FINRA Eases Bond Reporting: Faster Trades, Same Old Rules
Published Date: 6/20/2025
Notice
Summary
FINRA is keeping the 15-minute deadline for reporting certain bond trades but is making it easier to report big orders split across many customer accounts. This change helps firms save time and avoid confusion when sharing trade info. The new rule is up for public comment now and could affect how quickly and smoothly trade data gets reported, with no extra costs expected.
Analyzed Economic Effects
3 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Optional Aggregate Reporting for Allocations
FINRA would let a firm that is both a broker-dealer and an investment adviser (BD/IA) report allocations of an aggregate order to multiple managed customer accounts as a single aggregate TRACE trade report, provided the allocations share the same price and Time of Execution and the report is submitted within the applicable reporting timeframe. Use of this alternative is voluntary, the aggregate report must include the number of managed accounts, and FINRA estimates that if all eligible trades used this option the number of reports would fall from 7,570,097 to 487,625.
Keep 15‑Minute TRACE Reporting Window
FINRA proposes to keep the current rule requiring firms to report TRACE-eligible trades as soon as practicable but no later than within 15 minutes from the Time of Execution. The proposal removes references to a one-minute timeframe, deletes the earlier manual-trade and limited-activity exceptions, and deletes the manual trade indicator requirement.
TRACE Correction Marking Logic Change
FINRA will update TRACE system logic so timeliness is judged only by the time the original trade report was submitted, meaning a member's correction to a disseminated field entered after the reporting timeframe will not be marked late if the original transaction was reported on time. This change applies to trade corrections and is intended to provide a focused view on initial report timeliness.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-20466, Adviser and Regulated Fund Custody Rules; Crypto Custody Rules
The SEC is updating rules for how investment advisers and funds handle crypto assets, making sure they keep these digital investments safe and properly reported. These changes affect advisers, funds, and anyone managing crypto securities, aiming to modernize rules and improve transparency. Comments on the proposal are open until December 7, 2026, so get ready to weigh in!
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2025-11297, Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fees for Nasdaq 100 Index Options in Options 7, Section 5.A
Nasdaq PHLX is changing the fees for trading Nasdaq 100 Index options by adding a new charge for taking liquidity away from the market. This affects traders who buy or sell these options and starts right away, meaning some trades might cost a bit more. The goal is to keep the market fair and balanced while updating how fees work.
Next: 2025-11299, Self-Regulatory Organizations; the Options Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the Options Clearing Corporation Concerning the Adoption of a New Clearing Agreement That Would Permit OCC To Provide Clearing and Settlement Services to MIAX Subject to All Requisite Regulatory Approvals Being Received
The Options Clearing Corporation (OCC) is teaming up with MIAX Futures Exchange to handle clearing and settlement services once all the necessary approvals are in place. This new agreement means smoother, faster processing for MIAX’s trades without changing OCC’s existing rules. The change is effective immediately, signaling a fresh chapter in how MIAX’s contracts get cleared and settled.