2025-05899Proposed RuleWallet

NRC eases penalties for nuclear license update slip-ups

Published Date: 4/7/2025

Proposed Rule

Summary

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing a new policy that gives some wiggle room to general licensees who adopt changes made by Certificate of Compliance holders. This means fewer penalties for certain rule slip-ups while they update their systems. If you’re a licensee, you’ve got until April 28, 2025, to share your thoughts—no extra costs, just a smoother path forward!

Analyzed Economic Effects

4 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 2 costs, 0 mixed.

Enforcement discretion for general licensees

The NRC proposes an Interim Enforcement Policy to exercise enforcement discretion and not issue enforcement actions to a general licensee (GL) for certain violations of 10 CFR 72.48 and 72.212 when the noncompliance results from a Certificate of Compliance (CoC) holder's failure to comply with 10 CFR 72.48. If discretion is granted, the GL is expected to come into compliance using established processes, and the NRC staff will monitor the GL's actions. The IEP will remain in place until the underlying issue is resolved through rulemaking or other regulatory action.

No duplicate 72.48 evaluation when unchanged

Under the proposed IEP, when a GL adopts a CoC holder-generated change and does not make site-specific, technical changes, the GL would not be required to perform a separate 10 CFR 72.48 screening and/or evaluation. The GL would only need to review the CoC holder's change for applicability to its cask and for impacts on the GL's site-specific evaluations and programs (e.g., 10 CFR 72.212(b)(5) and (b)(6)).

Enforcement focused on change initiator

The proposed IEP states NRC enforcement actions will focus on the entity that initiated a change: the CoC holder will be accountable for noncompliance identified within CoC holder-generated 10 CFR 72.48 screenings and evaluations, while the GL will be accountable for noncompliance arising from GL-initiated changes. Each use of discretion will be documented with an enforcement action number.

GLs still must perform written evaluations

The IEP clarifies that GLs remain responsible for performing written evaluations to establish that a storage cask conforms to the terms and conditions of the CoC in accordance with 10 CFR 72.212(b)(5) and (b)(6). GLs must also ensure compliance with applicable quality-assurance requirements (Appendix B to 10 CFR part 50 and Subpart G to 10 CFR part 72).

Personalized for You

How does this regulation affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Key Dates

Published Date
4/7/2025

Department and Agencies

Department
Independent Agency
Agency
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Source: View HTML

Related Federal Register Documents

Previous / Next Documents

Back to Federal Register