Title 35 — PatentsRelease 119-73
§375 Patent issued on international application: Effect
Title 35 › Part PART IV— - PATENT COOPERATION TREATY › Chapter CHAPTER 37— - NATIONAL STAGE › § 375
Summary
The Director may issue a U.S. patent from an international application that names the United States. That patent has the same legal effect as a patent granted from a U.S. national application. If the application wasn’t in English and a wrong translation made the patent broader than the original, a court can narrow it and rule that the extra parts cannot be enforced.
Full Legal Text
Title 35, §375
Patents — Source: USLM XML via OLRC
(a)A patent may be issued by the Director based on an international application designating the United States, in accordance with the provisions of this title. Such patent shall have the force and effect of a patent issued on a national application filed under the provisions of chapter 11.
(b)Where due to an incorrect translation the scope of a patent granted on an international application designating the United States, which was not originally filed in the English language, exceeds the scope of the international application in its original language, a court of competent jurisdiction may retroactively limit the scope of the patent, by declaring it unenforceable to the extent that it exceeds the scope of the international application in its original language.
Legislative History
Notes & Related Subsidiaries
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2011—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 112–29, § 20(j), struck out “of this title” after “102(e)” and after “11”. Pub. L. 112–29, § 3(g)(5), which directed substitution of “Such” for “Subject to section 102(e) of this title, such”, was executed by making the substitution for “Subject to section 102(e), such”, to reflect the probable intent of Congress, because the words “of this title” did not appear after “section 102(e)” subsequent to amendment by Pub. L. 112–29, § 20(j). See note above and
Effective Date
of 2011 Amendment notes below. 2002—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below. 1999—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted “Director” for “Commissioner”.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
of 2011 AmendmentAmendment by section 3(g)(5) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 18-month period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to certain applications for patent and any patents issuing thereon, see section 3(n) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as an
Effective Date
of 2011 Amendment;
Savings Provision
s note under section 100 of this title. Amendment by section 20(j) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that
Effective Date
, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.
Effective Date
of 1999 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective Jan. 24, 1978, and applicable to international and national applications filed, on and after that date, see section 11 of Pub. L. 94–131, set out as a note under section 351 of this title.
Reference
Citations & Metadata
Citation
35 U.S.C. § 375
Title 35 — Patents
Last Updated
Apr 6, 2026
Release point: 119-73