§3352b — Title 50 War and National Defense | U.S. Code

Summary

Within 180 days after December 20, 2019, the Security Executive Agent, working with Council members, must send a report to the right congressional committees and share it with industry partners. The report must check whether the SF-86 form and the Federal Investigative Standards give the right information to support the National Security Adjudicative Guidelines, and point out any information that is not needed. It must look at whether the form, standards, and guidelines should change to deal with the risk of an insider threat. The report must also recommend ways to improve background checks, such as simplifying the SF-86 and helping applicants, using remote tools and central sites instead of all field work, securely digitizing records, growing the investigator workforce, and moving from periodic reinvestigations to continuous vetting when appropriate. Also within 180 days, the Security Executive Agent must create policies and plans for interim clearances and for treating contractors the same way across agencies as government employees. The contractor policy must cover priorities based on mission; standard and digital forms; use of the polygraph; applying the adjudicative rules; recognizing clearances across agencies even if periodic reinvestigations differ; tracking files when people move to the private sector; collecting timelines for contractor moves; reporting incidents and job performance consistent with the Privacy Act; any needed changes to the Federal Acquisition Regulations to speed information sharing; and making contractor clearances portable between contracts and agencies that need the same clearance. The Agent must also make a plan to use reinvestigations only when risk-based, test automated checks and continuous vetting, allow exceptions if the Agent decides and gives written justification to the appropriate congressional committees, accept automated records checks from prior employers, set rules for using private-sector background data, and set uniform standards so continuous vetting can replace periodic investigations when appropriate.

Title 50, §3352b

War and National Defense — Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)Not later than 180 days after December 20, 2019, the Security Executive Agent, in coordination with the members of the Council, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and make available to appropriate industry partners a report that includes the following:

(1)A review of whether the information requested on the Questionnaire for National Security Positions (Standard Form 86) and by the Federal Investigative Standards prescribed by the Suitability and Credentialing Executive Agent and the Security Executive Agent appropriately supports the adjudicative guidelines under Security Executive Agent Directive 4 (known as the “National Security Adjudicative Guidelines”). Such review shall include identification of whether any such information currently collected is unnecessary to support the adjudicative guidelines.

(2)An assessment of whether such Questionnaire, Standards, and guidelines should be revised to account for the prospect of a holder of a security clearance becoming an insider threat.

(3)Recommendations to improve the background investigation process by—

(A)simplifying the Questionnaire for National Security Positions (Standard Form 86) and increasing customer support to applicants completing such Questionnaire;

(B)using remote techniques and centralized locations to support or replace field investigation work;

(C)using secure and reliable digitization of information obtained during the clearance process;

(D)building the capacity of the background investigation workforce; and

(E)replacing periodic reinvestigations with continuous vetting techniques in all appropriate circumstances.

(b)Not later than 180 days after December 20, 2019, the Security Executive Agent shall, in coordination with the members of the Council, establish the following:

(1)A policy and implementation plan for the issuance of interim security clearances.

(2)A policy and implementation plan to ensure contractors are treated consistently in the security clearance process across agencies and departments of the United States as compared to employees of such agencies and departments. Such policy shall address—

(A)prioritization of processing security clearances based on the mission the contractors will be performing;

(B)standardization in the forms that agencies issue to initiate the process for a security clearance;

(C)digitization of background investigation-related forms;

(D)use of the polygraph;

(E)the application of the adjudicative guidelines under Security Executive Agent Directive 4 (known as the “National Security Adjudicative Guidelines”);

(F)reciprocal recognition of clearances across agencies and departments of the United States, regardless of status of periodic reinvestigation;

(G)tracking of clearance files as individuals move from employment with an agency or department of the United States to employment in the private sector;

(H)collection of timelines for movement of contractors across agencies and departments;

(I)reporting on security incidents and job performance, consistent with section 552a of title 5 (commonly known as the “Privacy Act of 1974”), that may affect the ability to hold a security clearance;

(J)any recommended changes to the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) necessary to ensure that information affecting contractor clearances or suitability is appropriately and expeditiously shared between and among agencies and contractors; and

(K)portability of contractor security clearances between or among contracts at the same agency and between or among contracts at different agencies that require the same level of clearance.

(3)A strategy and implementation plan that—

(A)provides for periodic reinvestigations as part of a security clearance determination only on an as-needed, risk-based basis;

(B)includes actions to assess the extent to which automated records checks and other continuous vetting methods may be used to expedite or focus reinvestigations; and

(C)provides an exception to the requirement under subparagraph (A) for certain populations if the Security Executive Agent—

(i)determines such populations require reinvestigations at regular intervals; and

(ii)provides written justification to the appropriate congressional committees for any such determination.

(4)A policy and implementation plan for agencies and departments of the United States, as a part of the security clearance process, to accept automated records checks generated pursuant to a security clearance applicant’s employment with a prior employer.

(5)A policy for the use of certain background information on individuals collected by the private sector for background investigation purposes.

(6)Uniform standards for agency continuous vetting programs to ensure quality and reciprocity in accepting enrollment in a continuous vetting program as a substitute for a periodic investigation for continued access to classified information.

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Improving Visibility Into the Security Clearance Process Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LIV, § 5401, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2142, provided that: “(a) Definition of Security Executive Agent.—In this section, the term ‘Security Executive Agent’ means the officer serving as the Security Executive Agent pursuant to section 803 of the National Security Act of 1947 [50 U.S.C. 3162a], as added by section 6605. “(b) Policy Required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 20, 2019], the Security Executive Agent shall issue a policy that requires the head of each Federal agency to create, not later than December 31, 2023, an electronic portal that can be used by human resources personnel and applicants for security clearances to view information about the status of an application for a security clearance and the average time required for each phase of the security clearance process.” Definitions For definitions of “Security Executive Agent”, “Council”, “appropriate congressional committees”, “appropriate industry partners”, “Suitability and Credentialing Executive Agent”, “continuous vetting”, and “reciprocity”, referred to in text, see section 3352 of this title.

§3352b Improving the process for security clearances

Summary

Title 50, §3352b

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Citations & Metadata