State, or regional authority that will administer the program;

(ii)the public and private parties that will implement the program;

(iii)a detailed schedule for program implementation;

(iv)all Federal and State responsibilities for implementing the program; and

(v)the changes in Federal, State, and local monitoring programs necessary to implement the program;

(H)estimate the costs to Federal and State governments, and other participants, of implementing the monitoring program; and

(I)describe the methods to assess periodically the success of the monitoring program in meeting its goals and objectives, and the manner in which the program may be modified from time-to-time.

(5)In addition to the criteria listed in paragraph (4), the intensive monitoring program for Massachusetts and Cape Cod Bays shall establish baseline data on environmental phenomena (such as quantity of bacteria and quality of indigenous species, and swimmability) and determine the ecological impacts resulting from major point source discharges.

(6)Prior to implementing any intensive coastal water quality monitoring program under this subsection, the Administrator and the Under Secretary shall enter into a Memorandum of Understanding to implement the intensive coastal water quality monitoring programs and may extend the memorandum 33 So in original. Probably should be capitalized. of Understanding to include other appropriate Federal agencies. The Memorandum of Understanding shall identify the monitoring and reporting responsibilities of each agency and shall encourage the coordination of monitoring activities.

(7)(A)The Administrator, the Under Secretary, and the Governor of each State having waters subject to an intensive coastal water quality monitoring program developed pursuant to this subsection shall ensure compliance with that program.

(B)The Administrator and the Under Secretary are authorized to enter into cooperative agreements to provide financial assistance to non-Federal agencies and institutions to support implementation of intensive monitoring programs under this subsection. Federal financial assistance may only be provided on the condition that not less than fifty percent of the costs of the monitoring to be conducted by a non-Federal agency or institution is provided from non-Federal funds.

(e)(1)Within 1 year after October 29, 1992, the Administrator and the Under Secretary shall jointly submit to Congress a Comprehensive Implementation Strategy identifying the current and planned activities to implement the Comprehensive Coastal Monitoring Program pursuant to this section.

(2)The Administrator and the Under Secretary shall consult with the National Academy of Sciences, the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the Director of the Minerals Management Service, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, the Secretary of the Navy, the Secretary of Agriculture, the heads of any other relevant Federal or regional agencies, and the Governors of coastal States in developing the Strategy.

(3)Not less than 3 months before submitting the Strategy to Congress, the Administrator and the Under Secretary shall jointly publish a draft version of the Strategy in the Federal Register and shall solicit public comments regarding the Strategy.

(4)Within 1 year after submission of the Strategy under paragraph (1), the Administrator and the Under Secretary shall enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with appropriate Federal agencies necessary to effect the coordination of Federal coastal monitoring programs. The Memorandum of Understanding shall identify the monitoring and reporting responsibilities of each agency and shall encourage the coordination of monitoring activities where possible.

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

References in Text

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is act June 30, 1948, ch. 758, as amended generally by Pub. L. 92–500, § 2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 816. Title III of the Act is classified generally to subchapter III (§ 1311 et seq.) of chapter 26 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see

Short Title

note set out under section 1251 of this title and Tables. Title IV of this Act, referred to in subsec. (d)(3)(B), is title IV of Pub. L. 92–532 which is classified generally to chapter 32A (§ 1447 et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see section 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.

Executive Documents

Transfer of Functions

The Minerals Management Service was abolished and functions divided among the Office of Natural Resources Revenue, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental

Enforcement

. See Secretary of the Interior Orders No. 3299 of

May 19, 2010, and No. 3302 of

June 18, 2010, and chapters II, V, and XII of title 30, Code of Federal

Regulations

, as revised by final rules of the Department of the Interior at 75 F.R. 61051 and 76 F.R. 64432.

§2803 Comprehensive Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Program

Summary

Title 33, §2803

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

References in Text

Short Title

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Transfer of Functions

Executive Documents

Transfer of Functions

Enforcement

Regulations

Citations & Metadata