NYSE Eases Fees for New Stock Listings in First Five Years
Published Date: 4/8/2025
Notice
Summary
If a company lists a new class of common stock on the NYSE, it only has to pay the initial and yearly fees for its main stock class during the first five years. This means no extra fees for other stock types or special changes during that time. This change helps new listings save money and starts right away!
Analyzed Economic Effects
2 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
Five-Year Fee Exemption for New NYSE Listings
If your company lists a class of common stock on the NYSE, then from the date of initial listing until its fifth anniversary your company will only owe the Initial Listing Fee and the Annual Listing Fee for its primary class of equity. During that five-year period the company is exempt from Additional Listing Fees and Alternative Listing Fees (examples include additional shares, additional classes, preferred stock, warrants, convertible securities, Technical Original Listing or reverse split applications, and record-change or poison-pill related applications). The filing notes the Initial Listing Fee is currently $325,000 and example Alternative Listing Fees include $5,000 for an additional class, a $10,000 minimum for additional shares (tiered per-share pricing), $0.004 per share for certain securities, $10,000 supplemental listing fee, $15,000 reverse split application fee, and $10,000 for certain record-change/poison pill applications.
Who Gets Exemptions and Key Limits
The exemption applies from the date of initial listing through the fifth anniversary and is effective April 1, 2025. Companies that initially listed a class of common equity on or after April 1, 2021 will receive a prorated portion of the five-year exemption running from April 1, 2025 to their five-year listing anniversary; fees paid before April 1, 2025 will not be refunded. Companies that transfer a primary class of common equity from another national securities exchange are not eligible, and issuers listing only preferred stock or debt remain subject to the other applicable fee schedules (for example, Sections 902.05, 902.06, and 902.08).
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-20466, Adviser and Regulated Fund Custody Rules; Crypto Custody Rules
The SEC is updating rules for how investment advisers and funds handle crypto assets, making sure they keep these digital investments safe and properly reported. These changes affect advisers, funds, and anyone managing crypto securities, aiming to modernize rules and improve transparency. Comments on the proposal are open until December 7, 2026, so get ready to weigh in!
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2025-05962, Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by The Options Clearing Corporation Concerning a Change in the Maximum Contingent Operational Loss Fee Listed in OCC's Schedule of Fees in Accordance With OCC's Capital Management Policy
The Options Clearing Corporation (OCC) just updated the maximum fee it can charge for unexpected operational losses, following its capital management plan. This change affects traders and firms using OCC’s services and takes effect immediately, helping keep the system strong and ready for surprises. The new fee update means everyone knows the max cost if things go sideways during operations.
Next: 2025-05964, Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Futures Exchange, LLC; Notice of a Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Accommodate the Use of Multiple Clearing Houses
Cboe Futures Exchange (CFE) is shaking things up by adding a new clearing house, Cboe Clear U.S. (CCUS), to handle some of its products like bitcoin and ether futures. This means CFE will use two clearing houses instead of one, giving traders more options and flexibility. The change is coming soon and won’t affect current products cleared by the existing clearing house, OCC.