Title 42The Public Health and WelfareRelease 119-73

§4014 Estimates of premium rates

Title 42 › Chapter CHAPTER 50— - NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— - THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM › § 4014

Last updated Apr 6, 2026|Official source

Summary

The Administrator must study areas and set estimates for flood-insurance premium rates. Rates must reflect the actual flood risk using standard actuarial methods and must take into account what owners or renters have done to reduce risk (like land-use rules, floodproofing, and forecasting). The prices must include operating costs in the schedules under section 4018, administrative costs the Administrator thinks belong in the rates, and any other administrative costs recovered by a fee charged to policyholders that is not subject to agents’ commissions, company expense allowances, or State or local premium taxes. Rates must also include all costs required by accepted ratemaking standards, such as expected future costs and costs to transfer risk. The Administrator must also estimate lower, subsidized rates that would still be reasonable and encourage people to buy insurance, but those lower rates must not apply to non-primary residences, severe repetitive loss properties, properties with total payouts equal to or over the property’s fair market value, business properties, or properties that on or after July 6, 2012, had substantial damage or improvements over 50 percent of fair market value. The Administrator must also estimate how flood protections built after August 1, 1968, affect rates. When doing these studies, the Administrator should use other federal agencies (Department of the Army, Interior, Agriculture, Commerce, and the Tennessee Valley Authority) when possible and may make agreements to get help. Priority goes to places that show interest in buying flood insurance. Special rules let certain Louisiana structures that existed on December 31, 1973, get insurance at rates no higher than if the Atchafalaya levee system hadn’t added hazards. A community that has made “adequate progress” on a 100-year flood-protection system may get rates as if the system were finished; adequate progress means 100% authorized, at least 60% appropriated, at least 50% spent, and at least 50% complete. Similar relief applies to communities restoring disaccredited levees. The Administrator must not offer lower rates to policies that lapsed (unless coverage was no longer required) or to people who refuse offered mitigation help (including relocation) after a major disaster or for repetitive loss properties. A “severe repetitive loss property” for 1–4 unit homes is one with either four or more claim payments over $5,000 each totaling more than $20,000, or at least two payments that together exceed the property’s value; the rule for 5+ unit properties will be set by the Administrator.

Full Legal Text

Title 42, §4014

The Public Health and Welfare — Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)The Administrator is authorized to undertake and carry out such studies and investigations and receive or exchange such information as may be necessary to estimate, and shall from time to time estimate, on an area, subdivision, or other appropriate basis—
(1)the risk premium rates for flood insurance which—
(A)based on consideration of—
(i)the risk involved and accepted actuarial principles; and
(ii)the flood mitigation activities that an owner or lessee has undertaken on a property, including differences in the risk involved due to land use measures, floodproofing, flood forecasting, and similar measures, and
(B)including—
(i)the applicable operating costs and allowances set forth in the schedules prescribed under section 4018 of this title and reflected in such rates,
(ii)any administrative expenses (or portion of such expenses) of carrying out the flood insurance program which, in his discretion, should properly be reflected in such rates,
(iii)any remaining administrative expenses incurred in carrying out the flood insurance and floodplain management programs (including the costs of mapping activities under section 4101 of this title) not included under clause (ii), which shall be recovered by a fee charged to policyholders and such fee shall not be subject to any agents’ commissions, company expense allowances, or State or local premium taxes, and
(iv)all costs, as prescribed by principles and standards of practice in ratemaking adopted by the American Academy of Actuaries and the Casualty Actuarial Society, including—
(I)an estimate of the expected value of future costs,
(II)all costs associated with the transfer of risk, and
(III)the costs associated with an individual risk transfer with respect to risk classes, as defined by the Administrator,
(2)the rates, if less than the rates estimated under paragraph (1), which would be reasonable, would encourage prospective insureds to purchase flood insurance, and would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter, and which, together with a fee charged to policyholders that shall not be not subject to any agents’ commission, company expenses allowances, or State or local premium taxes, shall include any administrative expenses incurred in carrying out the flood insurance and floodplain management programs (including the costs of mapping activities under section 4101 of this title), except that the Administrator shall not estimate rates under this paragraph for—
(A)any residential property which is not the primary residence of an individual;
(B)any severe repetitive loss property;
(C)any property that has incurred flood-related damage in which the cumulative amounts of payments under this chapter equaled or exceeded the fair market value of such property;
(D)any business property; or
(E)any property which on or after July 6, 2012, has experienced or sustained—
(i)substantial damage exceeding 50 percent of the fair market value of such property; or
(ii)substantial improvement exceeding 50 percent of the fair market value of such property; and
(3)the extent, if any, to which federally assisted or other flood protection measures initiated after August 1, 1968, affect such rates.
(b)In carrying out subsection (a), the Administrator shall, to the maximum extent feasible and on a reimbursement basis, utilize the services of the Department of the Army, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Commerce, and the Tennessee Valley Authority, and, as appropriate, other Federal departments or agencies, and for such purposes may enter into agreements or other appropriate arrangements with any persons.
(c)The Administrator shall give priority to conducting studies and investigations and making estimates under this section in those States or areas (or subdivisions thereof) which he has determined have evidenced a positive interest in securing flood insurance coverage under the flood insurance program.
(d)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any structure existing on December 31, 1973, and located within Avoyelles, Evangeline, Rapides, or Saint Landry Parish in the State of Louisiana, which the Secretary determines is subject to additional flood hazards as a result of the construction or operation of the Atchafalaya Basin Levee System, shall be eligible for flood insurance under this chapter (if and to the extent it is eligible for such insurance under the other provisions of this chapter) at premium rates that shall not exceed those which would be applicable if such additional hazards did not exist.
(e)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any community that has made adequate progress, acceptable to the Administrator, on the construction or reconstruction of a flood protection system which will afford flood protection for the one-hundred year frequency flood as determined by the Administrator, shall be eligible for flood insurance under this chapter (if and to the extent it is eligible for such insurance under the other provisions of this chapter) at premium rates not exceeding those which would be applicable under this section if such flood protection system had been completed. The Administrator shall find that adequate progress on the construction or reconstruction of a flood protection system, based on the present value of the completed flood protection system, has been made only if: (1) 100 percent of the cost of the system has been authorized; (2) at least 60 percent of the cost of the system has been appropriated; (3) at least 50 percent of the cost of the system has been expended; and (4) the system is at least 50 percent completed. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in determining whether a community has made adequate progress on the construction, reconstruction, or improvement of a flood protection system, the Administrator shall consider all sources of funding, including Federal, State, and local funds.
(f)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, this subsection shall apply to riverine and coastal levees that are located in a community which has been determined by the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to be in the process of restoring flood protection afforded by a flood protection system that had been previously accredited on a Flood Insurance Rate Map as providing 100-year frequency flood protection but no longer does so, and shall apply without regard to the level of Federal funding of or participation in the construction, reconstruction, or improvement of the flood protection system. Except as provided in this subsection, in such a community, flood insurance shall be made available to those properties impacted by the disaccreditation of the flood protection system at premium rates that do not exceed those which would be applicable to any property located in an area of special flood hazard, the construction of which was started prior to the effective date of the initial Flood Insurance Rate Map published by the Administrator for the community in which such property is located. A revised Flood Insurance Rate Map shall be prepared for the community to delineate as Zone AR the areas of special flood hazard that result from the disaccreditation of the flood protection system. A community will be considered to be in the process of restoration if—
(1)the flood protection system has been deemed restorable by a Federal agency in consultation with the local project sponsor;
(2)a minimum level of flood protection is still provided to the community by the disaccredited system; and
(3)restoration of the flood protection system is scheduled to occur within a designated time period and in accordance with a progress plan negotiated between the community and the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
(g)The Administrator shall not provide flood insurance to prospective insureds at rates less than those estimated under subsection (a)(1), as required by paragraph (2) of that subsection, for—
(1)any policy under the flood insurance program that has lapsed in coverage,,11 So in original. unless the decision of the policy holder to permit a lapse in flood insurance coverage was as a result of the property covered by the policy no longer being required to retain such coverage; or
(2)any prospective insured who refuses to accept any offer for mitigation assistance by the Administrator (including an offer to relocate), including an offer of mitigation assistance—
(A)following a major disaster, as defined in section 5122 of this title; or
(B)in connection with—
(i)a repetitive loss property; or
(ii)a severe repetitive loss property.
(h)In this section, the term “severe repetitive loss property” has the following meaning:
(1)In the case of a property consisting of 1 to 4 residences, such term means a property that—
(A)is covered under a contract for flood insurance made available under this chapter; and
(B)has incurred flood-related damage—
(i)for which 4 or more separate claims payments have been made under flood insurance coverage under this subchapter, with the amount of each such claim exceeding $5,000, and with the cumulative amount of such claims payments exceeding $20,000; or
(ii)for which at least 2 separate claims payments have been made under such coverage, with the cumulative amount of such claims exceeding the value of the property.
(2)In the case of a property consisting of 5 or more residences, such term shall have such meaning as the Director 22 So in original. Probably means “Administrator”. shall by regulation provide.

Legislative History

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a)(2), (d), (e), and (h)(1)(A), was in the original a reference to “this title” meaning title XIII of Pub. L. 90–448, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 572, known as the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see

Short Title

note set out under section 4001 of this title and Tables.

Amendments

2014—Subsec. (a)(1)(A). Pub. L. 113–89, § 14, amended subpar. (A) generally. Prior to amendment, subpar. (A) read as follows: “based on consideration of the risk involved and accepted actuarial principles, and”. Subsec. (a)(2)(E)(ii). Pub. L. 113–89, § 15, substituted “50 percent” for “30 percent”. Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 113–89, § 19(a)(3), inserted before period at end “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in determining whether a community has made adequate progress on the

Construction

, re

Construction

, or improvement of a flood protection system, the Administrator shall consider all sources of funding, including Federal, State, and local funds.” Pub. L. 113–89, § 19(a)(1), (2), inserted “or re

Construction

” after “

Construction

” in first sentence and amended second sentence generally. Prior to amendment, second sentence read as follows: “The Administrator shall find that adequate progress on the

Construction

of a flood protection system as required herein has been only if (1) 100 percent of the project cost of the system has been authorized, (2) at least 60 percent of the project cost of the system has been appropriated, (3) at least 50 percent of the project cost of the system has been expended, and (4) the system is at least 50 percent completed.” Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 113–89, § 19(b), amended first sentence generally. Prior to amendment, first sentence read as follows: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, this subsection shall only apply in a community which has been determined by the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to be in the process of restoring flood protection afforded by a flood protection system that had been previously accredited on a Flood Insurance Rate Map as providing 100-year frequency flood protection but no longer does so.” Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 113–89, § 3(a)(1), redesignated pars. (3) and (4) as (1) and (2), respectively, substituted “, unless the decision of the policy holder to permit a lapse in flood insurance coverage was as a result of the property covered by the policy no longer being required to retain such coverage” for “as a result of the deliberate choice of the holder of such policy” in par. (1) as redesignated, and struck out former pars. (1) and (2), which read as follows: “(1) any property not insured by the flood insurance program as of
July 6, 2012; “(2) any property purchased after
July 6, 2012;”. 2012—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 112–141, § 100238(b)(1), substituted “Administrator” for “Director” in introductory provisions. Subsec. (a)(1)(B)(iv). Pub. L. 112–141, § 100205(b), added cl. (iv). Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 112–141, § 100205(a)(1)(A), substituted “for—” for “for any residential property which is not the primary residence of an individual; and” and added subpars. (A) to (E). Pub. L. 112–123 inserted “, except that the Administrator shall not estimate rates under this paragraph for any residential property which is not the primary residence of an individual” before “; and”. Subsecs. (b), (c), (e), (f). Pub. L. 112–141, § 100238(b)(1), substituted “Administrator” for “Director” wherever appearing. Subsecs. (g), (h). Pub. L. 112–141, § 100205(a)(1)(B), added subsecs. (g) and (h). 1992—Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 102–550 added subsec. (f). 1990—Subsec. (a)(1)(B)(iii). Pub. L. 101–508, § 2302(e)(1)(A)–(C), added cl. (iii). Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 101–508, § 2302(e)(1)(D), inserted before semicolon “, and which, together with a fee charged to policyholders that shall not be not subject to any agents’ commission, company expenses allowances, or State or local premium taxes, shall include any administrative expenses incurred in carrying out the flood insurance and floodplain management programs (including the costs of mapping activities under section 4101 of this title)”. 1983—Subsecs. (a) to (c), (e). Pub. L. 98–181 substituted “Director” for “Secretary” wherever appearing. 1974—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 93–383 added subsec. (e). 1973—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 93–234 added subsec. (d).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date

of 2012 Amendment Pub. L. 112–141, div. F, title II, § 100205(a)(2), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 918, provided that: “The

Amendments

made by paragraph (1) [amending this section] shall become effective 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [July 6, 2012].”

Effective Date

Section effective 120 days following Aug. 1, 1968, or such later date prescribed by the Secretary but in no event more than 180 days following Aug. 1, 1968, see section 1377 of Pub. L. 90–448, set out as a note under section 4001 of this title.

Transfer of Functions

For transfer of all functions, personnel, assets, components, authorities, grant programs, and liabilities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including the functions of the Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management relating thereto, to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, see section 315(a)(1) of Title 6, Domestic Security. For

Transfer of Functions

, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including the functions of the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see former section 313(1) and section 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6. Repeal of Certain Rate Increases Pub. L. 113–89, § 3, Mar. 21, 2014, 128 Stat. 1021, provided that: “(a) Repeal.—“(1) In general.— [Amended this section.] “(2)

Effective Date

.—The Administrator [of the Federal Emergency Management Agency] shall make available such rate tables, as necessary to implement the

Amendments

made by paragraph (1) as if it were enacted as part of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ([subtitle A of title II of div. F of] Public Law 112–141; 126 Stat. 957 [sic]). “(3) Implementation, coordination, and guidance.—“(A) Facilitation of timely refunds.—To ensure the participation of Write Your Own companies (as such term is defined in section 100202(a) of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (42 U.S.C. 4004(a)), the Administrator and the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall consult with Write Your Own companies throughout the development of guidance and rate tables necessary to implement the provisions of and the

Amendments

made by this Act [see

Short Title

of 2014 Amendment note set out under section 4001 of this title]. “(B) Implementation and guidance.—The Administrator shall issue final guidance and rate tables necessary to implement the provisions of and the

Amendments

made by this Act not later than eight months following the date of the enactment of this Act [Mar. 21, 2014]. Write Your Own companies, in coordination with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, shall have not less than six months but not more than eight months following the issuance of such final guidance and rate tables to implement the changes required by such final guidance and rate tables. “(4) Refund of excess premium charges collected.—The Administrator shall refund directly to insureds any premiums for flood insurance coverage under the National Flood Insurance Program [defined as the program established under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.)] collected in excess of the rates required under the provisions of and

Amendments

made by this section [amending this section]. To allow for necessary and appropriate implementation of such provisions and

Amendments

, any premium changes necessary to implement such provisions and

Amendments

, including any such premium refund due to policy holders, which shall be paid directly by the National Flood Insurance Program, shall not be charged or paid to policyholders by the National Flood Insurance Program until after the Administrator issues guidance and makes available such rate tables to implement the provisions of and

Amendments

made by this Act. “(b) Assumption of Policies at Existing Premium Rates.—The Administrator shall provide that the purchaser of a property that, as of the date of such purchase, is covered under an existing flood insurance policy under this title [probably means the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.] may assume such existing policy and coverage for the remainder of the term of the policy at the chargeable premium rates under such existing policy. Such rates shall continue with respect to such property until the implementation of subsection (a).” Changes in Rates Resulting From Pub. L. 113–89 Pub. L. 113–89, § 31(a), Mar. 21, 2014, 128 Stat. 1035, provided that: “Not later than the date that is 6 months before the date on which any change in risk premium rates for flood insurance coverage under the National Flood Insurance Program [defined as the program established under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.)] resulting from this Act [see

Short Title

of 2014 Amendment note set out under section 4001 of this title] or any amendment made by this Act is implemented, the Administrator [of the Federal Emergency Management Agency] shall make publicly available the rate tables and underwriting guidelines that provide the basis for the change.” Eligibility for Flood Insurance for Persons Residing in Communities That Have Made Adequate Progress on the Re

Construction

or Improvement of a Flood Protection System Pub. L. 112–141, div. F, title II, § 100230, July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 946, provided that: “(a) Eligibility for Flood Insurance Coverage.—“(1) In general.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law (including section 1307(e) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4014(e))), a person residing in a community that the Administrator determines has made adequate progress on the re

Construction

or improvement of a flood protection system that will afford flood protection for a 100-year floodplain (without regard to the level of Federal funding of or participation in the

Construction

, re

Construction

, or improvement), shall be eligible for flood insurance coverage under the National Flood Insurance Program—“(A) if the person resides in a community that is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program; and “(B) at a risk premium rate that does not exceed the risk premium rate that would be chargeable if the flood protection system had been completed. “(2) Adequate progress.—“(A) Re

Construction

or improvement.—For purposes of paragraph (1), the Administrator shall determine that a community has made adequate progress on the re

Construction

or improvement of a flood protection system if—“(i) 100 percent of the project cost has been authorized; “(ii) not less than 60 percent of the project cost has been secured or appropriated; “(iii) not less than 50 percent of the flood protection system has been assessed as being without deficiencies; and “(iv) the re

Construction

or improvement has a project schedule that does not exceed 5 years, beginning on the date on which the re

Construction

or

Construction

of the improvement commences. “(B) Considerations.—In determining whether a flood protection system has been assessed as being without deficiencies, the Administrator shall consider the requirements under section 65.10 of chapter 44, Code of Federal

Regulations

, or any successor thereto. “(C) Date of commencement.—For purposes of subparagraph (A)(iv) of this paragraph and subsection (b)(2)(B), the date of commencement of the re

Construction

or improvement of a flood protection system that is undergoing re

Construction

or improvement on the date of enactment of this Act [July 6, 2012] shall be deemed to be the date on which the owner of the flood protection system submits a request under paragraph (3). “(3) Request for determination.—The owner of a flood protection system that is undergoing re

Construction

or improvement on the date of enactment of this Act [July 6, 2012] may submit to the Administrator a request for a determination under paragraph (2) that the community in which the flood protection system is located has made adequate progress on the re

Construction

or improvement of the flood protection system. “(4) Rule of

Construction

.—Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prohibit the Administrator from making a determination under paragraph (2) for any community in which a flood protection system is not undergoing re

Construction

or improvement on the date of enactment of this Act. “(b) Termination of Eligibility.—“(1) Adequate continuing progress.—The Administrator shall issue rules to establish a method of determining whether a community has made adequate continuing progress on the re

Construction

or improvement of a flood protection system that includes—“(A) a requirement that the Administrator shall—“(i) consult with the owner of the flood protection system— “(I) 6 months after the date of a determination under subsection (a); “(II) 18 months after the date of a determination under subsection (a); and “(III) 36 months after the date of a determination under subsection (a); and “(ii) after each consultation under clause (i), determine whether the re

Construction

or improvement is reasonably likely to be completed in accordance with the project schedule described in subsection (a)(2)(A)(iv); and “(B) a requirement that, if the Administrator makes a determination under subparagraph (A)(ii) that re

Construction

or improvement is not reasonably likely to be completed in accordance with the project schedule, the Administrator shall—“(i) not later than 30 days after the date of the determination, notify the owner of the flood protection system of the determination and provide the rationale and evidence for the determination; and “(ii) provide the owner of the flood protection system the opportunity to appeal the determination. “(2) Termination.—The Administrator shall terminate the eligibility for flood insurance coverage under subsection (a) for persons residing in a community with respect to which the Administrator made a determination under subsection (a) if—“(A) the Administrator determines that the community has not made adequate continuing progress; or “(B) on the date that is 5 years after the date on which the re

Construction

or

Construction

of the improvement commences, the project has not been completed. “(3) Waiver.—A person whose eligibility would otherwise be terminated under paragraph (2)(B) shall continue to be eligible to purchase flood insurance coverage described in subsection (a) if the Administrator determines—“(A) the community has made adequate continuing progress on the re

Construction

or improvement of a flood protection system; and “(B) there is a reasonable expectation that the re

Construction

or improvement of the flood protection system will be completed not later than 1 year after the date of the determination under this paragraph. “(4) Risk premium rate.—If the Administrator terminates the eligibility of persons residing in a community to purchase flood insurance coverage described in subsection (a), the Administrator shall establish an appropriate risk premium rate for flood insurance coverage under the National Flood Insurance Program for persons residing in the community that purchased flood insurance coverage before the date on which the termination of eligibility takes effect, taking into consideration the then-current state of the flood protection system. “(c) Additional Authority.—“(1) Additional authority.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), in exceptional and exigent circumstances, the Administrator may, in the Administrator’s sole discretion, determine that a person residing in a community, which is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program, that has begun re

Construction

or improvement of a flood protection system that will afford flood protection for a 100-year floodplain (without regard to the level of Federal funding of or participation in the re

Construction

or improvement) shall be eligible for flood insurance coverage under the National Flood Insurance Program at a risk premium rate that does not exceed the risk premium rate that would be chargeable if the flood protection system had been completed, provided—“(A) the community makes a written request for the determination setting forth the exceptional and exigent circumstances, including why the community cannot meet the criteria for adequate progress set forth in under [sic] subsection (a)(2)(A) and why immediate relief is necessary; “(B) the Administrator submits a written report setting forth findings of the exceptional and exigent circumstances on which the Administrator based an affirmative determination to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate, and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives not later than 15 days before making the determination; and “(C) the eligibility for flood insurance coverage at a risk premium rate determined under this subsection terminates no later than 1 year after the date on which the Administrator makes the determination. “(2) Limitation.—Upon termination of eligibility under paragraph (1)(C), a community may submit another request pursuant to paragraph (1)(A). The Administrator may make no more than two determinations under paragraph (1) with respect to persons residing within any single requesting community. “(3) Termination.—The authority provided under paragraphs (1) and (2) shall terminate two years after the enactment of this Act [July 6, 2012].” [For definitions of terms used in section 100230 of Pub. L. 112–141, set out above, see section 4004 of this title.] Fees Pub. L. 108–7, div. K, title III, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 517, provided in part: “That beginning in fiscal year 2003 and thereafter, fees authorized in 42 U.S.C. 4014(a)(1)(B)(iii) shall be collected only if provided in advance in appropriations acts.” Study of Economic Effects of Charging Actuarially Based Premium Rates for Pre-FIRM Structures Pub. L. 103–325, title V, § 578, Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2284, required the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to conduct a study of the economic effects that would result from increasing premium rates for flood insurance coverage for pre-FIRM structures and submit a report to Congress no later than 12 months after Sept. 23, 1994. Sea Level Rise Study Pub. L. 101–137, § 5, Nov. 3, 1989, 103 Stat. 825, directed Director of Federal Emergency Management Agency to conduct a study to determine the impact of relative sea level rise on the flood insurance rate maps, such study also to project the economic losses associated with estimated sea level rise and aggregate such data for the United States as a whole and by region, with Director to report results of study to Congress not later than one year after Nov. 3, 1989.

Reference

Citations & Metadata

Citation

42 U.S.C. § 4014

Title 42The Public Health and Welfare

Last Updated

Apr 6, 2026

Release point: 119-73