Title 6Domestic SecurityRelease 119-73

§611 Administration and coordination

Title 6 › Chapter CHAPTER 1— - HOMELAND SECURITY ORGANIZATION › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XV— - HOMELAND SECURITY GRANTS › Part Part B— - Grants Administration › § 611

Last updated Apr 6, 2026|Official source

Summary

The Administrator must make sure that anyone who gets Department grants to prevent, prepare for, protect against, or respond to natural disasters, acts of terrorism, or other man-made disasters (excluding help under section 203, title IV, or title V of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5133, 5170 et seq., and 5191 et seq.)) coordinates, when appropriate, with nearby State, local, and tribal governments. If a grant covers a high-risk urban area or an area that spans more than one State, recipients must also coordinate across State lines, using regional working groups and regional plans when needed. Any State or high-risk urban area that gets a grant under section 604 or 605 must set up a State planning committee or urban area working group to help make and update homeland security plans, do threat and risk assessments, and set funding priorities. Those committees or working groups must include at least one person from each of the main stakeholder groups: local or tribal officials; emergency responders (fire, police, EMS, and emergency managers); public health and other medical staff; representatives of schools and colleges; communications coordinators; and fusion centers. Members should represent the counties, cities, towns, and Indian tribes in the State or urban area, including rural, high-population, and high-threat places. A State or urban area does not have to form a new group if it already uses a multijurisdictional planning committee or commission that meets these rules. Congress also says the Department should run a coordinated system of terrorism-focused and all-hazards grants, keep a proper balance between those funding types as set by titles I and II of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007, and make sure terrorism grants quickly build top capabilities in the highest risk areas while raising basic preparedness nationwide.

Full Legal Text

Title 6, §611

Domestic Security — Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)The Administrator shall ensure that—
(1)all recipients of grants administered by the Department to prevent, prepare for, protect against, or respond to natural disasters, acts of terrorism, or other man-made disasters (excluding assistance provided under section 203, title IV, or title V of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5133, 5170 et seq., and 5191 et seq.)) coordinate, as appropriate, their prevention, preparedness, and protection efforts with neighboring State, local, and tribal governments; and
(2)all high-risk urban areas and other recipients of grants administered by the Department to prevent, prepare for, protect against, or respond to natural disasters, acts of terrorism, or other man-made disasters (excluding assistance provided under section 203, title IV, or title V of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5133, 5170 et seq., and 5191 et seq.)) that include or substantially affect parts or all of more than 1 State coordinate, as appropriate, across State boundaries, including, where appropriate, through the use of regional working groups and requirements for regional plans.
(b)(1)Any State or high-risk urban area receiving a grant under section 604 or 605 of this title shall establish a State planning committee or urban area working group to assist in preparation and revision of the State, regional, or local homeland security plan or the threat and hazard identification and risk assessment, as the case may be, and to assist in determining effective funding priorities for grants under such sections.
(2)(A)The State planning committees and urban area working groups referred to in paragraph (1) shall include at least one representative from each of the following significant stakeholders:
(i)Local or tribal government officials.
(ii)Emergency response providers, which shall include representatives of the fire service, law enforcement, emergency medical services, and emergency managers.
(iii)Public health officials and other appropriate medical practitioners.
(iv)Individuals representing educational institutions, including elementary schools, community colleges, and other institutions of higher education.
(v)State and regional interoperable communications coordinators, as appropriate.
(vi)State and major urban area fusion centers, as appropriate.
(B)The members of the State planning committee or urban area working group, as the case may be, shall be a representative group of individuals from the counties, cities, towns, and Indian tribes within the State or high-risk urban area, including, as appropriate, representatives of rural, high-population, and high-threat jurisdictions.
(3)Nothing in this subsection may be construed to require that any State or high-risk urban area create a State planning committee or urban area working group, as the case may be, if that State or high-risk urban area has established and uses a multijurisdictional planning committee or commission that meets the requirements of this subsection.
(c)It is the sense of Congress that, in order to ensure that the Nation is most effectively able to prevent, prepare for, protect against, and respond to all hazards, including natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters—
(1)the Department should administer a coherent and coordinated system of both terrorism-focused and all-hazards grants;
(2)there should be a continuing and appropriate balance between funding for terrorism-focused and all-hazards preparedness, as reflected in the authorizations of appropriations for grants under the amendments made by titles I and II, as applicable, of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007; and
(3)with respect to terrorism-focused grants, it is necessary to ensure both that the target capabilities of the highest risk areas are achieved quickly and that basic levels of preparedness, as measured by the attainment of target capabilities, are achieved nationwide.

Legislative History

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

References in Text

The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 93–288, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 143. section 203 of the Act is classified to section 5133 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. Titles IV and V of the Act are classified generally to subchapters IV (§ 5170 et seq.) and IV–A (§ 5191 et seq.), respectively, of chapter 68 of Title 42. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see

Short Title

note set out under section 5121 of Title 42 and Tables. The Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007, referred to in subsec. (c)(2), is Pub. L. 110–53, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 266. Title I of the Act enacted this subchapter and amended section 318, 321a, 594, 596, and 752 of this title. Title II of the Act amended section 762 of this title and section 5196c of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of titles I and II to the Code, see Tables.

Amendments

2018—Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 115–278 redesignated subsec. (d) as (c) and struck out former subsec. (c). Prior to amendment, subsec. (c) related to interagency coordination. 2016—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–328 amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) related to planning committees to assist in preparation and revision of State, regional, or local homeland security plans, and to assist in determining effective funding priorities for grants under section 604 and 605 of this title.

Reference

Citations & Metadata

Citation

6 U.S.C. § 611

Title 6Domestic Security

Last Updated

Apr 6, 2026

Release point: 119-73