Title 48 › Chapter CHAPTER 18— - MICRONESIA, MARSHALL ISLANDS, AND PALAU › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— - MICRONESIA AND MARSHALL ISLANDS › Part Part A— - Approval and Implementation of Original Compact › § 1904
Congress approves the Compact and says the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) and the Marshall Islands (RMI) want democratic, constitutional governments that respect human rights. The Secretary of State must include a full report on human rights in FSM and RMI in the yearly human-rights reports to Congress under sections 116 and 502B of the Foreign Assistance Act. People who became citizens of FSM or RMI and then try to use Compact rights to enter or live in the United States may be denied those rights if U.S. officials reasonably conclude the person naturalized mainly to get U.S. entry, following U.S. procedures. Congress supports FSM and RMI rules that limit long-term land sales to their own citizens. Congress understands FSM and RMI will not let other governments or outside parties do the activities listed in section 314(a) of the Compact. Congress also says the U.S. is not responsible for foreign loans or debt of FSM or RMI. The Compact is not meant to hurt U.S. territories or Hawaii. Starting one year after January 14, 1986, and each year after that, any territory or Hawaii can send a report to the Secretary of the Interior by February 1 about Compact impacts. The Secretary will review and send those reports to Congress with administration comments. The Secretary must help provide a census of Micronesians, at intervals no greater than 5 years after each decennial U.S. census, for places that ask, but total spending for that help cannot exceed $300,000 in any year. Reports must list harms and recommend fixes, focusing on trade, taxes, immigration (including how many used the rights in section 141(a) during the year), labor, wages, social services, infrastructure, and the environment; trade reports must analyze American Samoa and canned tuna imports from FSM and RMI. The President must get views from Hawaii, the territories, FSM, RMI, and Palau and send them to Congress. If harms occur, Congress will act quickly to fix them. For fishing, the U.S. does not recognize FSM or RMI claims over highly migratory fish outside their territorial seas. Compact money cannot be used by FSM or RMI to enforce against U.S. vessels fishing those species outside territorial seas unless there is a licensing agreement. U.S. officials will apply the Magnuson‑Stevens Act and the Fishermen’s Protective Act when U.S. vessels are affected, and any presidential certification under that law must include a report and can be null if Congress blocks it by law within 60 days of continuous session. The United States also aims to negotiate a regional tuna licensing agreement with Pacific governments and, when that is sent to the Senate, the Secretary of State must send Congress a proposed long-term regional fisheries development plan that may include stock work, better harvesting, gear, monitoring, training, and assistance.
Full Legal Text
Territories and Insular Possessions — Source: USLM XML via OLRC
Legislative History
Reference
Citation
48 U.S.C. § 1904
Title 48 — Territories and Insular Possessions
Last Updated
Apr 6, 2026
Release point: 119-73