Forest Service Bans Shooting Forever on Vast Colorado Lands
Published Date: 8/13/2025
Notice
Summary
The Forest Service just made a permanent rule banning recreational shooting on nearly 95,000 acres across parts of Clear Creek, Larimer, and Grand Counties in Colorado. This affects anyone who loves target practice or shooting for fun in these forest and grassland areas. The ban starts now and helps keep the land safer and more enjoyable for everyone—no fees or extra costs involved!
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.
Permanent shooting ban on ~94,900 acres
If you enjoy target practice or shooting for fun, you can no longer do recreational shooting on about 94,900 acres in southern Clear Creek, northern Larimer, and Grand Counties, Colorado. The ban applies to the Clear Creek, Canyon Lakes, and Sulphur Ranger Districts of the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests and the Pawnee National Grassland and is a final permanent order that starts now; there are no fees or extra costs tied to the ban.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-16965, Special Areas; Roadless Area Conservation
The USDA wants to cancel the 2001 Roadless Rule that stopped road building and logging in special forest areas. This change gives local forest managers more freedom to decide how to care for these lands based on local needs. People have until September 21, 2026, to share their thoughts, and this could affect how forests are managed and how money is spent on these lands.
2026-17211, Travel Management; National Forest System Lands
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is initiating an environmental impact statement and rulemaking to revise the Forest Service's travel management regulations, 36 CFR part 212. The proposed action would establish a uniform national policy favoring increased access while simplifying regulatory requirements and preserving local decision-making. The proposed access rule would establish a national policy with a presumption that existing roads, trails, airfields, trailheads, and other access routes and points on National Forest System lands are open to appropriate public use unless closure or restriction is required by applicable law, valid existing rights, or another governing instrument, or supported by specific, documented and justifiable reasons based on science-based resource conditions, public safety, conflicts among uses, or maintenance and administrative capacity. Commonly available public data sets, including aerial imagery, may be used as evidence that a physical route or airfield exists or existed at a time relevant under the definition adopted in the proposed rule, but would not by themselves establish that the feature is part of the forest transportation system, that the Forest Service has jurisdiction or sufficient legal access, or that it is open to a particular public use. The proposed access rule would require annual review of all trails, roads, airfields, trailheads, and other access routes and points that are closed or highly restricted. The proposed access rule would establish processes and conditions for limited off-route motor vehicle use and other motorized equipment for, among other things, downed big-game retrieval, firewood collection and dispersed camping, and for designating areas for over-snow and other motorized recreation. The presumption embodied in the national policy would guide future decisions and would not itself change the legal status of any road, trail, airfield, trailhead, area, or other access route or point. Any change in lawful use resulting from a vehicle- or use-specific exemption would be limited to the scope and conditions expressly provided in the revised regulations. Existing motor vehicle use designations and maps would remain in effect until revised under the amended regulations. The environmental impact statement will evaluate the impacts of the proposed rule revisions and study alternatives for managing public access, including the motorized and other forms of access addressed by the proposed rule, on National Forest System lands in the context of multiple-use resource management. USDA invites written comments on alternatives, effects, and relevant information, studies, or analyses related to the proposal.
2026-15255, Black Hills National Forest; Wyoming; Bear Lodge Rare Earth Project
The USDA Under Secretary, Natural Resources and Environment, through the Forest Service, Black Hills National Forest, intends to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) to analyze and disclose effects from the proposed Mine Plan of Operations (MPO), submitted by Rare Element Resources Inc. (proponent), for the development of the Bear Lodge Rare Earth Project. This EIS will evaluate potential impacts of the proposed open-pit mining for rare earth elements from National Forest System (NFS) lands and its associated infrastructure. The proposed action is expected to require a project-specific forest plan amendment to authorize deviation from existing visual standards and guidelines in the Black Hills Forest Plan. The Planning, Administrative Reviews, and Litigation System identification number for the project is #291093.
2026-13832, Yavapai Resource Advisory Committee
The Yavapai Resource Advisory Committee is meeting on August 11, 2026, to discuss projects and recreation fees for Prescott National Forest. If you live nearby or care about forest fun and funding, you can join in person or online and share your thoughts by August 9. This meeting helps decide how money is spent to keep the forest awesome and accessible for everyone.
2026-13838, West Virginia Resource Advisory Committee
The West Virginia Resource Advisory Committee is meeting in early August 2026 to discuss projects and funding for the Monongahela National Forest. Local communities, outdoor lovers, and anyone interested in forest recreation fees can join in by sending comments or speaking at the meetings. These sessions help decide how money is spent and what changes might come to the forest, so don’t miss your chance to weigh in before the July deadlines!
2026-13281, Organization, Functions, and Procedures; Public Notice and Comment for Standards, Criteria, and Guidance Applicable to Forest Service Programs
The Forest Service is updating its rules to give employees more freedom to adapt programs based on local forest conditions and changing community needs. This means they can be more creative and flexible while still following clear standards. If you want to share your thoughts, make sure to send comments by July 31, 2026—no cost involved, just your voice!
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2025-15329, Pipeline Safety: Information Collection Activities
PHMSA is updating the instructions for a gas pipeline incident report form to make it clearer how to report intentional gas releases during emergencies. This affects companies that operate gas transmission, gathering, and storage facilities. They’re asking for feedback and working with the Office of Management and Budget to keep things smooth and safe—no extra costs expected, just clearer rules!
Next: 2025-15331, Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Capital Construction Fund Agreement, Certificate Family of Forms and Deposit/Withdrawal Report
NOAA is renewing its paperwork for the Capital Construction Fund, which helps fishermen save money tax-free to build or fix their boats. About 1,225 fishermen will keep filling out forms that take 1.5 to 2 hours each, with no big changes or new costs. The government is asking for comments for 30 more days before final approval, keeping the process smooth and fair.