Franklin Ethereum ETF Staking Proposal Gets SEC Green Light Wait
Published Date: 3/18/2025
Notice
Summary
The Cboe BZX Exchange wants to update the rules for the Franklin Ethereum ETF so it can start staking the ether it holds. This means the fund can earn extra rewards by participating in Ethereum’s network, potentially boosting returns for investors. The change is under review now, and if approved, it could start soon, affecting anyone who invests in this ETF.
Analyzed Economic Effects
5 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 1 costs, 1 mixed.
ETF May Stake Ether to Earn Rewards
The Franklin Ethereum ETF would be allowed to stake some of the ether it holds and receive staking rewards (additional ether) that may be treated as income to the Fund. The rule change was filed with the SEC on March 10, 2025 and would permit the Fund to earn rewards by participating in Ethereum’s proof-of-stake network.
Staking Carries Slashing (Loss) Risk
Staking on Ethereum can lead to forfeiture or “slashing” of staked ether if validators engage in malicious activity or violate protocol rules, and the filing states the Sponsor will not bear or subsidize slashing risk on behalf of the Fund. Shareholders could therefore bear losses if staked ether is slashed.
Custody Method Keeps Ether in Custodian Wallet
The Sponsor intends to use “point-and-click” staking that does not move the Fund’s ether out of the Custodian’s wallet, which the filing says reduces the risk of theft at a node while staked but does not reduce slashing risk. This changes the operational risk profile for ETF shareholders.
Sponsor Will Maintain Liquidity for Redemptions
The Sponsor states it expects to maintain sufficient liquidity in the Fund to satisfy redemptions even when staking a portion of the Fund’s ether. This aims to protect shareholders’ ability to redeem shares.
Sponsor Limits Staking to Fund’s Ether Only
The Sponsor will stake only ether owned by the Fund, will not seek to pool the Fund’s ether with ether held by other entities (though pooling may occur at a Staking Provider level), and will not advertise or solicit staking services to others. This limits the Fund’s staking activity to Fund shareholders.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-20466, Adviser and Regulated Fund Custody Rules; Crypto Custody Rules
The SEC is updating rules for how investment advisers and funds handle crypto assets, making sure they keep these digital investments safe and properly reported. These changes affect advisers, funds, and anyone managing crypto securities, aiming to modernize rules and improve transparency. Comments on the proposal are open until December 7, 2026, so get ready to weigh in!
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2025-04352, Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Nasdaq Bitcoin Index Options
Nasdaq PHLX wants to start trading options based on the Nasdaq Bitcoin Index, but the SEC needs more time to decide if it’s a good idea. Instead of deciding by April 10, 2025, the SEC pushed the deadline to May 25, 2025. This affects investors interested in Bitcoin options and could open new ways to trade cryptocurrency-related products.
Next: 2025-04354, Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To Permit Orders Comprised of Options and Futures Legs (“Future-Option Orders”)
The Cboe Exchange wants to let traders place special orders that mix options and futures, called Future-Option Orders. The SEC is taking extra time to decide if this new rule is a good idea, pushing their decision deadline to June 5, 2025. This affects traders and the market by potentially making trading more flexible, but no money changes yet until the rule is approved.