Government Clarifies Rules for Companies to Whine About Contracts
Published Date: 1/15/2025
Proposed Rule
Summary
The Department of Defense, GSA, and NASA want to make it clearer when companies can protest orders under certain government contracts that have multiple winners. This change affects businesses bidding on these contracts by defining their protest rights more clearly. Comments on this proposal are open until March 17, 2025, so get ready to weigh in!
Analyzed Economic Effects
2 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.
Set‑aside Decisions Not Protestable
The rule says that under 15 U.S.C. 644(r) a contracting officer’s choice to set aside—or not set aside—an order for small business concerns under a multiple‑award contract is an agency discretion and is not a basis for a protest. The amendment would add this clarification to FAR 16.505(a)(10)(iv), while preserving the ability to protest on other separate legal bases recognized in FAR 16.505(a)(10)(i).
Fewer Protests, Faster Order Awards
Agencies expect this clarification to deter contractors from filing protests over set‑aside decisions, saving contractors and the Government time and resources and helping to expedite award of orders and avoid delays in meeting mission needs. The agencies note the rule could potentially affect any of the roughly 384,100 small entities currently registered in SAM that seek Government orders under multiple‑award contracts.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-17767, Promoting Telehealth in Rural America
In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) seeks comments on the scope of the similar service and rural area comparability requirements, comments on possible improvements to, or replacements of, our existing cost study method of determining rural telecommunications rates, comments on possible methods of promoting the use of lower-cost technologies intended to provide backup services, comments on a proposal to establish an eligible services list for the Rural Health Care (RHC) Program, comments on whether to adopt performance metrics to expedite the processing of RHC Program funding requests, and comments on whether to eliminate the approval requirement of evergreen contracts and an annual report requirement.
2026-17761, Maximizing Efficiencies in Universal Service Administration
In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) seeks to improve the administration of the Universal Service Fund (USF or Fund) by seeking comment on four areas related to USF administration: current USF administration processes, i.e., the processes used by Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) to administer the USF and the Commission's oversight of those processes; the structure of USF administration, that is, USAC's role and responsibilities related to USF administration; operating costs associated with USF administration; and the impact of USAC's Board of Directors on USF administration.
2026-17764, Section 898(c) Transition Rule for Allocating Foreign Taxes and Section 960(d)(4) Foreign Tax Credit Disallowance; Correction
The IRS fixed some details in their new rules about how foreign taxes are handled for certain companies, especially after a tax deferral option was removed. If you deal with foreign tax credits or earnings from foreign companies, these changes could affect your tax filings. Comments on these updates are open until September 17, 2026, so now’s the time to speak up!
2026-17774, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Seeks To Dismiss Twenty-Four Mooted or Outdated Petitions
In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) seeks to assess the continuing interest in certain petitions that were filed between 2003 and 2023. The Commission plans to dismiss the petitions with prejudice unless a petitioner or other interested party files a letter in the relevant docket specifying that it objects to the dismissal of the petition and the reason for such objection.
2026-17655, Passports: Expanding Online Passport Renewal Overseas
The Department proposes to amend 22 CFR 51.21 by consolidating requirements for persons applying by mail and online in the United States and overseas. This proposed change includes expanding online passport application availability to qualified applicants located in foreign countries. In addition, the Department is proposing to remove the requirement that an applicant's most recently issued passport must have a year or less of remaining validity to qualify to submit an online passport application. Finally, the Department is proposing technical corrections to 51.8(b) to change "on-line" to read "online" for consistency.
2026-17609, Airworthiness Directives; Embraer S.A. Airplanes
The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Embraer S.A. Model EMB-545 and EMB-550 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by the possibility of the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) compartment door seal peeling off and becoming entangled with the RAT rotor. This proposed AD would require replacement of the RAT compartment door seal. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2025-00615, Federal Acquisition Regulation: Small Business Participation on Certain Multiple-Award Contracts
The Department of Defense, GSA, and NASA want to make sure small businesses get a fair shot at winning spots on certain big government contracts. They’re proposing new rules to boost small business participation and want your feedback by March 17, 2025. This could open up more opportunities and money for small businesses in the near future!
Next: 2025-00638, Parentage Establishment in the Child Support Services Program; Withdrawal
The government is pulling back a plan to update child support rules to include all kinds of families, like those with same-sex parents. This means no changes will happen right now, so states and tribes keep doing things as they have been. If you’re involved in child support services, expect no new costs or deadlines from this withdrawal.