USPTO Proposes Revisions to Patent Trial and Appeal Board Practices
Published Date: 10/17/2025
Proposed Rule
Summary
The USPTO wants to change the rules for how patent challenges happen before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. These updates affect inventors, companies, and lawyers by making the review process clearer and possibly faster. If you want to share your thoughts, you need to comment by November 17, 2025—so don’t wait!
Analyzed Economic Effects
6 provisions identified: 4 benefits, 2 costs, 0 mixed.
IPR Barred If Claims Were Already Found Valid
The PTAB would not institute or maintain an IPR for a challenged claim (or an independent claim from which it depends) if that claim was already found not invalid under 35 U.S.C. 102 or 103 by (1) a district court trial or jury verdict, (2) district court summary judgment, (3) the U.S. International Trade Commission, (4) a PTAB final written decision, (5) ex parte reexamination office action/Board decision, or (6) where the Federal Circuit reversed a finding of unpatentability or invalidity.
Must Promise Not To Re-raise Key Grounds
If you file an inter partes review (IPR) petition, the Board will not start or keep the IPR unless you file a written stipulation saying that, if a trial is instituted, you and any real party in interest will not raise invalidity or unpatentability grounds under 35 U.S.C. 102 or 103 in any other proceeding. That stipulation must be filed with the PTAB and any other tribunal where you are litigating regarding the challenged patent.
No IPR When Parallel Case Likely Decides First
The USPTO would not institute or maintain an IPR if, more likely than not, a parallel district court trial, an ITC initial/final determination, or a PTAB final written decision will occur with respect to the challenged claim before the PTAB's final written decision is due under 35 U.S.C. 316(a)(11).
Rule Aimed To Reduce Litigation Costs For Small Firms
The USPTO states the proposed rule focuses IPRs on patents not previously litigated or resolved early and estimates this will reduce litigation costs and transaction costs for patent licensing, likely benefiting a greater percentage of small entities. The Office certified the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
More PTAB Time For Ex Parte Appeals
The USPTO says limiting some IPRs will free administrative patent judge (APJ) time to handle ex parte appeals from examination, which the Office says should reduce ex parte appeal pendency and speed decisions on whether patent application claims should issue.
Paperwork Time Up 1 Hour Per Petition
The USPTO estimates each IPR petition will need one extra hour (from 120 to 121 hours) to prepare and submit the new stipulation. At 1,300 petitions per year, the Office estimates an added 1,300 annual respondent burden hours and an increase of $581,100 in hourly cost burden (using $447/hour).
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this federal register document and every other regulation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-08798 — Extension and Modification of the Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program
The USPTO is extending its Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program until May 6, 2028, letting inventors speed up their patent appeal reviews. Now, decisions will come even faster—within four months instead of six! This helps inventors get answers quicker without changing fees, making the patent process smoother and snappier.
2026-08101 — Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Comment Request; DOCX Submission Requirements
The USPTO is asking for public comments on updating their rules about submitting patent applications in DOCX format. If you don’t use DOCX for certain patent filings, you might have to pay a fee starting from January 2024. Comments are open until June 26, 2026, so now’s the time to speak up if you’re affected!
2026-07831 — Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Secrecy and License To Export
The USPTO is asking for your thoughts on renewing a form that helps keep some patent info secret for national security and controls exporting licenses. This affects inventors and businesses dealing with sensitive tech, aiming to keep paperwork light and clear. You’ve got until May 22, 2026, to share your comments—no fees, just your voice!
2026-07574 — Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Appeals
The Patent and Trademark Office is asking for public feedback on how it collects information for appeals handled by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). This is a routine update to keep things running smoothly and make sure the process is clear and efficient. If you’re involved in patent appeals, now’s your chance to share your thoughts before June 22, 2026!
2026-07575 — Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Global Intellectual Property Academy (GIPA) Surveys
The USPTO is asking for your thoughts on updating their Global Intellectual Property Academy (GIPA) surveys, which help improve how they support IP systems worldwide. If you’re involved in IP or just curious, you can comment until June 22, 2026. This update won’t cost you money but will help make sure the surveys stay useful and clear.
2026-07442 — Termination of the Fast-Track for COVID-19-Related Appeals Pilot Program
The USPTO is ending its Fast-Track program that sped up COVID-19-related patent appeals because it wasn’t used much. Starting April 17, 2026, no new fast-track requests will be accepted, letting the office focus on speeding up all patent appeals instead. This change won’t cost anyone extra but means COVID-19 appeals will follow the regular review timeline from now on.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2025-19557 — Periodic Reporting
The Postal Service wants to change how it counts the costs of mail that can’t be delivered as addressed (UAA mail) in its regular reports. This affects anyone interested in postal costs and mail delivery, and the public can comment by November 3, 2025. These changes aim to make cost reports clearer and more accurate, but they won’t change your mailbox or prices right now.
Next: 2025-19587 — Patent Trial and Appeal Board Rules of Practice for Briefing Discretionary Denial Issues, and Rules for 325(d) Considerations, Instituting Parallel and Serial Petitions, and Termination Due to Settlement Agreement
The USPTO is pulling back a proposed rule that would have changed how patent challenges are handled by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. This affects inventors, companies, and lawyers who deal with patent reviews, as the changes around multiple petitions and settlements won’t happen now. No new fees or deadlines are coming from this, but stay tuned for future updates!