Tomato Trade Deal with Mexico Faces Potential Overhaul
Published Date: 6/18/2025
Notice
Summary
The government is asking for your thoughts on whether they should review their decision about special taxes on fresh tomatoes from Mexico. This review could change the current rules and affect tomato prices and imports. If they decide to end the current agreement, it might lead to more taxes or restrictions soon.
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.
Review Could End Tomato Suspension Agreement
The Commission is asking for public comments on whether to start a review under section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 about fresh tomatoes from Mexico (Investigation No. 731-TA-747, Fifth Review). The review would consider whether revoking the existing suspension agreement on imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury under 19 U.S.C. 1675(b)(2)(A).
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-16581, Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From China and India; Termination of Five-Year Reviews
The Commission instituted the subject five-year reviews on May 1, 2026 to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on carbazole violet pigment 23 from India and the antidumping duty orders on carbazole violet pigment 23 from China and India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. On August 7, 2026, the Department of Commerce published notice in the Federal Register that it was revoking the orders applicable August 7, 2026, because no domestic interested party filed a timely notice of intent to participate. Accordingly, the subject reviews are terminated.
2026-16667, Certain Mobile Electronic Devices; Notice of Institution of Investigation
Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on July 10, 2026, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Maxell, Ltd. of Kyoto, Japan. An amended complaint was filed on July 24, 2026. The amended complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain mobile electronic devices by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,812,646 ("the '646 patent"); U.S. Patent No. 12,513,408 ("the '408 patent"); U.S. Patent No. 12,061,760 ("the '760 patent"); U.S. Patent No. 12,418,692 ("the '692 patent"); U.S. Patent No. 12,185,211 ("the '211 patent"); and U.S. Patent No. 12,647,935 ("the '935 patent"). The amended complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The amended complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders.
2026-16469, Choline Salts From China; Determinations
The U.S. International Trade Commission found that imports of choline salts from China might be hurting American businesses by being sold unfairly cheap and getting government help. This means a deeper investigation is starting soon, which could lead to new rules or tariffs to protect U.S. companies. If you’re involved in this industry, keep an eye out for updates and possible changes that could affect prices and trade.
2026-16303, Certain Pre-Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair and Packaging Thereof (II); Notice of the Commission's Determination To Review in Part, and, on Review, To Affirm in Part and Take No Position in Part on a Final Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337; Termination of the Investigation
The U.S. International Trade Commission looked into a complaint about certain synthetic braiding hair and its packaging, but found no rule-breaking. They reviewed the case, agreed with some parts, stayed neutral on others, and decided to end the investigation. This affects companies importing and selling these hair products, with no fines or penalties coming their way.
2026-16332, Certain Glass Substrates for Liquid Crystal Displays, Products Containing the Same, and Methods for Manufacturing the Same; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest
Notice is hereby given that on July 23, 2026, the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337. On August 6, 2026, the ALJ issued a Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bonding should a violation be found in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation. This notice is soliciting comments from the public and interested government agencies only.
2026-16302, Large Vertical Shaft Engines From China; Determinations
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2025-11225, Hackett Mills Hydro Associates, LLC; Notice Soliciting Scoping Comments
Hackett Mills Hydro Associates wants to renew their license to keep running their hydroelectric project on the Little Androscoggin River in Maine. The government is asking the public to share their thoughts by July 14, 2025, to help decide if any changes are needed. This could affect local energy production but won’t cost the public money directly right now.
Next: 2025-11227, Certain Dryer Wall Exhaust Vent Assemblies and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination To Issue Remedial Orders Against the Defaulting Respondent; Termination of Investigation
The U.S. International Trade Commission is taking action against Xiamen Dirongte Trading Co., Ltd. for selling certain dryer wall exhaust vent parts that break the rules. They’re stopping these products from coming into the U.S. and making Xiamen pay a bond equal to the full value of the goods during review. This means faster protection for American businesses and a clear message to importers: follow the rules or face the music!