2025-00251Proposed RuleWallet

States vs. EPA: Pesticide Labels Face Cancer Clash

Published Date: 1/21/2025

Proposed Rule

Summary

The EPA got a petition from 11 states asking to change pesticide labels so they match the EPA’s health risk findings, like cancer or birth defect risks. This means if a state label doesn’t agree with EPA’s health info, it could be called misbranding. Anyone involved with pesticides should weigh in by February 20, 2025, as this could affect labeling rules and compliance costs.

Analyzed Economic Effects

1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.

State Labels vs EPA Risk Findings

The Attorneys General of 11 States (Nebraska, Iowa, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Montana, North Dakota, South Carolina, and South Dakota) asked EPA to amend 40 CFR 156.10(a)(5) to add a new paragraph (xi). The requested change would make any pesticide labeling statements about human health effects (for example, a product's likelihood of causing cancer, birth defects, or reproductive harm) that differ from EPA's findings in its human health risk assessment count as misbranding. Stakeholders can submit comments on the petition identified by docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2024-0562 by February 20, 2025.

Personalized for You

How does this regulation affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Key Dates

Published Date
1/21/2025

Department and Agencies

Department
Independent Agency
Agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Source: View HTML

Related Federal Register Documents

Previous / Next Documents

Back to Federal Register