2025-10324Proposed RuleWallet

NRC Considers Updating the Technical Rulebook for Nuclear Plant Safety

Published Date: 6/6/2025

Proposed Rule

Summary

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is reviewing a request to update rules for nuclear plant safety codes and standards. This affects nuclear facility operators by potentially changing some technical requirements and removing outdated conditions. The NRC wants your thoughts by August 5, 2025, before deciding on any final rule changes that could impact how plants operate and maintain safety.

Analyzed Economic Effects

9 provisions identified: 9 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.

Remove old IEEE safety standards requirement

The petitioner asks the NRC to delete 10 CFR 50.55a(h), removing the requirement to meet several IEEE safety-system standards (IEEE Std 279-1968, 279-1971, and 603-1991). The petitioner says these standards are dated and overly prescriptive for current technologies and that removing them would reduce unnecessary regulatory constraints on nuclear facility operators.

Remove mechanical joint pressure-testing condition

The petitioner asks the NRC to delete section XI Condition 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(xxvi), which requires pressure testing of Class 1, 2, and 3 mechanical joints. The petitioner states that post-testing maintenance already demonstrates leak tightness and that removing this requirement would provide an efficiency gain by eliminating a redundant regulatory step.

Permit construction before owner is established (Code Case N-883)

The petitioner proposes including ASME Code Case N-883 (Rev. 0) to allow fabrication to begin prior to establishment of an owner, as may be needed for factory-built advanced reactors. The petitioner states this permits earlier fabrication, supports shorter plant construction durations, and is consistent with existing Code practice for small items.

Permit remote verification and witnessing (N-916)

The petitioner seeks inclusion of ASME Code Case N-916 to allow remote verification and witnessing of certain activities (Section III), citing successful use of remote methods during the COVID-19 pandemic with no documented safety consequences. The petitioner says the technology now exists to support remote witnessing and that this will improve efficiency.

Accept non-destructive exam instead of weld repair (N-818)

The petitioner proposes including ASME Code Case N-818 to allow the use of non-destructive examination (NDE) and fracture mechanics to accept full penetration butt welds instead of performing weld repairs. The petitioner argues this approach is technically sound, based on light-water reactor experience, and can reduce the likelihood of in-service failures.

Allow flexible timing for preservice inspection (N-907)

The petitioner requests including ASME Code Case N-907 to permit performing preservice inspection (PSI) during construction at different times. The petitioner states there is no safety concern with PSI timing and that allowing flexibility offers significant schedule efficiencies and potential cost savings.

Use ultrasonic exam instead of radiography for welds (N-659)

The petitioner asks the NRC to accept ASME Code Case N-659 to allow ultrasonic examination (UT) in lieu of radiography for weld examination during construction. The petitioner states UT has a long history in commercial codes, is safe and practical, and would produce significant schedule efficiencies and potential cost savings in the field.

Allow alternatives for definitions without exemptions

The petitioner requests revising the applicability of 10 CFR 50.55a(y) and (z) so alternative definitions can be approved through the relief request process instead of requiring separate exemptions. The petitioner says this change would avoid administrative burden and speed reviews by letting alternatives be handled under 10 CFR 50.55a(z) rather than through exemption requests.

Allow audit due-date extensions in exigent conditions (N-915)

The petitioner requests inclusion of ASME Code Case N-915 to permit extension of internal and supplier audit due dates during exigent conditions. The petitioner notes audit extensions were used during the COVID-19 pandemic without documented safety consequences and says this flexibility supports supply-chain management and efficiency.

Personalized for You

How does this regulation affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Key Dates

Published Date
6/6/2025

Department and Agencies

Department
Independent Agency
Agency
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Source: View HTML

Related Federal Register Documents

Previous / Next Documents

Back to Federal Register